RESUMO
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic, neurodegenerative movement disorder, whose symptoms have a negative impact on quality of life and functionality. Although its main treatment is pharmacological, non-pharmacological aids such as the dynamic elastomeric fabric orthosis (DEFO) merit an evaluation. Our objective is to assess the DEFO in upper limb (UL) functional mobility and in the quality of life of PD patients. A total of 40 patients with PD participated in a randomized controlled crossover study, and were assigned to a control group (CG) and to an experimental group (EG). Both groups used the DEFO for two months, the experimental group the first two months of the study and the control group the last two. Motor variables were measured in the ON and OFF states at the baseline assessment and at two months. Differences from the baseline assessment were observed in some motor items of the Kinesia assessment, such as rest tremor, amplitude, rhythm or alternating movements in the ON and OFF states with and without orthosis. No differences were found in the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) or the PD quality-of-life questionnaire. The DEFO improves some motor aspects of the UL in PD patients but this does not translate to the amelioration of the standard of functional and quality-of-life scales.
Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Cross-Over , TremorRESUMO
Objetivo: Comparar la ley española de eutanasia y suicidio asistido con las que existen en otros países.DiseñoRevisión sistemática de la bibliografía.Fuentes de datosSe buscaron en Medline/PubMed, EMBASE y Biblioteca Cochrane los estudios que contuvieran en su título o resumen los descriptores «eutanasia» o «suicidio asistido» y además «legislación» o «ley», entre 2002 y final de 2020.Selección de estudios La búsqueda encontró 1.647 estudios y tras su cribado se valoraron 663, de los cuales 30 se incluyeron en la revisión. Se rechazaron estudios en los que solo constaran opiniones o no aportaran datos sobre la eutanasia/suicidio asistido en los países que los tienen regulados.Extracción de datosSe registraron los criterios que regulan la aceptación o rechazo de una petición de eutanasia o suicidio asistido en España y en los demás países en que están despenalizados.ResultadosLas regulaciones de la eutanasia en el mundo pueden agruparse en tres: leyes que permiten la eutanasia y el suicidio asistido (Países Bajos, Bélgica, Canadá, algunos estados de Australia, Nueva Zelanda, España), en las que la ley solo permite el suicidio asistido (EE.UU.) y en las que se admite únicamente el suicidio asistido y en base a sentencias judiciales, sin legislación específica (Suiza, Alemania).ConclusionesAunque hay diferencias, las leyes a las que más se asemeja la ley española de eutanasia son las de Países Bajos y Bélgica, por lo que es previsible que la casuística de eutanasia y sus cifras en España se parezcan en el futuro a las de estos países.
Objective: To compare the Spanish law on euthanasia and assisted suicide with those that exist in other countries.DesignSystematic review of the bibliography.Data sourcesMedline/PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that contained in their title or abstract the descriptors «euthanasia» or «assisted suicide» and also «legislation» or «law», between 2002 and the end of 2020.Study selectionThe search found 1647 studies and after screening 663 were assessed, of which 30 were included in the review. Studies that only contained opinions or did not provide data on euthanasia/assisted suicide in the countries that have them regulated were rejected.Data extractionWe registered the criteria that regulate the acceptance or rejection of a request for euthanasia or assisted suicide in Spain and in the other countries where they are decriminalized.ResultsThe euthanasia regulations in the world can be grouped into three groups: laws that allow euthanasia and assisted suicide (Netherlands, Belgium, some states of Australia, New Zealand, Spain), those in which the law only allows assisted suicide (USA) and those in which only assisted suicide is admitted and based on court decisions, without specific legislation (Switzerland, Germany).ConclusionsAlthough there are differences, the laws that the Spanish euthanasia law most closely resembles are those of the Netherlands and Belgium, so it is foreseeable that the casuistry of euthanasia and its figures in Spain will resemble that of those countries in the future.
Assuntos
Humanos , Ciências da Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Eutanásia/legislação & jurisprudência , Legislação como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the Spanish law on euthanasia and assisted suicide with those that exist in other countries. DESIGN: Systematic review of the bibliography. DATA SOURCES: Medline/PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that contained in their title or abstract the descriptors «euthanasia¼ or «assisted suicide¼ and also «legislation¼ or «law¼, between 2002 and the end of 2020. STUDY SELECTION: The search found 1647 studies and after screening 663 were assessed, of which 30 were included in the review. Studies that only contained opinions or did not provide data on euthanasia/assisted suicide in the countries that have them regulated were rejected. DATA EXTRACTION: We registered the criteria that regulate the acceptance or rejection of a request for euthanasia or assisted suicide in Spain and in the other countries where they are decriminalized. RESULTS: The euthanasia regulations in the world can be grouped into three groups: laws that allow euthanasia and assisted suicide (Netherlands, Belgium, some states of Australia, New Zealand, Spain), those in which the law only allows assisted suicide (USA) and those in which only assisted suicide is admitted and based on court decisions, without specific legislation (Switzerland, Germany). CONCLUSIONS: Although there are differences, the laws that the Spanish euthanasia law most closely resembles are those of the Netherlands and Belgium, so it is foreseeable that the casuistry of euthanasia and its figures in Spain will resemble that of those countries in the future.
Assuntos
Eutanásia , Suicídio Assistido , Alemanha , Humanos , Países Baixos , EspanhaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spain has been one of the countries heavily stricken by COVID-19. But this epidemic has not affected all regions equally. We analyzed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital stroke admissions and in-hospital mortality in tertiary referral hospitals from North-West Spain. METHODS: Spanish multicenter retrospective observational study based on data from tertiary hospitals of the NORDICTUS network. We recorded the number of patients admitted for ischemic stroke between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020, the number of IVT and EVT procedures, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: In the study period, 2737 patients were admitted with ischemic stroke. There was a decrease in the weekly mean admitted patients during the pandemic (124 vs. 173, p<0.001). In-hospital mortality of stroke patients increased significantly (9.9% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.003), but there were no differences in the proportion of IVT (17.3% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.405) or EVT (22% vs. 23%, p = 0.504). CONCLUSION: We found a decrease in the number of ischemic stroke admissions and an increase in in-hospital mortality during the COVID-19 epidemic in this large study from North-West Spain. There were regional changes within the network, not fully explained by the severity of the pandemic in different regions.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Idoso , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , COVID-19 , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Reperfusão , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
Aim To investigate the relationship between primary headache types and accomplished or attempted suicide in countries from all world regions. Methods Data were obtained using a questionnaire about suicide due to headache in a face-to-face interview with 203 physicians with expertise in headaches. They came from 48 countries, and from all continents. Results Primary headaches cause one suicide per 1,000,000 population each year (1% of the suicide rate due to all causes). Cluster headache and migraines account for 70-80% of them. Suicide attempts are 10 times more frequent than accomplished suicides. Cluster headache poses more risk than migraine. This risk is not often acknowledged, and is increased if there is previous psychiatric history. More than half of the physicians interviewed think it could be reduced with a more aggressive treatment of headaches. Conclusions Cluster headache and migraine are not always benign, and are the cause of the majority of suicides due to headache.