RESUMO
Importance: Safety net hospitals (SNH) provide many community services. The cost of providing these services is unknown. Objective: To determine what safety net criteria are associated with differences in hospital operating margin. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of US acute care hospitals from 2017 to 2019 included eligible hospitals identified from US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Cost Reports. Exposures: Five domains of SNH: undercompensated care measured using the Disproportionate Share Hospital index, uncompensated care, essential community services, neighborhood disadvantage, and sole community hospital and critical access hospital status. Each was categorized as a quintile or binary response. Covariates included hospital ownership, size, teaching status, census region, urbanicity, and wage index. Main Outcomes and Measures: Operating margin and its association with each safety net criterion was determined using linear regression adjusting for all safety net criteria and covariates. Results: A total of 4219 hospitals were analyzed, of which 3329 hospitals (78.9%) satisfied at least 1 safety net criterion; 23 hospitals (0.5%) met 4 or all 5 criteria. Among safety net criteria, the highest quintile of undercompensated care (-6.2 percentage point difference compared with lowest quintile; 95% CI, -8.2 to -4.2 percentage points), uncompensated care (-3.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.1 to -1.6 percentage points), and neighborhood disadvantage (-3.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.7 to -2.1 percentage points) were each associated with a lower operating margin. No association with operating margin was found between critical access or sole community hospital status (0.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.8 to 2.7 percentage points) or the highest vs lowest quintile of essential services (0.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.2 to 2.7 percentage points). Among essential services, burn, inpatient psychiatry, and primary care services were associated with lower operating margin, while others were either not associated or showed positive association. Fall-off in operating margin by level of uncompensated care was most severe in the highest percentiles of uncompensated care, with the most marked declines among those with the lowest operating margin. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of SNH, hospitals in the highest quintiles of undercompensated care, uncompensated care, and neighborhood disadvantage were more financially vulnerable than those not in the top quintile, especially when they met numerous of these criteria. Ensuring targeting of financial support to these hospitals could improve their financial stability.
Assuntos
Medicaid , Medicare , Idoso , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Economia Hospitalar , Estudos Transversais , Hospitais ComunitáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergency department visits for anaphylaxis have increased considerably over the past few decades, especially among children. Despite this, anaphylaxis management remains highly variable and contributes to significant health care spending. On the basis of emerging evidence, in this quality improvement project we aimed to safely decrease hospitalization rates, increase the use of cetirizine, and decrease use of corticosteroids for children with anaphylaxis by December 31, 2019. METHODS: A multipronged intervention strategy including a revised evidence-based guideline was implemented at a tertiary children's teaching hospital by using the Model for Improvement. Statistical process control was used to evaluate for changes in key measures. Length of stay and unplanned return visits within 72 hours were monitored as process and balancing measures, respectively. As a national comparison, hospitalization rates were compared with other hospitals' data from the Pediatric Health Information System. RESULTS: Hospitalizations decreased significantly from 28.5% to 11.2% from preimplementation to implementation, and the balancing measure of 72-hour revisits was stable. The proportion of patients receiving cetirizine increased significantly from 4.2% to 59.7% and use of corticosteroids decreased significantly from 72.6% to 32.4% in patients without asthma. The proportion of patients meeting length of stay criteria increased from 53.3% to 59.9%. Hospitalization rates decreased nationally over time. CONCLUSIONS: We reduced hospitalizations for anaphylaxis by 17.3% without concomitant increases in revisits, demonstrating that unnecessary hospitalizations can be safely avoided. The use of a local evidence-based guideline paired with close outcome monitoring and sustained messaging and feedback to clinicians can effectively improve anaphylaxis management.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia/terapia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Hospitalização , Hospitais Pediátricos/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Adolescente , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Boston/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/tendências , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Hospitais Pediátricos/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Melhoria de Qualidade/tendênciasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often have coexisting feeding disorders. We hope to emphasize the significant implications that these feeding disorders can have on this patient population through a unique case of hypokalemia-induced rhabdomyolysis. METHOD: We present a unique case of a 3-year-old boy with ASD and a longstanding history of food selectivity whose routine was disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and severe undernutrition, who presented with profound hypokalemia and was subsequently found to have elevated muscle enzymes consistent with rhabdomyolysis despite only subtle complaints of difficulty walking. RESULTS: The patient was treated with aggressive hydration, electrolyte therapy, and nasogastric tube feeds, which resulted in clinical and biochemical evidence of improvement. He was also reconnected to ASD-related care services that had lapsed during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: This case exemplifies the adverse impact that feeding disorders can have on patients with ASD, particularly in the setting of stressors such as a global pandemic, and is also the first documented pediatric case of rhabdomyolysis secondary to hypokalemia from severe undernutrition. It demonstrates that physicians should have a low threshold to assess for clinical and laboratory evidence of rhabdomyolysis in patients with profound hypokalemia because symptoms of hypokalemia-induced rhabdomyolysis can often be subtle, which can delay diagnosis and thereby increase the risk for life-threatening complications from extensive muscle damage.
Assuntos
Transtorno do Espectro Autista , Transtorno Autístico , COVID-19 , Hipopotassemia , Desnutrição , Rabdomiólise , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/complicações , COVID-19/complicações , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Hipopotassemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipopotassemia/complicações , Masculino , Desnutrição/complicações , Pandemias , Rabdomiólise/induzido quimicamente , Rabdomiólise/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the socioeconomic and racial and/or ethnic disparities impacting the diagnosis and outcomes of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective case-control study was conducted at 3 academic centers from January 1 to September 1, 2020. Children with MIS-C were compared with 5 control groups: children with coronavirus disease 2019, children evaluated for MIS-C who did not meet case patient criteria, children hospitalized with febrile illness, children with Kawasaki disease, and children in Massachusetts based on US census data. Neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and social vulnerability index (SVI) were measured via a census-based scoring system. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between SES, SVI, race and ethnicity, and MIS-C diagnosis and clinical severity as outcomes. RESULTS: Among 43 patients with MIS-C, 19 (44%) were Hispanic, 11 (26%) were Black, and 12 (28%) were white; 22 (51%) were in the lowest quartile SES, and 23 (53%) were in the highest quartile SVI. SES and SVI were similar between patients with MIS-C and coronavirus disease 2019. In multivariable analysis, lowest SES quartile (odds ratio 2.2 [95% confidence interval 1.1-4.4]), highest SVI quartile (odds ratio 2.8 [95% confidence interval 1.5-5.1]), and racial and/or ethnic minority background were associated with MIS-C diagnosis. Neither SES, SVI, race, nor ethnicity were associated with disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Lower SES or higher SVI, Hispanic ethnicity, and Black race independently increased risk for MIS-C. Additional studies are required to target interventions to improve health equity for children.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/etnologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Background: In 2011, the Colombian government started a nationwide program, Hábitos y Estilos de Vida Saludable (HEVS; Healthy Life Habits), providing free, community-based physical activity classes for individuals across Colombia. This study describes the HEVS program, participant characteristics, and changes in anthropomorphic and health measures following the program. Methods: In this observational study, demographic information, current health status, lifestyle habits, and anthropomorphic measures were collected from adult HEVS participants at baseline and after program completion 11 months later. Changes in anthropomorphic and health measurements after the HEVS program were compared in the same participants using a paired t test and McNemar test, respectively. Results: A total of 56,472 adult participants (86.5% female) enrolled in the HEVS program. The greatest proportion of participants was between the ages of 18 and 34 years. Prior to participating in HEVS, mean body mass index and waist circumference were 26.3 kg/m2 and 85.7 cm, respectively. Postprogram data from 17,145 individuals showed statistically significant decreases in body mass index, waist circumference, and the proportion of patients with self-reported hypertension. Conclusions: The HEVS program successfully engaged a large number of Colombians in physical activity and resulted in significant improvements in their health, demonstrating the effectiveness of a government-supported, community-based physical activity program.
Assuntos
Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Nível de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Colômbia , Feminino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autorrelato , Circunferência da Cintura/fisiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions are tied to financial penalties and thus significantly influence health-care policy. Many current studies on readmissions lack national representation by not tracking readmissions across hospitals. The recently released Nationwide Readmission Database is one of the most comprehensive national sources of readmission data available, making it an invaluable resource to understand this critically important health policy issue. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database for 2013 and 2014 was queried for adult patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (441.4) undergoing endovascular (39.71) or open (38.44) repair. Outcomes examined were overall/initial admission mortality and overall/30-day readmissions. Multivariate logistic regression for these outcomes was also performed on multiple readmission factors. RESULTS: Fifty-three thousand four hundred seventeen patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (47,431 endovascular aortic repair [EVAR] versus 5,986 open surgical repair [OSR]). Significant differences were found for EVAR versus OSR on overall readmissions, initial admission cost, readmission costs, length of stay, days to readmission, and overall/initial admission mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that length of stay > 30, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 1, discharge disposition, and female sex were all significant predictors of 30-day readmission. Repair type was significantly associated with 30-day readmissions; however, it was not a significant factor for overall readmissions. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in costs, prognosis, and readmission rates for EVAR versus OSR. Given that these differences are being used to create "acceptable" readmission rates, disbursement quotas among hospitals, and subsequent penalties for providers outside the expected rates, it is only prudent to obtain the most accurate information to guide those policies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management/epidemiological, level IV.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Readmissão do Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/economia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/economia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions are associated not only with increased mortality, morbidity, and costs but also, with current health-care reform, tied to significant financial and administrative penalties. Some studies show that patients undergoing vascular surgery may have higher than average readmission rates. The recently released Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) is the most comprehensive national source of readmission data, gathering discharge information from 22 geographically dispersed states, accounting for 51.2% of the total U.S. resident population and 49.3% of all U.S. hospitalizations. The aim of this study is to use the power of the NRD and obtain nationally representative readmission information for patients admitted with claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI) who underwent revascularization procedures. METHODS: The NRD was queried for all patients admitted for claudication (International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision [ICD-9] 440.21) or CLI (ICD-9 440.22-440.24) and who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, peripheral bypass, or aortofemoral bypass. Patient demographics, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), mortality, readmission rates, and associated costs were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was implemented on claudication and CLI groups on all outcomes of interest. The most common readmission diagnosis codes and diagnosis groups were also identified. RESULTS: A total of 92,769 patients were admitted for peripheral vascular disease (33,055 with claudication and 59,714 with CLI). The 30-day readmission/any readmission rate was 8.97%/21.49% and 19.26%/40.36%, for claudication and CLI, respectively. Significant differences were found for claudication and CLI, respectively, on initial cost of admission ($18,548 vs. $29,148, P < 0.001), readmission costs ($14,726 vs. $17,681 P < 0.001), LOS (4 days vs. 9 days, P < 0.001), days to readmission (73 days vs. 59 days, P < 0.001), mortality during initial admission (256 vs. 1,363, P < 0.001), and mortality during any admission (538 vs. 3,838, P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis found that claudication, CLI, angioplasty, peripheral bypass, aortofemoral bypass, female sex, age >65, Charlson Comorbidity Index, LOS, and primary expected payer status were all significant predictors of 30-day and overall readmissions at varying degrees. The 5 most common disease readmission groups found were other vascular procedures (12.6%), amputation of lower limb except toes (6.3%), sepsis (5.4%), heart failure (4.9%) and postoperative or other device infections (4.8%). Of the abovementioned groups, the 4 most common diagnoses included "other postoperative infections," sepsis, atherosclerosis of native arteries with gangrene, and "other complications due to other vascular device, implant, or graft." CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that there is a significant difference in readmission rates, cost, and morbidity between patients admitted for claudication and CLI. Furthermore, based on regression analysis, there are multiple other clear risk factors associated with worse clinical and economic outcomes. Further study is needed to predict which patients will require increased vigilance during their hospital stay to prevent readmissions and worse outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management/epidemiological, level IV.