Cost Analysis of Low-Volume Versus Standard-Volume Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery.

Background Economic evaluation has become an essential decision-making tool for health systems worldwide. This study was aimed at estimating the difference in the use of healthcare resources, days on sick leave, and costs between patients undergoing a standard-volume versus a low-volume ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Methods This is a post-hoc cost analysis of a double-blind, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Forty-eight patients undergoing ultrasound-guided interscalene block received either 10 ml or 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Analyses involved the public healthcare payer perspective (including visits to general practitioners, nursing staff, physiotherapy facilities, hospital admissions, outpatient diagnostic tests, etc.) and the limited societal perspective, including productivity losses (days on sick leave). Measurements were made at one-month and one-year follow-ups post-intervention. Differences in costs were estimated using two-part models adjusted by the costs incurred in the previous year. Results Subjects in the 10 ml group made greater use of general practitioner visits (mean difference [95% CI]: 3.35 [0.219 to 6.49]; p=0.036) and diagnostic tests (2.43 [0.601 to 4.26]; p=0.009), but less use of physical therapy (-12.9 [-21.7 to -4.06]; p=0.004). Mean (SD) cost differences from the public healthcare payer's perspective were 1,461.34 $ (1,541.62) and 1,024.08$ (943.83) for the 10 ml and 20 ml groups, respectively (p=0.293). From the limited societal perspective, the differences were as follows: 7,036.53$ (8,077.58) and 8,666.56$ (9,841.10), respectively (p=0.937). While there were no differences in the above parameters at the one-month follow-up. Conclusion The volume reduction proposed following interscalene block resulted in meaningful, albeit not statistically significant, clinical benefits and lower costs from a limited societal perspective for shoulder surgery. Thus, healthcare use and days on sick leave are variables to be taken into consideration when calculating the economic impact of surgical procedures.

A Comparison of the Asleep-Awake Technique and Monitored Anesthesia Care During Awake Craniotomy: A 10-Year Analysis.

Background Awake intracranial surgery with direct electrical stimulation (DES) is considered the gold standard for the resection of tumors affecting the eloquent areas of the brain. Awake craniotomy is a challenge for the anesthesiologist, as the patient's active cooperation is required throughout the operation. There are two frequent techniques, one is asleep-awake-asleep (AAA), and the other is called monitored anesthesia care (MAC). The AAA technique is the longer standing of the two and comprises general anesthesia followed by intraoperative awakening, which is necessary for neurological monitoring. In the present study, a comparison was made between the asleep-awake (AA) technique, a variation of the AAA anesthesia technique, and the MAC, which consists of a sedation that makes it possible to control pain and anxiety. Unlike the AA technique, the MAC does not involve the use of invasive airway devices. Objective The main objective was to contrast the two anesthetic management techniques for awake brain surgery used in our hospital. Methods A retrospective observational single-center study was performed consisting of a review of patient clinical records. The study sample comprised all patients above 18 years of age undergoing brain surgery through awake craniotomy between January 2013 and December 2022 at the Miguel Servet University Hospital (HUMS) in Zaragoza (Spain). Results Of the 79 patients included in the study, 39 were operated under AA anesthesia while the remaining 40 were operated under the MAC procedure. The main age of the participants was 52.8 years, the mean height was 169 cm, and the mean weight was 74.2 kg. No statistically significant differences were observed with respect to the patients' baseline characteristics, except for obesity which was more prevalent in the MAC group. In the MAC group, the airway was managed by means of nasal cannulas in all cases, with conversion to general anesthesia being required in only one instance. In the AA group, the laryngeal mask (LM) was used in 89.7% of the patients, and the endotracheal tube (ETT) in 10.3%. The surgical and anesthetic procedure duration was 15 and 20 minutes shorter in the MAC group, respectively. A reduction of almost 20 minutes in the anesthetic procedure and 15 minutes in the surgical one was observed. Tachycardia, desaturation, and airway complications were observed in four, five, and four patients respectively in the AA group but in none of the patients in the MAC group. The mean stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the mean postoperative hemoglobin levels between both groups were insignificant. Conclusions Both techniques analyzed in this study turned out to be equally safe and effective for brain tumor surgery in awake patients.

Postoperative neurological complications after brachial plexus block: a retrospective study conducted at a teaching hospital.

PURPOSE: Serious complications after ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia can be devastating for the patient. The pathogenesis of postoperative neurological complications (PONC) is multifactorial and includes mechanical, vascular and chemical factors besides the nerve puncture itself. The primary aim of this study was to assess the incidence of PONC after brachial plexus block (BPB). METHODS: This is an observational retrospective single-centre study conducted at the regional anaesthesia unit of a teaching hospital. All BPBs performed from January 2011 to November 2019 were included. The outcomes analysed were the incidence, aetiology and diagnosis of PONCs and the incidence of other postoperative complications such as local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), pneumothorax, wrong-side block, etc. The performance of trainees and experienced anaesthesiologists was compared across all the outcomes. RESULTS: From a total of 5340 BPBs included, 15 cases developed PONC, yielding a rate of 2.81:1000 (95% CI 1.70-4.63). Thirteen patients underwent neurophysiological exams which confirmed nine neuropathies. The rate of PONCs for supervised trainees was 1.80:1000 (95% CI 0.701-4.62), not statistically different from that of experienced anaesthesiologists (p = 0.241). Three cases were considered to present with a PONC probably related to BPB [0.562:1,00 (95% CI 0.191-1.65)]. The incidence of long-term PONCs was 1.12:1000 (95% CI 0.515-2.45). Such complications proved irreversible in 2 cases. The incidences of LAST, pneumothorax and other complications observed were 0.749:1000 (95% CI 0.291-1.92), 0.187:1000 (95% CI 0.0331-1.06) and 4.31:1000 (95% CI 2.87-6.46), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This survey suggests that complications after ultrasound-guided BPB, including blocks performed by trainees, are uncommon. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04451642.

A propósito de un caso de embolismo aéreo en cirugía de la glándula suprarrenal

El embolismo aéreo venoso es una complicación que ocasiona gran morbimortalidad. Describimos un caso de embolia aérea en cirugía de la glándula suprarrenal en paciente ASA I, que finalizó en parada cardiocirculatoria y con el fallecimiento del paciente. Debemos sospechar la embolia aérea en cualquier tipo de intervención quirúrgica, terapéutica o diagnóstica en la que pueda producirse un gradiente de presión superior a 5 cm H2O.

Bloqueos tronculares de la extremidad inferior en pacientes críticos: A propósito de dos casos

We report two cases of anesthesia of sciaticpopliteal interne nerve, sciaticpopliteal external nerve and femoral nerve in critical ill patients under vascular surgery of lower limbs. One case is a patient diagnosed of recent pulmonary embolism and the other one diagnosed of recent myocardial infarction. The procedures were successful in both cases without complications. We recommend this procedure in critical patients undergoing surgery of lower extremities.