Surveillance study on the tolerability and safety of Flebogamma® DIF (10% and 5% intravenous immunoglobulin) in adult and pediatric patients.

Direct comparisons of tolerability and safety of concentrated intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) versus less concentrated products are scarce. In this postauthorization, prospective, observational, multicenter study, a systematic comparison of 10% and 5% concentrations of Flebogamma® DIF IVIG was performed in both adult and pediatric patients treated with the studied IVIG products according to the approved indications under routine conditions. Dose of product administered, adverse events (AEs), physical assessments, laboratory tests, and concomitant therapy were analyzed. Patient recruitment in the 10% and 5% product groups was, respectively, 34 (32 analyzed, 13 of them children, receiving 130 IVIG infusions) and 35 (34 analyzed, receiving 135 IVIG infusions). Twenty-four infusions (18.5%; 95% CI: 11.8, 25.1) with the 10% product and 3 (2.2%; 95% CI: -0.3, 4.7) with the 5% product were associated with potentially treatment-related AEs (P < 0.0001). Nine patients (28.1%) infused with the 10% product and 3 (8.8%) infused with the 5% product presented, respectively, 33 and 8 treatment-related AEs (of which 7 and 6, respectively, were serious AEs, experienced by only three hypersensitive patients). The profile of AEs occurring with the infusion of 10% and 5% products were comparable. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were headache (n = 17, 3 patients; 15 episodes, 1 patient) and pyrexia (n = 6, 4 patients). In conclusion, no unpredictable risk was detected for both Flebogamma DIF 10% and 5% concentrations, which were therefore deemed as safe and well-tolerated IVIG in the studied population. The frequency of infusions associated with treatment-related AEs was lower with the 5% concentration.

Reduced proliferation and colony formation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after dual targeting of EGFR and hedgehog pathways.

PURPOSE: The hedgehog signalling pathway (Hh) is frequently active in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Overexpressed Hh associates with poor prognosis. The Hh inhibitor vismodegib targets smoothened, and based on molecular data, may prevent resistance to EGFR targeting. METHODS: To elucidate potential roles of vismodegib in HNSCC therapy, its sole effects and those combined with cisplatin, docetaxel, and cetuximab on HNSCC cell lines were assessed by MTT metabolisation and BrdU incorporation. Colony formation (CF) of primary HNSCC cells was studied utilizing the FLAVINO-protocol. Combinatory effects were analysed regarding antagonism, additivity or synergism. Associations between the ex vivo detected mode of action of vismodegib with other treatments related to patient characteristics were assessed and progression-free survival (PFS) in patient groups compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Vismodegib suppressed BrdU incorporation significantly stronger than MTT turnover; CF was significantly inhibited at ≥20 µM vismodegib while concentrations <20 µM acted hormetic. Combining 20 µM vismodegib plus docetaxel (T), cisplatin (P), and cetuximab (E), additively enhanced anti-tumoral activity in HNSCC samples from patients with superior PFS highlighting a potential role for ex-vivo testing of this combination for use as a prognostic classifier. CONCLUSION: We provide ex-vivo evidence for vismodegib's potential in HNSCC therapies, especially if combined with cetuximab, cisplatin and docetaxel.

Bendamustin-Rituximab Combination Is a Safe and Effective, Ambulatory Treatment for Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Retrospective Real-world Analysis by Age from a German Registry and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Treatment recommendations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are based upon selected, otherwise healthy study populations mostly under 72 years of age. The Project group Internistic Oncology (PIO) embarked on an analysis of the 'real-world' safety and efficacy of bendamustine with and without rituximab in unselected outpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, prospectively stratified, retrospective study was conducted to determine routine feasibility, toxicity, and response rates obtained by bendamustine with and without rituximab in a random population of mostly elderly patients with CLL. Records were obtained from 775 patients with CLL from 60 private medical oncology practices. Informed consent was obtained prior to study participation. The median observation time was 28 months. Patients were stratified according to age, and treatment. Response criteria and statistics followed international guidelines adopted by the "German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group". RESULTS: Overall, 57.5% of patients were over 70 (range=36-95) years old. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and age influenced the total dose given, decreasing by 20% between ECOG 0 and 3, and by 15% above 80 years old. Response rates did not differ between the ages of 60 to 80 years, with an overall remission rate for bendamustine of 83%, and for the combination therapy of 89%, decreasing above the age of 80 years. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 25% of 775 patients, and grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse events in 9.55% (n=74), not interfering with the treatment. CONCLUSION: Bendamustine with and without rituximab was associated with high activity and tolerability, irrespective of age and risk factors. The median overall survival was 64 months with a 3-year survival rate of 72%; progression-free survival was 30.6 months, and the 3 year PFS was 43%. The good tolerability and feasibility of bendamustine with and without rituximab, in particular for the elderly population with CLL argues for it being a safe outpatient treatment.

Post-marketing observational study on 5% intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with secondary immunodeficiency and recurrent serious bacterial infections.

Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia is one of the factors responsible for the increased susceptibility to infection in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This study assessed the therapeutic results, concomitant medication and tolerance of administering 5% intravenous immunoglobulin, secondary immunodeficiency and recurrent serious bacterial infections. A single center, post-marketing, observational clinical study was performed on 10 patients with a variety of hematological malignancies (CLL, follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma, IgM-secreting immunocytoma, IgA plasmacytoma and myelodysplastic syndrome/non-Hodgkin lymphoma) who had been infused with IVIG from June 1994 to May 2009. The clinical benefit of IVIG was assessed by comparing the incidence of bacterial infections before and after starting this therapy. Plasma immunoglobulin concentrations and relevant hematological variables were recorded. For safety assessment, adverse events were monitored. The standard IVIG dosage was approximately 0.35 g/kg body weight every 3-4 weeks. Most patients had normal IgG trough values of >600 mg/dL during the IVIG treatment period. The rate of bacterial infections was reduced from 2.4 per patient in the 3 months before IVIG to 0.7 (0-1.5) per patient per year during IVIG treatment. All patients received concomitant medication, mainly anticancer and anti-anemia therapy (100%). No serious adverse events related to IVIG were observed. The frequency of at least one minor adverse reaction was 1.44% (8/556 infusions). In conclusion, the investigated IVIG preparation was well tolerated and clinically beneficial in reducing the long term rate of serious bacterial infections in patients receiving concomitant treatment for malignant diseases.