Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Breast J ; 27(10): 781-786, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34263505

RESUMO

A case report of bilateral primary angiosarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was presented. A routine diagnostic mammography and ultrasound examinations indicated abnormalities in both breasts of the patient, confirmed on MRI as large bilateral masses. Core needle biopsy revealed angiosarcoma G1. The treatment agreed during the interdisciplinary meeting involved chemotherapy combined with simultaneous blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors, followed by bilateral simple mastectomy. This case highlights the importance of a patient-focused care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Hemangiossarcoma , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Hemangiossarcoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemangiossarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Hemangiossarcoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Mastectomia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Propranolol/uso terapêutico
2.
Pol J Radiol ; 86: e159-e164, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33828627

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most common cause of death from neoplastic disease in women. Among all breast anatomy types, glandular type is the most problematic concerning evaluation. While digital mammography still remains the basic diagnostic tool, one must be aware of its limitations in dense breasts. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has greatly improved sensitivity, its specificity is low. Moreover, there are contraindications for MRI for some patients, so a substitute has been searched for. This study was performed to check if contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) can be a viable option for patients with dense breasts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 121 patients with abnormalities detected on base-line diagnostic imaging (ultrasound or mammography). The patients had subsequent examinations, both CESM and MRI performed within a maximum 2-month time interval. The sensitivity and specificity of both methods in the whole group as well as in specific breast structure types were measured and compared. RESULTS: Contrast enhancement was visible in all 121 cases on MRI, while on CESM lack of enhancement was noted in 13 cases. All of those 13 lesions turned out to be benign. There were 40 (33%) benign and 81 (69%) malignant tumours. The analysed group included 53 (44%) glandular type breast patients, 39 (32%) mixed type, and 29 (23%) fatty type. Although MRI proved to be slightly more effective in dense breasts, both methods showed similar results in the whole study group. CONCLUSION: CESM can be used with confidence in patients with glandular breast type when MRI is not available or there are reported contraindications to MRI.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...