Medical costs of treatment and survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia in Belgium.

The advent of new cell-based immunotherapies for leukemia offers treatment possibilities for certain leukemia subgroups. The wider acceptability of these new technologies in clinical practice will depend on its impact on survival and costs. Due to the small patient groups who have received it, these aspects have remained understudied. This non-randomized single-center study evaluated medical costs and survival for acute myeloid leukemia between 2005 and 2010 in 50 patients: patients treated with induction and consolidation chemotherapy (ICT) alone; patients treated with ICT plus allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), which is the current preferred post-remission therapy in patients with intermediate- and poor-risk AML with few co-morbidities, and patients treated with ICT plus immunotherapy using autologous dendritic cells (DC) engineered to express the Wilms' tumor protein (WT1). Total costs including post- consolidation costs on medical care at the hematology ward and outpatient clinic, pharmaceutical prescriptions, intensive care ward, laboratory tests and medical imaging were analyzed. Survival was markedly better in HCT and DC. HCT and DC were more costly than ICT. The median total costs for HCT and DC were similar. These results need to be confirmed to enable more thorough cost-effectiveness analyses, based on observations from multicenter, randomized clinical trials and preferably using quality-adjusted life-years as an outcome measure.

Medical and surgical management of paraneoplastic pyoderma gangrenosum--a case report and review of the literature.

We present a case of a 44-year-old male with pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) presenting simultaneously with diagnosis of acute leukemia. His skin disease was stabilized with corticosteroids and most lesions cleared after chemotherapy-induced remission of the malignancy, but the largest lesion remained necrotic. Surgical treatment of the large necrotic ulcer included debridement followed by split-thickness skin graft while maintaining corticoid therapy. Unfortunately, relapse of the pyoderma gangrenosum with bullous lesions heralded relapse of the ultimately fatal malignancy. This case illustrates: (1) PG presenting simultaneously with a haematologic malignancy (2) Relapse with atypical bullous lesions with return of the malignancy and (3) The use of surgical modalities in managing patients with PG, a disease notorious for surgical complications.

The quality of oral anticoagulant therapy and recurrent venous thrombotic events in the Leiden Thrombophilia Study.

BACKGROUND: The International Normalized Ratio (INR) target range is a relatively narrow range in which the efficacy of oral anticoagulant treatment, i.e. prevention of extension and recurrence of thrombosis, is balanced with the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Over the years, different INR target ranges have been implemented for individual indications, depending on their thrombotic potential. In most of the studies defining these INR targets, the treatment of the patients was aimed at a certain INR range, but in the analysis no account was taken of the time that the patients spent within this range in reality. METHODS: The Leiden Thrombophilia Study (LETS) is a population-based case-control study on risk factors for venous thrombosis, in which many genetic and acquired factors have been investigated. Our aim was to investigate the effect of the quality of the oral anticoagulant therapy for the initial venous thrombosis and its relationship with recurrence of thrombosis. Quality of anticoagulation was defined as the time spent at various INR levels during treatment, and we focused on the effect of sustained intensities above a certain INR in preventing recurrences later on. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-six patients with a total follow-up of 2495 patient-years were studied. The mean duration of the initial anticoagulant therapy was 194.5 days (range 48-4671). During follow-up, 58 recurrences were diagnosed (cumulative recurrence rate of 21.8% over 9 years). The mean INR during initial therapy was 2.90, with 90.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 88.4-92.3%] of the time being spent above an INR of 2.0, and 39.1% (95% CI 35.5-42.7%) above an INR of 3.0. Patients who spent more time below the target range, or who had a shorter duration of anticoagulation, did not experience a higher risk of recurrence after the initial period of anticoagulation had passed. CONCLUSION: Provided that oral anticoagulant treatment is adequately managed, according to international guidelines, recurrent thrombosis cannot be ascribed to variation in the primary treatment. Further attempts to reduce the risk of recurrence should therefore be aimed at identifying other explanatory factors, and subsequently fine-tuning the target ranges.

Patient self-management of oral anticoagulant care vs. management by specialized anticoagulation clinics: positive effects on quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) implies frequent blood checks and dose changes to prevent thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications. This may interfere with patients' social and working circumstances in addition to the possible stress caused by the condition necessitating this treatment. We studied whether patient self-management could be a way to improve quality of life in these patients. METHODS: Within a multicenter randomized study performed by two Dutch anticoagulation clinics, designed to study the effect on treatment quality (time within target range) of different modalities of patient self-management, we looked at the effect of increased patient education (n = 28), self-monitoring of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) (n = 47) and full patient self-management (INR monitoring and dosing of the OAT) (n = 41) on the quality of life of the patients. This was done with the aid of a written questionnaire (32 questions, minimum score = 1, maximum score = 6) at baseline (n = 163), and after 26 weeks (n = 118). We compared the results after 26 weeks with those at baseline, as well as between groups. RESULTS: General treatment satisfaction was already high under routine care (5.11 on a scale of 1-6) and increased further through self-monitoring of the INR (+0.19) and full self-management (+0.32). Distress (-0.44), perceived daily hassles (-0.31) and strain on the social network (-0.21) were reduced through full self-management. Improved patient education was associated with increased distress (+0.33) and perceived daily hassles (+0.23). Comparison at 26 weeks between groups showed similar improvements on these outcomes for self-monitoring and self-management vs. routine care after education.

Comparison of the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy through patient self-management and management by specialized anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated that patient self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) can improve treatment quality. However, most of these studies were not conducted within a specialized anticoagulation care system. The objective of the present study was to determine whether patient self-management of OAT improves the quality of care delivered by anticoagulation clinics. METHODS: In this randomized study by 2 Dutch anticoagulation clinics 341 patients aged between 18 and 75 years and receiving long-term OAT were divided into 4 groups: an existing routine care group of patients untrained in self-management; a routine care group of trained patients; a group managed weekly at an anticoagulation clinic where international normalized ratios were measured by trained patients; and weekly patient self-management. A 2-step randomization procedure was followed: first, a Zelen-design randomization was performed to distribute patients (without informing them) to the existing care group or to receive training in self-management; second, trained patients were randomized to the 3 other study groups. RESULTS: Only 25.6% of invited patients agreed to participate in the training program. Patients who remained in the existing care group were within the international normalized ratio target range 63.5% of the time. The type of coumarin taken was a major predicting factor of OAT quality. In all study groups phenprocoumon outperformed acenocoumarol by 11.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6%-16.5%). Weekly management with phenprocoumon led to a 6.5% improvement (95% CI, 0.0%-13.1%) in time in the international normalized ratio target range when patients were managed at an anticoagulation clinic and to an 8.7% improvement (95% CI, 1.6%-15.9%) when patients were self-managed. Weekly management with acenocoumarol did not improve the quality of OAT. CONCLUSION: With selected patients, the quality of OAT obtained through patient self-management is at least as high as that delivered by specialized physicians at anticoagulation clinics. Weekly management of OAT with long-acting phenprocoumon has to be preferred at anticoagulation clinics or, where possible, through patient self-management.

Sustained intake of paracetamol (acetaminophen) during oral anticoagulant therapy with coumarins does not cause clinically important INR changes: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is routinely advised when non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are necessary during oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT) because it has no relevant effect on the primary hemostasis. However, in a recent case-control study a dose-related effect was observed of paracetamol intake on the International Normalized Ratio (INR) values making its use controversial during OAT. Our objectives were to determine the effect of paracetamol on the INR values during OAT independent of underlying illness. A double-blind randomized controlled trial in which 31 out-patients on coumarin oral anticoagulant therapy with phenprocoumon, aged 18-70 years, with a planned treatment duration of more than 12 weeks, and an INR target range of 2.5-3.5, were included. Patients were randomized for placebo (10 patients), paracetamol 1500 mg daily (11 patients) or paracetamol 3000 mg daily (10 patients) for 14 days during the stable phase of coumarin OAT and INR values at day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29 were measured. At day 8 a mean rise of 0.46 INR was seen in both paracetamol groups compared to placebo. At day 15 there was no difference between placebo and paracetamol 1500 mg daily, and a small mean rise of 0.22 INR in the paracetamol 3000 mg daily group. The sustained use of paracetamol (acetaminophen) during oral anticoagulant therapy in itself does not provoke clinically relevant INR changes. Any important INR rise will predominantly be the result of the illness necessitating the intake of this medication. A difference has to be made between those patients taking paracetamol (acetaminophen) for pain relief or as an antipyretic during infectious diseases.

Expression of T cell activation antigen CD134 (OX40) has no predictive value for the occurrence or response to therapy of acute graft-versus-host disease in partial T cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation.

CD134 (OX40) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor family which is expressed by activated T lymphocytes. CD134 expression on T cells was monitored during the first 35 days post-transplant in 14 patients, receiving either an HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplant (BMT), a matched unrelated transplant (MUD-BMT) or an autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplant (PBPCT). The sibling and unrelated grafts were partially depleted of T cells. CD134 expression on CD4+ T cells peaked between 7 and 14 days after BMT, with a mean peak value of 45% of CD4+ cells (range 26-70%) over all three patient groups. The observed pattern of CD4+ CD134+ expression, an increase during the first 2 weeks post-BMT followed by a gradual decline towards values of 15-40%, was similar in all groups. No difference in the kinetics of CD134 expression by CD4+ T cells was observed between the patients that did or did not develop graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), nor did the clinical effect of any treatment given for GVHD correlate with alterations in CD134 expression by CD4+ T cells. Absolute CD4+,CD134+ T cell numbers showed a more rapid increment after autologous PBPCT than after sibling or MUD transplants. We conclude that expression of CD134+ by CD4+ T lymphocytes cannot serve as a surrogate marker for allo-reactivity. CD134+ expression may reflect lymphocyte regeneration, rather than alloreactivity.