Prevalencia del cáncer del tracto urinario. Análisis de la cohorte española del estudio IDENTIFY / Prevalence of urinary tract cancer in the Spanish cohort of the IDENTIFY study

Introducción Los tumores malignos del tracto urinario están asociados a gran morbimortalidad siendo su prevalencia variable a nivel global. Recientemente el estudio IDENTIFY ha publicado resultados sobre la prevalencia del cáncer del tracto urinario a nivel internacional. Este estudio evalúa la prevalencia de cáncer dentro de la cohorte española del estudio IDENTIFY para determinar si los resultados publicados son extrapolables a nuestra población. Material y métodos Se realizó un análisis de los datos de la cohorte de pacientes españoles del estudio IDENTIFY. Se trata de una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes derivados al hospital con sospecha de cáncer, predominantemente por hematuria. Los pacientes fueron reclutados entre diciembre de 2017 y diciembre de 2018. Resultados En total 706 pacientes procedente de 9 centros españoles fueron analizados. Doscientos setenta y siete pacientes (39,2%) fueron diagnosticados de cáncer, 259 (36,7%) de cáncer vejiga, 10 (1,4%) de tracto urinario superior, 9 (1,2%) renal y 5 (0,7%) de próstata. El aumento de la edad (OR: 1,05; IC 95%: 1,03-1,06; p<0,001), presencia de hematuria visible (OR: 2,19; IC 95%: 1,13-4,24; p=0,02) y el hábito tabáquico (exfumadores: OR: 2,11; IC 95%: 1,30-3,40; p=0,002; fumadores: OR: 2,36; IC 95%: 1,40-3,95; p=0,001) se asocia con mayor probabilidad de cáncer vesical. Conclusión Este estudio resalta el riesgo que existe en pacientes con HV y hábito tabáquico de presentar cáncer de vejiga. El cáncer de vejiga presentó la mayor prevalencia, siendo esta mayor que la expuesta en series previas y la presentada en el estudio IDENTIFY. Trabajos futuros deben evaluar otros factores asociados que permitan crear modelos de predicción de cáncer para seguir aumentando la detección de estos en nuestros pacientes. (AU)

Introduction Malignant tumors of the urinary tract are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and their prevalence can vary worldwide. Recently, the IDENTIFY study has published results on the prevalence of urinary tract cancer at a global level. This study evaluates the prevalence of cancer within the Spanish cohort of the IDENTIFY study to determine whether the published results can be extrapolated to our population. Patients and methods An analysis of the data from the Spanish cohort of patients in the IDENTIFY study was performed. This is a prospective cohort of patients referred to secondary care with suspected cancer, predominantly due to hematuria. Patients were recruited between December 2017 and December 2018. Results A total of 706 patients from 9 Spanish centers were analyzed. Of these, 277 (39.2%) were diagnosed with cancer: 259 (36.7%) bladder cancer, 10 (1.4%) upper tract urothelial carcinoma, 9 (1.2%) renal cancer and 5 (0.7%) prostate cancer. Increasing age (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.03-1.06; P<.001), visible hematuria (VH) OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.13-4.24; P=.02)and smoking (ex-smokers: OR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.30-3.40; P=.002); (smokers: OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.40-3.95; P=.001) were associated with higher probability of bladder cancer. Conclusion This study highlights the risk of bladder cancer in patients with VH and smoking habits. Bladder cancer presented the highest prevalence; higher than the prevalence reported in previous series and presented in the IDENTIFY study. Future work should evaluate other associated factors that allow us to create cancer prediction models to improve the detection of cancer in our patients. (AU)

Prevalence of urinary tract cancer in the Spanish cohort of the IDENTIFY study.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant tumors of the urinary tract are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and their prevalence can vary worldwide. Recently, the IDENTIFY study has published results on the prevalence of urinary tract cancer at a global level. This study evaluates the prevalence of cancer within the Spanish cohort of the IDENTIFY study to determine whether the published results can be extrapolated to our population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An analysis of the data from the Spanish cohort of patients in the IDENTIFY study was performed. This is a prospective cohort of patients referred to secondary care with suspected cancer, predominantly due to hematuria. Patients were recruited between December 2017 and December 2018. RESULTS: A total of 706 patients from 9 Spanish centers were analyzed. Of these, 277 (39.2%) were diagnosed with cancer: 259 (36.7%) bladder cancer, 10 (1.4%) upper tract urothelial carcinoma, 9 (1.2%) renal cancer and 5 (0.7%) prostate cancer. Increasing age (OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03-1.06; P < 0.001)), visible hematuria (VH) OR 2.19 (95% CI 1.13-4.24; P = 0.02)) and smoking (ex-smokers: OR 2.11(95% CI 1.30-3.40; P = 0.002); smokers: OR 2.36 (95% CI 1.40-3.95; P = 0.001)) were associated with higher probability of bladder cancer. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the risk of bladder cancer in patients with VH and smoking habits. Bladder cancer presented the highest prevalence; higher than the prevalence reported in previous series and presented in the IDENTIFY study. Future work should evaluate other associated factors that allow us to create cancer prediction models to improve the detection of cancer in our patients.

Androgen deprivation therapy in localized prostate cancer. Current status and future trends.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) has been recognized as an androgen-sensitive disease since the investigations from Huggins and Hodges in 1941. Thanks to these findings, they received the Nobel Prize in 1966. This was the beginning of the development of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as treatment for patients with PCa. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current indications of ADT in localized PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a comprehensive English and Spanish language literature research, focused on the main indications for ADT in localized PCa. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Nowadays, the indications for ADT as monotherapy in localized PCa have been limited to specific situations, to patients unwilling or unable to receive any form of local treatment if they have a PSA-DT < 12 months, and either a PSA > 50 ng/mL, a poorly differentiated tumor, or troublesome local disease-related symptoms. ADT can be used in combination with local treatment in different scenarios. Although neoadjuvant treatment with ADT prior to surgery with curative intent has no clear oncological impact, as a future sight, PCa is a heterogeneous disease, and there could be a group of patients with high-risk localized disease that could benefit. CONCLUSIONS: We need to optimize the treatment with ADT in localized PCa, selecting the patients accordingly to their disease characteristics. Given that the therapeutic armamentarium evolves day by day, there is a need for the development of new clinical trials, as well as a molecular studies of patients to identify those who might benefit from an early multimodal treatment.

Terapia de privación de andrógenos en el cáncer de próstata localizado. Situación actual y tendencias futuras / Androgen deprivation therapy in localized prostate cancer. Current status and future trends

Introducción El cáncer de próstata (CaP) se ha reconocido como una enfermedad sensible a los andrógenos desde las investigaciones de Huggins y Hodges en 1941, quienes, gracias a estos hallazgos, recibieron el Premio Nobel en 1966. Aquí se originó el desarrollo de la terapia de privación de andrógenos (TPA) como tratamiento para los pacientes con CaP. Objetivo Resumir las indicaciones actuales de la TPA en el CaP localizado. Adquisición de la evidencia Hemos realizado una investigación bibliográfica exhaustiva en inglés y español, centrada en las principales indicaciones de la TPA en el CaP localizado. Síntesis de la evidencia En la actualidad, las indicaciones de la TPA como monoterapia en el CaP localizado se han limitado a situaciones específicas, a pacientes que no desean o no pueden recibir ninguna forma de tratamiento local y que tienen un PSA-DT<12 meses y un PSA>50 ng/mL, un tumor poco diferenciado o síntomas locales molestos relacionados con la enfermedad. La TPA puede utilizarse en combinación con tratamiento local en diferentes escenarios. Aunque el tratamiento neoadyuvante con TPA antes de la cirugía con intención curativa no tiene un impacto oncológico claro, el CaP es una enfermedad heterogénea y en el futuro podría haber un grupo de pacientes con enfermedad localizada de alto riesgo que se beneficiaran de este tratamiento. Conclusiones Necesitamos optimizar el tratamiento con TPA en el CaP localizado, seleccionando a los pacientes en función de las características de su enfermedad. Dado que el arsenal terapéutico evoluciona día a día, es necesario el desarrollo de nuevos ensayos clínicos, así como el estudio molecular en los pacientes, para identificar a aquellos que podrían beneficiarse de un tratamiento multimodal temprano (AU)

Introduction Prostate cancer (PCa) has been recognized as an androgen-sensitive disease since the investigations from Huggins and Hodges in 1941. Thanks to these findings, they received the Nobel Prize in 1966. This was the beginning of the development of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as treatment for patients with PCa. Objective To summarize the current indications of ADT in localized PCa. Evidence acquisition We conducted a comprehensive English and Spanish language literature research, focused on the main indications for ADT in localized PCa. Evidence synthesis Nowadays, the indications for ADT as monotherapy in localized PCa have been limited to specific situations, to patients unwilling or unable to receive any form of local treatment if they have a PSA-DT<12 months, and either a PSA>50 ng/mL, a poorly differentiated tumor, or troublesome local disease-related symptoms. ADT can be used in combination with local treatment in different scenarios. Although neoadjuvant treatment with ADT prior to surgery with curative intent has no clear oncological impact, as a future sight, PCa is a heterogeneous disease, and there could be a group of patients with high-risk localized disease that could benefit. Conclusions We need to optimize the treatment with ADT in localized PCa, selecting the patients accordingly to their disease characteristics. Given that the therapeutic armamentarium evolves day by day, there is a need for the development of new clinical trials, as well as a molecular studies of patients to identify those who might benefit from an early multimodal treatment (AU)

Impact of a delayed presentation to the emergency department for acute renal colic on biochemical and clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To verify the impact of delay on biochemical and clinical outcomes for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from three institutions of two European countries between 01 January and 30 April 2020. Patients who presented to the ED with unilateral or bilateral renal colic caused by urolithiasis confirmed by imaging tests during the study period were included. A presentation after 24 h since the onset of symptoms was considered a delay. Patients presenting before 24 h from the symptom onset were included in Group A, while the patients presenting after 24 h in Group B. Clinical and biochemical parameters and management were compared. RESULTS: A total of 397 patients who presented to ED with confirmed urolithiasis were analyzed (Group A, n = 199; Group B, n = 198. The median (IQR) delay in presentation was 2 days (1,5-4). At presentation, no statistically significant differences were found amongst the two groups of patients regarding presenting symptoms such as fever and flank pain, and the median serum levels of creatinine, C reactive protein and white blood cells. No differences were found in terms of conservative or operative management. CONCLUSION: Delay in consultation >24 h is not associated with worsening biochemical parameters and clinical outcomes. Most patients with acute loin pain do not necessarily need urgent attendance to the ED and may be managed in the outpatients.

La educación quirúrgica en línea implementada en los programas de residencia urológica como respuesta a la COVID-19: estudio piloto / Online surgical education adopted among urology residency programs in response to COVID-19: A pilot study

Objetivo: Comprender la percepción de los residentes respecto a los sistemas de aprendizaje en línea, los cuales, impulsados por la pandemia de la COVID-19, han sido recientemente implementados a nivel nacional en los programas de residencia urológica acreditados. Adicionalmente, nos proponemos analizar su sostenibilidad tras la era de la pandemia.Material y métodos: Se diseñó una encuesta para, a través de los coordinadores y directores de programas de urología, difundirla a los residentes de urología.En la encuesta, los modelos de educación en línea englobaron cualquier forma de educación recibida por los residentes que se diera en línea. Las encuestas anónimas se exportaron de Survey Monkey y se analizaron los datos para determinar la significación estadística.Resultados: Más del 70% de los residentes de urología estuvieron de acuerdo, o mostraron una actitud neutral, ante la afirmación de que los modelos de educación en línea eran equivalentes al aprendizaje presencial. Solo el 13% de los residentes afirmaron que el aprendizaje en línea no debería continuar tras la pandemia. Se evaluaron diversos parámetros, y solo 5 de ellos mostraron significación estadística. El estrés, el compromiso personal, la eficacia de la comunicación interpersonal y las señales no verbales fueron más bajos para los modelos de educación en línea. El único aspecto al que los residentes dieron mayor puntuación fue el de los problemas de conectividad a una red.Conclusiones: La gran mayoría de los residentes de urología en Estados Unidos cree que los modelos de educación en línea deben mantenerse una vez terminada la pandemia. (AU)

Objective: To understand the residents’ perceptions of the, COVID-19 driven, newly implemented online learning systems adopted among accredited urology residency programs nationwide, and their sustainability following the pandemic era.Materials and methods: A survey was designed and dispersed to urology program coordinators and directors to distribute to their residents.In the survey, online education models was the all-encompassing term to describe any form of resident education that occurred online. Anonymous surveys were exported from Survey Monkey and data was analyzed for statistical significance.Results: Over 70% of urology residents agreed or were neutral to the statement that online education models were equivalent to in-person learning. Only 13% of residents stated that online learning should not be continued following the pandemic. Several different parameters were assessed, and only 5 of them showed statistical significance. Stress, personal engagement, interpersonal communication efficiency and non-verbal cues were all lower with online education models. The only attribute that was scored higher by residents was network connectivity issues.Conclusions: An overwhelming majority of urology residents in the United States believe online education models should continue to be adopted once the pandemic is over. (AU)

Online surgical education adopted among urology residency programs in response to COVID-19: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the residents' perceptions of the, COVID-19 driven, newly implemented online learning systems adopted among accredited urology residency programs nationwide, and their sustainability following the pandemic era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was designed and dispersed to urology program coordinators and directors to distribute to their residents. In the survey, Online education models was the all-encompassing term to describe any form of resident education that occurred online. Anonymous surveys were exported from Survey Monkey and data was analyzed for statistical significance. RESULTS: Over 70% of urology residents agreed or were neutral to the statement that Online education models were equivalent to in-person learning. Only 13% of residents stated that online learning should not be continued following the pandemic. Several different parameters were assessed, and only 5 of them showed statistical significance. Stress, personal engagement, interpersonal communication efficiency and non-verbal cues were all lower with online education models. The only attribute that was scored higher by residents was network connectivity issues. CONCLUSIONS: An overwhelming majority of urology residents in the United States believe Online education models should continue to be adopted once the pandemic is over.

[Online surgical education adopted among urology residency programs in response to COVID-19: A pilot study]. / La educación quirúrgica en línea implementada en los programas de residencia urológica como respuesta a la COVID-19: estudio piloto.

Objective: To understand the residents' perceptions of the, COVID-19 driven, newly implemented online learning systems adopted among accredited urology residency programs nationwide, and their sustainability following the pandemic era. Materials and methods: A survey was designed and dispersed to urology program coordinators and directors to distribute to their residents.In the survey, online education models was the all-encompassing term to describe any form of resident education that occurred online. Anonymous surveys were exported from Survey Monkey and data was analyzed for statistical significance. Results: Over 70% of urology residents agreed or were neutral to the statement that online education models were equivalent to in-person learning. Only 13% of residents stated that online learning should not be continued following the pandemic. Several different parameters were assessed, and only 5 of them showed statistical significance. Stress, personal engagement, interpersonal communication efficiency and non-verbal cues were all lower with online education models. The only attribute that was scored higher by residents was network connectivity issues. Conclusions: An overwhelming majority of urology residents in the United States believe online education models should continue to be adopted once the pandemic is over.

Inteligencia artificial y simulación en urología / Artificial intelligence and simulation in urology

Introducción y objetivo: La inteligencia artificial (IA) está en pleno desarrollo, y su implementación en la medicina ha supuesto una mejora en la práctica clínica y quirúrgica. Una de sus múltiples aplicaciones es el entrenamiento quirúrgico, con la creación de programas que permiten evitar complicaciones y riesgos para el paciente. El objetivo de este artículo es analizar las ventajas de la IA aplicada al entrenamiento quirúrgico en urología.Material y métodosSe realiza una revisión de la literatura de los artículos publicados en inglés sobre la IA aplicada a la medicina, especialmente a la cirugía y a la adquisición de habilidades quirúrgicas.ResultadosEl entrenamiento quirúrgico ha evolucionado con el tiempo gracias a la IA. Se ha creado un modelo de aprendizaje quirúrgico en el que las habilidades se adquieren de forma gradual, evitando complicaciones al paciente. El uso de simuladores permite un aprendizaje progresivo en el que la cantidad y la complejidad de los procedimientos aumentan progresivamente. Adicionalmente, la IA se utiliza en pruebas de imagen para planificar cirugías o tratamientos.ConclusiónActualmente el uso de la IA en la práctica clínica diaria supone un avance en la medicina, y en particular en la formación quirúrgica. (AU)

Introduction and objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) is in full development and its implementation in medicine has led to an improvement in clinical and surgical practice. One of its multiple applications is surgical training, with the creation of programs that allow avoiding complications and risks for the patient. The aim of this article is to analyze the advantages of AI applied to surgical training in urology.Material and methodsA literary research is carried out to identify articles published in English regarding AI applied to medicine, especially in surgery and the acquisition of surgical skills.ResultsSurgical training has evolved over time thanks to AI. A model for surgical learning where skills are acquired in a progressive way while avoiding complications to the patient, has been created. The use of simulators allows a progressive learning, providing trainees with procedures that increase in number and complexity. On the other hand, AI is used in imaging tests for surgical or treatment planning.ConclusionCurrently, the use of AI in daily clinical practice has led to progress in medicine, specifically in surgical training. (AU)

Artificial intelligence and simulation in urology.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Artificial intelligence (AI) is in full development and its implementation in medicine has led to an improvement in clinical and surgical practice. One of its multiple applications is surgical training, with the creation of programs that allow avoiding complications and risks for the patient. The aim of this article is to analyze the advantages of AI applied to surgical training in urology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literary research is carried out to identify articles published in English regarding AI applied to medicine, especially in surgery and the acquisition of surgical skills. RESULTS: Surgical training has evolved over time thanks to AI. A model for surgical learning where skills are acquired in a progressive way while avoiding complications to the patient, has been created. The use of simulators allows a progressive learning, providing trainees with procedures that increase in number and complexity. On the other hand, AI is used in imaging tests for surgical or treatment planning. CONCLUSION: Currently, the use of AI in daily clinical practice has led to progress in medicine, specifically in surgical training.

Valor pronóstico de la citología urinaria en la recidiva del carcinoma urotelial vesical tras la cistectomía radical / Prognostic value of urinary cytology for detecting urothelial carcinoma recurrence after radical cystectomy

Introducción: Las recidivas del carcinoma urotelial (CaU) en uretra o en el tracto urinario superior (TUS), tras una cistectomía radical (CR) son infrecuentes (4-6%), y su diagnóstico suele ocurrir en los 2 primeros años. Actualmente, no existen claras recomendaciones para la detección de recidivas en el urotelio remanente (UR), aunque se sabe que su detección precoz ofrece beneficios en la supervivencia. Nuestro objetivo es determinar el valor diagnóstico de la citología urinaria (CU) para la detección de recidivas en el UR y calcular su impacto como método de diagnóstico precoz en la supervivencia.Material y métodosRevisión retrospectiva de pacientes intervenidos de CR por CaU entre 2008-2016, con un seguimiento mayor de 24 meses.ResultadosSe incluyeron 142 pacientes. En una mediana de seguimiento de 68,5 meses, 9 pacientes (6,3%) presentaron recidivas en el UR (uretra: 4, TUS: 4, sincrónica: uno). La sensibilidad de la CU para el diagnóstico de recidivas en el TUS fue del 20% y la especificidad del 96%. No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre la supervivencia global y la supervivencia cáncer específica entre pacientes según el resultado de la CU.ConclusiónLas recidivas en el UR tras una CR son infrecuentes, y en nuestro estudio, hemos encontrado una baja sensibilidad para el diagnóstico de estas con CU. Por estas razones, no consideramos que la CU aporta información útil para el seguimiento de estos pacientes. (AU)

Introduction: Urethral or upper urinary tract (UUT) recurrence of urothelial carcinoma (UC) after radical cystectomy (RC) are rare (4-6%), and their diagnosis usually occurs within the first two years. Although it is known that its early detection offers benefit in terms of survival, currently there are no clear recommendations for the detection of recurrence in the remnant urothelium (RU). Our aim is to determine the diagnostic value of urinary cytology for the detection of recurrences in the RU and to estimate its impact as an early diagnostic method on survival.Material and methodsRetrospective review of patients who underwent RC for urothelial carcinoma between 2008-2016, with a follow-up of at least 24 months.ResultsThe study included 142 patients. In a median follow-up of 68.5 months, nine patients (6.3%) presented recurrences in the RU (urethra: four, UUT: four, synchronous: one). The sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology for the diagnosis of UUT recurrences were 20% and 96%, respectively. No significant differences were found between overall survival and cancer-specific survival among patients according to the urinary cytology results.ConclusionRecurrences in the RU after RC are infrequent; our study has shown that urinary cytology offers a low sensitivity for their diagnoses. For these reasons, we do not consider that urinary cytology provides useful information for surveillance of these patients. (AU)