The effect of hemispheric lesion location on trunk control.

BACKGROUND: Trunk control is the basic component of postural control, and achieving trunk control is a complex process that can be achieved by dynamically building and maintaining neuromuscular function. Lateropulsion, which is also defined as the body falling to one side, is considered an important condition that is frequently encountered after stroke and affects trunk control. It is known that there are differences in the regulation of postural control and trunk control according to hemispheric localization. We had a very specific group of patients and tried to find out the outcomes prospectively in this study. METHODS: The patients were divided into 2 groups those with right hemisphere lesions (Group 1) and those with left hemisphere lesions (Group 2). Comorbidity and cognitive function were evaluated using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CMI) and Standardized Mini-Mental State Test (SMMSE). Activities of daily living were evaluated using the Turkish version of the Modified Barthel Index (MBI). The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement Instrument (STREAM) test was used to assess trunk control and the Brunnstrom (BS) test was used to assess motor functions. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 in terms of STREAM in lower extremity scores were higher in Group 2 (P < .05). The number of patients in BS lower extremity Stages IV-VI was higher in Group 1 and Group 2 (P < .05). It was determined that upper extremity, lower extremity and Total STREAM scores and BS Hand stage in Group 2 were significantly higher than Group 1 in patients with total middle cerebral artery (MCA) affected(P < .05). CONCLUSION: It was determined that trunk control was more affected in patients with right hemispheric lesions. Additionally, trunk control is significantly affected in patients with total MCA lesions.

Effects of the combined treatment of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation and levodopa on balance and mobility in Parkinson's disease.

Background and purpose:

Background and purpose – To evaluate the efficacy of the combined therapy of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) and dopaminergic medication on balance and mobility in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Eighteen PD patients under bilateral STN-DBS stimulation therapy, were enrolled in this study. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) was applied to assess the patients’ clinical characteristics. UPDRS part III postural instability/gait disorder (PIGD) scores (sum of items 3.9-3.13) and UPDRS part III postural stability item (item 3.12) were calculated separately. Patients were evaluated with Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, dual-task TUG test, and Forward Functional Reach (FFR) Test in two conditions: Stimulation-ON (stim-ON)/Medication-ON (Med-ON) and Stimulation-OFF (Stim-OFF)/Med-ON.

The mean age of patients was 59.5±9.1 (R: 41-71) years. The UPDRS part III total score and PIGD subsection score significantly improved after stimulation (p=0.001), but the postural instability item of the UPDRS part III did not change significantly (p=0.1). There were no significant differences between the Stim-ON/Med-ON and Stim-OFF/Med-ON conditions, in terms of total Mini-BESTest total scores, total BBS score, FFR test score (p>0.05 for all of them). TUG test was significantly improved in the Stim-ON/Med-ON condition compared to Stim-OFF/Med-ON condition (p=0.03), but DT-TUG test did not change (p=0.1). 

Combined bilateral STN-DBS and dopaminergic medication therapy had an additional improvement on motor symptoms and mobility performance, but not on balance and dual-task mobility.