Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 29(9): 1435-9, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26043648

RESUMO

AIM: Our aim was to assess the incidence and risk factors of the puerperal genital hematomas (PGH). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed recorded cases of PGH at Zekai Tahir Burak Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between January 2010 and 2014. Next three patients were chosen as control group. RESULTS: There were 47 cases of PGH with an incidence of 1 in 762 deliveries. Patients with PGH were younger, more likely to be nulliparous and had a greater weight gain during pregnancy than the control group. Patients with PGH had a longer first and second stage of labor than the control group. Mediolateral episiotomy and operative delivery were more frequently performed in patients with PGH than the control group. Neonates born to mothers with PGH were heavier than the control group (3525 ± 428 versus 3325 ± 579; p = 0.031). In the logistic regression model, nulliparity (OR: 8.68, 95% CI = 2.96-25.3), instrumental delivery (OR: 7.96, 95% CI = 1.37-49.0) and mediolateral episiotomy (OR: 6.67, 95% CI = 2.61-17.1) were factors which had an independent impact on risk of PGH. CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparity, instrumental delivery and mediolateral episiotomy are the main risk factors for hematomas.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/epidemiologia , Hematoma/epidemiologia , Transtornos Puerperais/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Turquia/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 15: 202, 2015 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26330364

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to investigate risk factors for expulsion in immediate postplacental IUD insertion. We specifically sought to determine whether cesarean delivery before or during labor have an impact on IUD expulsion. METHODS: The study included 160 pregnant women for immediate IUD insertion following vaginal or cesarean delivery. Three groups of patients were recruited: Patients who underwent pre-planned cesarean delivery (group 1, n: 51), patients who underwent cesarean delivery during active labor (group 2, n: 47), patients who delivered vaginally (group 3, n: 62). RESULTS: The cumulative expulsion rates were similar with a frequency of 8.7, 8.9 and 11.3% respectively in groups 1 to 3 (p > 0.05 in all pairwise comparisons). The rate of patients who had the IUD removed at 12th month was 4,3, 6.7 and 11.3% for groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively (p > 0.05 in all pairwise comparisons). Multiparity increased the risk of cumulative expulsion within 12 months by 2.1 fold (95% 1,03-4,37) in the logistic regression model. Previous vaginal deliveries or IUD use did not have an impact on the expulsion of the IUD. The risk of spontaneous expulsion was similar in patients whose IUD was placed after cesarean in the active and latent phase or after spontaneous vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of IUD expulsion are similar in patients who underwent cesarean section before and during labor and who delivered vaginally. Parity was the only factor independently associated with IUD expulsion.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Expulsão de Dispositivo Intrauterino/tendências , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Pós-Parto , Adulto , Cesárea/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Projetos Piloto , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Turquia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...