[Pulmonary Rehabilitation: From Theory to Practice]. / Rehabilitación respiratoria: del arte a la evidencia.

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been seen to be useful not only in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but also in other non-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease respiratory diseases. It is highly effective in improving dyspnea, exercise tolerance, and health-related quality of life, and is supported by a high level of evidence and grade of recommendation. In recent years, PR has been shown to be equally effective in both the hospital and home setting, and can even be used in telemedicine. The recommended timing of PR after an exacerbation has also changed following evidence that early intervention is more beneficial and has no negative impact on side effects. However, to achieve maximum effect while avoiding risk, each patient must be evaluated by the PR team, and rehabilitation must be tailored to their needs and capabilities. In recent years, new, simpler strategies have been put forward to give all potential candidates access to PR. This approach should help achieve greater adherence to rehabilitation programs and maintain long-term benefits, primarily by influencing patient lifestyles and encouraging physical activity.

Timing of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Readmitted Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), started during hospitalization or within the first month after discharge, has been shown to reduce exacerbations and improve health-related-quality of life (HRQoL) and exercise capacity. However, no randomized clinical trials (RCT) have compared the efficacy of PR started during hospitalization (DHPR) to PR initiated one month post-hospitalization (PHPR). We conducted an RCT to compare DHPR to PHPR in severe patients with COPD readmitted for exacerbations in a tertiary hospital setting. Patients were randomized to receive three months of DHPR or PHPR. Outcomes were assessed at completion of the PR programme and at months 3 and 9. A total of 53 patients (26 DHPR and 27 PHPR) were included. There were no between-group differences in the number of exacerbations (mean, 3.62 vs. 3.04 in the DHPR and PHPR groups, respectively; p = 0.403). Dyspnea in activities of daily living, exercise capacity, and all HRQoL parameters improved in the PHPR group. In the DHPR group, improvement was observed only for some HRQoL parameters. All gains in both groups were lost during follow-up. More adverse events were observed in the DHPR group (20 vs 5, p = 0.023), although none of these were clinically significant. In this sample of patients with severe COPD readmitted to the hospital for exacerbations, both approaches to PR were safe, but PHPR yielded better outcomes overall. These findings suggest that, PR should be initiated in patients with severe COPD only after hospital discharge when the patients' clinical condition has stabilized.

Rehabilitación respiratoria / Pulmonary Rehabilitation

La rehabilitación respiratoria (RR) ha demostrado mejorar la disnea, la capacidad de esfuerzo y la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). En otras enfermedades distintas de la EPOC también ha mostrado beneficios, aunque el grado de evidencia es menor. Los componentes fundamentales de los programas de RR son el entrenamiento muscular, la educación y la fisioterapia respiratoria, siendo aconsejable también contemplar la terapia ocupacional, el soporte psicosocial y la intervención nutricional. Los programas domiciliarios han demostrado igual eficacia que los hospitalarios. La duración de los programas de RR no debe ser inferior a 8 semanas o 20 sesiones. La RR iniciada precozmente, incluso durante las exacerbaciones, ha demostrado ser eficaz y segura. La utilización de oxígeno o ventilación no invasiva durante el entrenamiento es controvertida y dependiente de la situación del paciente. En el momento actual desconocemos cuál es la mejor estrategia para mantener los beneficios de la RR a largo plazo. Una mayor duración de los programas o la telemedicina podrían ser claves para prolongar los resultados conseguidos

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to improve dyspnea, exercise capacity and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). PR has also shown benefits in diseases other than COPD but the level of evidence is lower. The fundamental components of PR programs are muscle training, education and chest physiotherapy. Occupational therapy, psychosocial support and nutritional intervention should also be considered. Home programs have been shown to be as effective as hospital therapy. The duration of rehabilitation programs should not be less than 8 weeks or 20 sessions. Early initiation of PR, even during exacerbations, has proven safe and effective. The use of oxygen or noninvasive ventilation during training is controversial and dependent on the patient's situation. At present, the best strategy for maintaining the benefits of PR in the long term is unknown. Longer PR programs or telemedicine could play a key role in extending the results obtained

Pulmonary rehabilitation. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR).

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to improve dyspnea, exercise capacity and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). PR has also shown benefits in diseases other than COPD but the level of evidence is lower. The fundamental components of PR programs are muscle training, education and chest physiotherapy. Occupational therapy, psychosocial support and nutritional intervention should also be considered. Home programs have been shown to be as effective as hospital therapy. The duration of rehabilitation programs should not be less than 8 weeks or 20 sessions. Early initiation of PR, even during exacerbations, has proven safe and effective. The use of oxygen or noninvasive ventilation during training is controversial and dependent on the patient's situation. At present, the best strategy for maintaining the benefits of PR in the long term is unknown. Longer PR programs or telemedicine could play a key role in extending the results obtained.

Rehabilitación respiratoria y fisioterapia respiratoria. Un buen momento para su impulso / Pulmonary rehabilitation and respiratory physiotherapy: time to push ahead

No disponible

No disponible