RESUMO
Purpose: Cystoscopy (rigid/flexible [FC]) is the standard surveillance tool for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Nevertheless, it has its drawbacks. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of microscopic hematuria (MH), abdominal ultrasonography (US), and urine cytology (UC) as potential substitutes for FC in patients with T1-low-grade (T1-LG) NMIBC. Methods: Over a 12-month period, patients attending our tertiary referral center for T1-LG NMIBC follow-up underwent urine analysis for MH and UC, and then US and FC were performed as outpatient surveillance procedures. Those with positive findings underwent inpatient rigid cystoscopy under anesthesia and biopsy. The negative predictive values (NPV) and sensitivity of different combinations of MH, UC, US, and FC were compared with the standard histopathology. Results: In 218 evaluated patients, FC had the highest NPV (97.9%). However, this figure showed no statistically significant difference if compared with the combination of negative MH and US (93.8%) (difference = 0.04, p = 0.1) or the combination of MH, US, and UC (94.9%) (difference = 0.03, p = 0.2). The reported sensitivity results were similarly comparable between FC (94.2%) and the aforementioned combinations (90.4% and 92.3%; differences: 0.038 and 0.019; p = 0.4 and 0.7, respectively). Conclusions: During the surveillance of NMIBC for patients diagnosed with T1-LG disease, the combination of MH/US has comparable sensitivity and NPV with FC. This non-invasive combination could be considered the first station that might preclude the need for FC in a considerable percentage of this group of patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of serum fatty acid-binding protein-4 (FABP-4) as a surrogate of obesity and metabolic syndrome in the prediction of the outcome of prostate biopsy. METHODS: A prospective pilot study was conducted for patients undergoing prostate needle biopsy (PNB) for clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa) between June 2016 and August 2017. Fifty consecutive patients with biopsy-proven PCa were included as study group and 50 consecutive patients with negative biopsy were included as a control group. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) to compare the accuracy of the different parameters in the diagnosis as well as the presence of high-grade PCa (Gleason score 8-9) at PNB. Predictors of the outcome were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: FABP-4 (AUC: 0.75; P < 0.001) and PSA-density (AUC: 0.84; P < 0.001) were the most accurate to detect PCa at PNB. On multivariate analysis, FABP-4 > 22.5 ng/ml (OR: 16.6; 95% CI 2.8-98; P = 0.002) and PSA-density > 0.38 ng/ml/ml OR: 17.7; 95% CI 5.3-59; P < 0.001) were independent predictors of PCa detection. Regarding high-grade PCa at PNB, FABP-4 (AUC: 0.79; P < 0.001) and %Free-PSA (AUC: 0.75; P < 0.001) were the most accurate. Independent predictors of high-grade PCa were FABP-4 > 32.3 ng/ml OR: 9.2; 95% CI 1.8-45; P = 0.006) and %Free-PSA ≤ 21.9 (OR: 5.5; 95% CI 1.1-27; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: FABP-4 is an independent predictor for both the diagnosis and high-grade Gleason score at PNB. This novel biomarker might have a promising role in optimizing PNB outcomes.
