Does sunscreen use comply with official recommendations? Results of a nationwide survey in Germany.

BACKGROUND: The use of sunscreen can reduce the risk of UV-induced skin lesions. Health authorities have provided recommendations for the correct use of sunscreen use: Sufficient amount of sunscreen should be applied at least 30 min before the sun exposure and should be reapplied every 2 h. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to research the practice of sunscreen use in a population-based and representative sample in Germany. METHODS: For this cross-sectional survey, 3000 German residents aged 14-45 years were surveyed in standardized telephone interviews in 2018. Survey participants provided data on the frequency of sunscreen use in summer, timing of (re-)application and their skin characteristics. The data were weighted by age, sex, educational level and federal state to ensure the national representativeness of the sample. RESULTS: Overall, 79.4% of respondents used sunscreen always, often or sometimes when being exposed to the sun. However, 87.2% of sunscreen users did not follow the recommendations on timing of application, 59.5% did not comply with the timing of reapplication. We also saw, that people potentially used too little sunscreen. These data did not differ noticeably by skin types of participants. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed deficits in use of sunscreen in Germany, indicating that people here pay little attention to the recommendations of health authorities, regardless of their skin type. There is therefore an urgent need for targeted public information on this issue. Improving public knowledge on correct sunscreen use through educational campaigns or individual counselling by health professionals could be a first step.

[The use of sunglasses during leisure time and work : Lack of prevention of sun-induced eye damage]. / Die Nutzung von Sonnenbrillen in Freizeit und Beruf : Defizite in der Prävention sonnenbedingter Augenschäden.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at collecting representative national data on the use of sunglasses on sunny summer days during leisure time or work as well as identifying population and professional groups with a pronounced lack of preventive measures to avoid sun-induced eye damage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within the representative National Cancer Aid Monitoring, data on the use of sunglasses during leisure time was assessed among 3000 individuals aged 14-45 years in 2015, as well as on the use during outdoor work among 485 workers aged 14-45 years in 2016. Associations between the use of sunglasses and sociodemographic characteristics were assessed with the χ2-test. Additionally, descriptive and bivariate methods were used to assess connections between the use of sunglasses at work and each professional group. RESULTS: While more than half of the general population normally or often wear sunglasses on a sunny summer day, only one third of outdoor workers do so. While approximately every seventh individual surveyed never wears sunglasses during leisure time, among outdoor workers it is one out of three. The use during leisure time increases with age. DISCUSSION: Use of sunglasses during work could be supported by targeted information on UV-induced eye damage by ophthalmologists and company physicians with additional support from accident insurances and employers. Concerning preventive measures occupational groups such as landscapers, farmers and bricklayers who are strongly exposed to sunlight but rarely wear sunglasses are important groups.

Prevalence of sun-protective behaviour and intentional sun tanning in German adolescents and adults: results of a nationwide telephone survey.

BACKGROUND: The incidence rate of melanoma in the Caucasian population is rising worldwide. One of the major environmental risk factors for melanoma is the exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. To prevent skin damage caused by UV exposure, several organizations recommend wearing protective clothing, staying in the shade, avoiding the outdoors during midday and using sunscreen. OBJECTIVE: To provide representative data on factors associated with sun-protective behaviours and intentional sun exposure during summertime in the German population. METHODS: A population-based sample of 3000 German residents aged 14-45 years (response: 32.1%) was interviewed via telephone from October to December 2015. Survey participants provided data on the use of recommended sun-protective measures on a sunny summer day and their intentional sun exposure during summertime. Data were weighted by age, sex, educational level and federal state to ensure the national representativeness of the sample. RESULTS: Wearing long-sleeved clothes was the most frequently reported protective measure (53.9%), while wearing headgear was the least common (17.9%). Significantly lower frequencies of almost all recommended sun-protective measures were identified for males, participants between 14 and 25 years, those with an immigrant background and those with low levels of education. Using sun protection was positively associated with female gender (OR = 1.62), higher levels of education (ORhigh = 1.27), sunburn during childhood (OR = 1.33) and paying attention to healthy nutrition (OR = 1.64; all P < 0.05). Sun tanning behaviour was associated with female gender (OR = 1.42), younger age, lower level of education, sunbed use (OR = 5.24) and smoking status (OR = 1.50; all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: As individual sun-protective measures are easy to implement and provide effective protection against high-risk UV exposure, campaigns on skin cancer prevention in Germany should put a stronger focus on young adults, men, less educated individuals and those with immigration background.

First evaluation of the Behavioral Addiction Indoor Tanning Screener (BAITS) in a nationwide representative sample.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that indoor tanning may have addictive properties. However, many instruments for measuring indoor tanning addiction show poor validity and reliability. Recently, a new instrument, the Behavioral Addiction Indoor Tanning Screener (BAITS), has been developed. OBJECTIVES: To test the validity and reliability of the BAITS by using a multimethod approach. METHODS: We used data from the first wave of the National Cancer Aid Monitoring on Sunbed Use, which included a cognitive pretest (August 2015) and a Germany-wide representative survey (October to December 2015). In the cognitive pretest 10 users of tanning beds were interviewed and 3000 individuals aged 14-45 years were included in the representative survey. Potential symptoms of indoor tanning addiction were measured using the BAITS, a brief screening survey with seven items (answer categories: yes vs. no). Criterion validity was assessed by comparing the results of BAITS with usage parameters. Additionally, we tested internal consistency and construct validity. RESULTS: A total of 19·7% of current and 1·8% of former indoor tanning users were screened positive for symptoms of a potential indoor tanning addiction. We found significant associations between usage parameters and the BAITS (criterion validity). Internal consistency (reliability) was good (Kuder-Richardson-20, 0·854). The BAITS was shown to be a homogeneous construct (construct validity). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other short instruments measuring symptoms of a potential indoor tanning addiction, the BAITS seems to be a valid and reliable tool. With its short length and the binary items the BAITS is easy to use in large surveys.

[Prevalence, risk groups, and reasons for sunbed use in Germany]. / Prävalenz, Risikogruppen und Motive der Solariennutzung in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Ultraviolet (UV) radiation of sunbeds has been classified carcinogenic by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Unlike in other countries the available data on the important risk factor has been lacking until recently in Germany. OBJECTIVES: The SUN-Study 2012 (Sunbed-Use: Needs for Action Study) aimed at identifying epidemiological prevalence data concerning this completely preventable risk factor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 4,851 participants aged 14-45 years were selected from the German population in a representative manner and were surveyed via standardized telephone interviews. The survey period was split into a summer and a winter wave in order to take possible season effects into account. RESULTS: Four out of 10 Germans aged 14-45 years (39.2 %; 95 % CI 37.8-40.6 %) have ever used a sunbed. Within the last year 14.6 % (95 % CI 13.6-15.6 %) visited a sunbed. Current users reported six visits per year on average and every twentieth reported a family history of cutaneous malignant melanoma in first-degree relatives. More than 5 % of minors currently used sunbeds despite the nationwide ban, mostly at unsupervised locations. Half of those minors did not know about the legal ban of sunbed use for minors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study proves that sunbed use which is an important risk factor for skin cancer is widely used. Moreover, considerable information deficits about health risks exist among the German population.

[Differences in the Provision of Lifestyle Counseling for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Between Urban and Rural Regions in Germany. Findings from a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians]. / Stadt-Land-Unterschiede im Angebot von Lebensstilberatung zur Prävention kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen in der Hausarztpraxis. Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Hausärztebefragung.

AIMS: In Germany, shortages in primary care physicians (PCPs) were reported in some rural regions. In this paper, we explored if regional differences in the distribution of PCPs are associated with the provision of lifestyle counseling in primary care. METHODS: In a nationwide study, a total of 4,074 randomly selected PCPs were asked about provision of lifestyle counseling to their patients, their attitudes, and perceived barriers. RESULTS: PCPs from rural regions provided less frequently lifestyle advice for cardiovascular disease prevention. Compared to their colleagues in urban areas, more PCPs from rural regions believed that were inadequately qualified for the lifestyle counseling and that they had been less successful in helping patients to modify their lifestyles. Physicians from rural practices named more often than PCPs from urban practices a lack of adherence by the patients (65 vs. 57%), insufficient opportunities to collaborate with providers of preventive services (62 vs. 55%), and lack of time (66 vs. 52%; all p<0.001) as barriers in providing patients with lifestyle counseling. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the expected increased shortages in PCPs in rural regions, the results show the need for targeted interventions for improving lifestyle counseling in rural practices.

[Resident Gynaecologists' Attitudes towards the Inclusion of the Screening for Gestational Diabetes into the Maternity Directive: A Qualitative Study]. / Die Aufnahme des Screenings auf Gestationsdiabetes mellitus in die Mutterschaftsrichtlinien aus Sicht niedergelassener Gynäkologen: Eine qualitative Studie.

BACKGROUND: In March 2012, the screening for gestational diabetes was included as a 2-step screening into the German maternity directive. However, up to now it is unclear what resident gynaecologists, who are affected directly by this change in the maternity directive, think about the inclusion of the screening and the kind of screening introduced. METHODS: In order to approach this topic from a scientific point of view, gynaecologists in the German cities Mannheim, Ludwigshafen, and Heidelberg were interviewed face-to-face using a semi-structured interview guide with open-ended questions (mean interview length: 33:12 min). The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim (191 pages), coded by 2 independent reviewers, and analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The majority of the gynaecologists supported the introduction of the screening into the maternity directives. However, some gynaecologists felt that this amendment is not strong enough criticising the GCT with 50 g glucose. Many gynaecologists would prefer an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT, 75 g glucose). But there were also some gynaecologists who thought that the OGTT would strain pregnant women too much and thus deemed it unsuitable for a screening. Additionally, the gynaecologists named difficulties concerning the implementation of the test such as, for example, the non-availability of a ready-made glucose syrup for the GCT and the delayed introduction of billing codes. DISCUSSION: In the framework of this qualitative study, resident gynaecologists--the main actors in the conduct of the screening--had the possibility to offer their opinion on this current topic. The results provide a first insight into the conduct of the screening and may serve as a basis for larger, quantitative studies.