Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Dis Child ; 95(11): 915-7, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20573742

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify issues raised by research ethics committees (RECs) in letters about applications to conduct research involving children. METHODS: Analysis of 80 provisional and unfavourable opinion decision letters written by RECs in response to applications to conduct research involving child participants. RESULTS: RECs were most likely to be concerned about issues relating to consent, recruitment, care and protection of participants, scientific design and confidentiality. RECs focused on children's status as "vulnerable". They sought to ensure that children would be protected, that appropriate written language would be used to communicate with children and that an appropriate person would give consent for children to participate. IMPLICATIONS: Researchers should be attentive to issues of potential vulnerability when preparing applications. REC letters may be improved by giving clear and explicit reasons for their opinions.


Assuntos
Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Ética em Pesquisa , Pediatria/ética , Adolescente , Criança , Proteção da Criança/ética , Pré-Escolar , Confidencialidade/ética , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/ética , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA