Estenosis traqueal por ectasia del tronco braquiocefálico derecho / Tracheal stenosis due to ectasia of the right brachiocephalic trunk

No disponible

Long-term clinical experience with the Omnicarbon prosthetic valve.

BACKGROUND: From February 1985 to December 1994, 781 Omnicarbon valve prostheses were implanted in 647 patients. These were 357 male and 290 female patients with a mean age of 53.5+/-10.5 years (range, 4 to 78 years). Before operation, 81% of the patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, 16% were in class II, and only 3% were in class I. METHODS: There were 227 aortic valve replacements (AVR) (35%), 286 mitral valve replacements (MVR) (44%), and 134 double-valve replacements (DVR) (21%) (AVR + MVR). Follow-up was 96.3% complete and consisted of 2,746 patient-years (mean follow-up, 4.6 years, and maximum follow-up, 10.7 years). RESULTS: Hospital mortality rates were 7.0% for AVR, 8.0% for MVR, and 8.2% for DVR. The annualized rate of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was 0.8% per patient-year, and thromboembolism occurred at a rate of 0.7% per patient-year. No structural failure was observed during 10-year follow-up. Twenty-one instances of nonstructural dysfunction (two, pannus growth, and 19, dehiscence) of the Omnicarbon valve occurred in 20 patients, an incidence of 0.8% per patient-year. Hemolytic anemia was observed only in the presence of valvular dehiscence (6 of 19). Eight patients (0.3% per patient-year) had development of prosthetic valve endocarditis (4, AVR; 2, MVR; and 2 DVR). At the end of 10 years of follow-up, 91% of the survivors were in New York Heart Association class I or II. The overall survival rate at 10 years was 82.5%+/-2.6% (85.0%+/-3.9%, AVR; 81.0%+/-4.1%, MVR; and 82.5%+/-2.6%, DVR). Considering only valve-related deaths, the survival rate at 10 years was 91.9%+/-2.4% (90.0%+/-2.7%, AVR; 93.1%+/-3.8%, MVR; and 90.0%+/-1.8%, DVR). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical results over a 10-year follow-up are excellent with the Omnicarbon prosthesis.

[Predictive variables of early mortality after orthotopic heart transplant in adults]. / Variables predictoras de mortalidad precoz tras el trasplante cardíaco ortotópico en adultos.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to analyze some variables of donors, recipients and surgical procedures in order to discover factors that could predict mortality during the early stage (< 30 days) of orthotopic heart transplants. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 125 consecutive orthotopic heart transplants in adults were analyzed. The average age was 51 +/- 11 (range: 12-67), 109 (87%) were men, 16 were women (13%). Two groups were compared: 15 patients who died within 30 days after heart transplant and 110 who survived during that period. Immunosuppressive protocol: preoperative: Cyclosporin + Azathioprine. Intraoperative: Methylprednisolone Postoperative: Methylprednisolone (first 24 h), antilymphocyte monoclonal antibodies (7-10 days after heart transplant) + Cyclosporin + Azathioprine + Corticoids. The following parameters of the recipient were analyzed: sex, age, weight, size, thoracic perimeter, pretransplant cardiopathy, previous thoracic operations, functional stage or need for catecholamines during the days prior to the transplant, pulmonary artery pressure and resistance, history of systemic arterial hypertension, elevation of creatinine, blood type, urgent transplant indication, receptor/donor weight relationship. The following parameters of donors and operation were analyzed: sex, age, weight, thoracic perimeter, period in intensive care unit, dose of dopamine and dobutamine, blood type, origin of the organ, cause of death, ischaemia time, cardiopulmonary by-pass time and cardioplegia type. RESULTS: The rate of early mortality was 12%. The univariate analysis showed differences in: prior cardiovascular surgery, receptor blood type, need for urgent transplantation, pulmonary artery resistance > 2.5 Wood Units, cardiopulmonary by-pass time, weight relationship between receptor and donor. The death cause of the donor proved significant. On multivariate analysis, the following parameters independently predicted early mortality: history of operation with extracorporeal circulation, high pulmonary artery resistance, urgent transplant, receptor/donor weight relation and time of extracorporeal circulation. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the results of our experience can help to stratify the risk in the orthotopic heart transplant recipient and even to contraindicate the procedure in some cases showing an accumulation of poor prognostic factors in borderline recipients.