Modified intra-cerebral challenge assay for acellular pertussis vaccines: comparisons among whole cell and acellular vaccines.

The modified intra-cerebral challenge assay for acellular pertussis vaccines is used in Japan, Korea, China and possibly other Asian countries as the potency assay for routine release of acellular pertussis (aP) and combination vaccines. National reference standards, typically of whole cell pertussis (Pw) vaccine, are in use in these countries, but there is no agreed international reference standard for acellular pertussis vaccines. We report here the results of a collaborative study initiated in September 2006 in which fourteen laboratories performing the modified intra-cerebral challenge assay took part. These laboratories compared their various national references of Pw vaccine, the third International Standard for whole cell pertussis vaccine, a previously studied two-component freeze-dried aP vaccine preparation coded JNIH-3, and four different aP vaccines in combination with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. The results of this study show that the modified intra-cerebral challenge assay works reliably although there are inter-laboratory variations in potency estimates. Pw and aP vaccines show apparent differences in dose-response lines in some assay systems. This indicates dissimilarity in performance in at least some of these assay systems. Estimates of relative potency for aP vaccines in terms of the Pw vaccine national or in-house reference preparations differ significantly from one another. Different mouse strains were used in each country and the different strains may also differ in their responsiveness to Pw and aP vaccines. Estimates for different types of aP vaccine formulations show less inter-laboratory variation in terms of JNIH-3 than in terms of the third IS for Pw vaccine and the remaining variation is not apparently related to the different mouse strains. This study thus suggests that an aP vaccine standard would improve inter-laboratory agreement. These data do not show significant dissimilarity in dose-response lines between JNIH-3 and the various vaccine products included, irrespective of the differences in aP components. Available data indicate that JNIH-3 is sufficiently stable to serve as an International Standard. On the basis of these results and with the agreement of the participants, it was proposed that JNIH-3 should be established as an International Standard for acellular pertussis vaccine for use in the modified intra-cerebral challenge assay and other protective bioassays, with an assigned activity of 34 International Units (IU) per ampoule. A WHO Working Group on Standardization of Acellular Pertussis Vaccines: potency assay met in Beijing, China, 7-9 November 2007. This group considered the report of this study, the comments of the participants and implications of the use of JNIH-3 as a reference standard and recommended establishment of JNIH-3 as an International Standard. The results of this study and the report of the Working Group were submitted to the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) of WHO which established JNIH-3 as the first International Standard for acellular pertussis vaccine in the modified intra-cerebral challenge assay and other protective bioassays with an assignment of 34IU per ampoule in October 2008.

Implications of experimental technique for analysis and interpretation of data from animal experiments: outliers and increased variability resulting from failure of intraperitoneal injection procedures.

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections are widely used in laboratory animal experiments. This technique has a failure rate that is typically reported to be of the order of 10-20%. It is not apparent that failures of i.p. injection and their consequences for the experimental results are as widely recognized as the use of the technique. We illustrate the consequences of i.p. injection failure for the analysis and interpretation of several bioassays. We suggest approaches to data analysis that should be considered, and emphasize the need to recognize and allow for the possibility of i.p. injection failure in the analysis and interpretation of laboratory animal experiments involving this technique.

Biological activity of EDQM CRS for Interferon alfa-2a and Interferon alfa-2b - assessment in two in vitro bioassays.

The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM) supplies Chemical Reference Substances (CRS) for Interferon (IFN) alfa-2a (CRS I0320300) and for IFN alfa-2b (CRS I0320301) for specified physicochemical tests. However, no information is provided as to their biological activity. In contrast, the World Health Organization (WHO) provides the 2nd International Standards (IS) for IFN alfa-2a (code 95/650) and for IFN alfa-2b (code 95/566), with activity defined in International Units (IU) for calibration of biological activity of preparations of IFN. We have compared the EDQM CRSs with the WHO ISs in two bioassay systems, one measuring the anti-proliferative activity in the Daudi cell line and the other measuring a reporter gene activation in an A549 cell line. In each of these assay systems, the CRSs gave dose - response relations, which were similar to those for the WHO ISs. Estimates of relative activity for each CRS, in terms of the respective IS, showed specific biological activity for the CRSs of the same order as the nominal specific activity for the ISs. However, the estimates of relative activity were not consistent between the two assays systems, emphasizing the need for calibration within each system, if the CRS were to be used as a working standard for bioassays. For structure-activity studies, both physicochemical and biological activity characterisation are required for the same biopharmaceutical preparation. CRS I0320300 and CRS I0320301 may prove useful as working standards for some bioassay systems.

Detection, measurement and characterization of unwanted antibodies induced by therapeutic biologicals.

Assessment of the unwanted immunogenicity of therapeutic biologicals in recipients is an important consideration in the evaluation of these medicinal products. Proper planning of immunogenicity studies with appropriately devised strategies is critical if valid and meaningful conclusions concerning the unwanted immunogenicity are to be derived. An essential requisite for such studies is the need for conducting carefully selected and validated procedures. Several techniques are available for detection, characterization and measurement of antibodies elicited in an immune response. These include various formats of immunoassays, surface plasmon resonance and biological assays. None of these assays alone can provide sufficient information on the characteristics of the induced antibodies. A combination of methods is therefore usually necessary for a detailed understanding of the quantity and type(s) of antibodies generated against a therapeutic product. This manuscript considers the benefits and limitations of the various techniques available for antibody detection and outlines a brief strategy for the assessment of unwanted immunogenicity of therapeutic products.

Kinetics of development and characteristics of antibodies induced in cancer patients against yeast expressed rDNA derived granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF).

We have determined the presence and kinetics of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) antibodies induced after repeated administration of a yeast expressed GM-CSF product in prostate cancer patients with minimal recurrent disease using a panel of assays for detection and characterization of antibodies. Results showed that all 15 prostate cancer patients treated with GM-CSF developed GM-CSF reactive antibodies during the course of therapy. Most patients (87%) developed GM-CSF reactive antibodies within 3 months while in other patients (13%), these antibodies were induced after additional cycles of GM-CSF treatment. For most patients, the timing of occurrence of these antibodies was the same regardless of whether the ELISA or surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assays were used for detection. However, in two patients, the recognition of GM-CSF reactive antibodies by SPR assays preceded their detection by ELISA. A significant number of patients (n=9, 60%) developed GM-CSF antibodies which neutralized the biological activity of GM-CSF in vitro in a cell-line based bioassay. These antibodies also recognized GM-CSF protein from different expression systems including the non-glycosylated protein from E. coli indicating that the antibody response is directed towards the amino acid backbone of the protein. A significant effect of GM-CSF antibodies on PSA modulation was not observed in this small cohort of patients despite an alteration in PSA levels in some treated patients. The study design used here did not allow conclusions regarding the relationship between neutralizing antibodies and the PSA levels which were used as a marker for clinical outcome. Implementation of a clinical strategy which permits monitoring for antibody development and for levels of a relevant pre-determined clinical marker at appropriate time-points is necessary for assessing the impact of antibody development on the therapeutic efficacy of the protein.

Strategies for detection, measurement and characterization of unwanted antibodies induced by therapeutic biologicals.

An important aspect of evaluating the safety of therapeutic biologicals is the assessment of the unwanted immunogenicity of such biologicals in recipients. Properly planned immunogenicity studies with appropriately devised strategies are critical if valid conclusions concerning the unwanted immunogenicity are to be derived. Such studies need to be conducted using carefully selected and validated procedures. Several techniques are available for detection and measurement of immunogenicity including immunoassays, radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPAs), surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and bioassays. A combination of methods for characterization of the induced antibodies is usually necessary for a detailed understanding of the type(s) of antibodies generated against a therapeutic product. This review considers the benefits and limitations of the various techniques available for antibody detection and outlines a strategy for the assessment of unwanted immunogenicity of therapeutic products.

Standardization of antibody preparations for use in immunogenicity studies: a case study using the World Health Organization International Collaborative Study for Islet Cell Antibodies.

The immunogenicity of biological therapeutic products is currently a high profile regulatory and biotechnology industry issue. The immune responses raised against biotechnology products range from the benign, to affecting product efficacy, to those that have serious deleterious clinical impact. The most widely used marker of immunogenicity is the detection and measurement of antibody responses induced in vivo to a product. This relies on assays that are sensitive and robust. In order to assess the parameters of an assay during its design, development and validation, it is extremely useful to have a reference standard to compare assay results. However, immune responses lead to polyclonal antibody preparations that can vary by affinity and avidity. This makes it extremely difficult to select a preparation that will behave similarly in different test systems and against different antibody samples. The case example of the WHO standardization of islet cell antibodies illustrates the difficulties in the process and the mechanisms required to produce a suitable antibody standard.

Cytokine levels as performance indicators for white blood cell reduction of platelet concentrates.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With the implementation of universal white blood cell (WBC) reduction in the UK, in-process WBC-reduction filters for pooled buffy coat (BC)-derived platelet concentrates (PCs) and apheresis methods are used routinely for the production of WBC-reduced PCs. While these strategies meet the specification for WBC reduction (< 5 x 10(6) WBCs/unit), the products from these processes may differ depending on the process employed and its performance. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate whether PCs prepared using various WBC-reduction processes are sufficiently depleted of WBCs to limit cytokine accumulation during storage and to assess if cytokine levels detected in platelet products can serve as indicators of acceptable platelet activation as a result of the WBC-reduction process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured the levels of cytokines predominantly derived from WBCs [e.g. interleukin-8 (IL-8)] and platelets [e.g. regulated on activation, normal, T-cell expressed, and secreted (RANTES) and transforming growth factor-beta(1) (TGF-beta(1))] under the present experimental conditions in different WBC-reduced PCs, i.e. PCs prepared from three different WBC-reduction filters and control non-filtered PCs using pooled BCs from the same donors and three apheresis types. Supernatant plasma was collected at the beginning (day 1) and end (day 5) of the shelf life of each PC, and the cytokine content was determined using appropriate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Process efficiency was assessed by platelet yield and residual WBC count. RESULTS: We found that products from the apheresis process involving a filtration step (Haemonetics MCS+) showed a lower cytokine content on both day 1 and day 5 in comparison with the fluidized bed (COBE Spectra) or elutriation (Amicus) processes. WBC reduction of BC-PCs of the same origin using three different filters showed comparable levels of cytokines on day 1 in all units. After storage for 5 days, the levels of IL-8 remained essentially unchanged in filtered BC-PCs but increased by more than threefold in control non-filtered BC-PCs, suggesting IL-8 release by residual WBCs present in the control PCs. The concentration of platelet-derived cytokines such as RANTES and TGF-beta(1), however, increased significantly in all filtered and control non-filtered PCs during the storage period. CONCLUSION: These results show that markers of cytokine release from both WBCs and platelets are useful indicators of the performance and efficacy of the WBC-reduction process and of platelet quality.

Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of parallel line assays.

Underlying the design of any assay and further, interpretation of the results, are multitudes of assumptions and implications, ranging from 'biological' assumptions about the nature of the assay system and its response to the materials assayed to 'statistical' assumptions about the form of the dose-response relationship and the distribution of the response data. As far as possible, assays should be designed and analysis carried out to assess these assumptions. Implications for the individual assay are discussed, since this is where all studies of assays necessarily begin. Consideration is then extended to implications for the combination of data and results of several assays.

Calibration of replacement international standard and European pharmacopoeia biological reference preparation for tetanus toxoid, adsorbed.

Here we report the characterisation of a preparation of tetanus toxoid, adsorbed, and its calibration by 27 laboratories in 19 countries in a joint international collaborative study co-sponsored by World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee of Biological Standardization (ECBS) and the European Biological Standardisation Programme of European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM), Council of Europe. Calibration was in terms of the Second International Standard (I.S.) for Tetanus Toxoid, Adsorbed, by the established WHO/European Pharmacopoeia (Ph Eur) challenge methods. The replacement standard preparation was found to have a unitage of 469 IU/ampoule on the basis of its calibration in guinea-pigs and 496 IU/ampoule on the basis of its calibration in mice. Assessment, both within the collaborative study and as part of candidate characterisation, indicated satisfactory stability of the candidate preparation. This study also provided some information on the effect of mouse strain on potency testing of tetanus vaccines. A limited assessment of the impact of the replacement standard on testing of current production batches of vaccines was also carried out by four manufacturers. This study did not directly address the serological approaches to potency testing. However, one laboratory offered data from mouse serology assay, which gave comparable estimates to in vivo mouse bioassay. Based on the results of this study and with the agreement of participants, the candidate standard was established as the Third International Standard for Tetanus Toxoid, Adsorbed (coded 98/552) by the WHO Expert Committee of Biological Standardization (ECBS) in November 2000. The same preparation was also established as the second Ph Eur Biological Reference Preparation (Ph Eur BRP, batch no. 2) by the Steering Committee of the Biological Standardisation Programme of the EDQM and approved by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission.

An ECVAM pre-validation study of physicochemical methods for predicting the biological potency of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone.

A pre-validation study was carried out, by six laboratories from six countries, of two physicochemical methods for predicting the in vivo biological potency of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (follitropin beta), based on quantitative measures of isoform distribution by isoelectric focusing (IEF) and by capillary zone electrophoresis. Each of these methods was used to estimate the predicted bioactivities of four preparations of follitropin beta differing widely in their isoform compositions and specific bioactivities. The results of this study indicate that these methods, and particularly IEF, are transferable between laboratories, and produce results which are sufficiently accurate, precise, and reproducible, for them to be used for predicting the bioactivity of follitropin beta, especially if used with a standard preparation. The performance of these two methods for predicting the bioactivity of other types of follicle stimulating hormone, such as follitropin alfa, would need to be assessed separately, and might involve quantitatively different relationships between the responses measured in the physicochemical method and the bioactivities of preparations estimated by bioassay.

Collaborative study for the establishment of tetanus vaccine (adsorbed) Third International Standard and European Pharmacopoeia Biological Reference Preparation batch no. 2.

The aim of the present collaborative study was to calibrate two candidate replacement standards for tetanus vaccine for human use in the terms of the Second International Standard (IS) for Tetanus Toxoid, Adsorbed (TEXA-2) using challenge potency assays in guinea pigs and mice and to establish the 3rd IS and the Ph. Eur. BRP batch 2. Two test preparations (coded B and C) were included as candidate replacement for TEXA-2 and Ph. Eur. BRP batch 1 (EBRP-1). This project was run as a joint WHO/Ph. Eur. study. Twenty-seven laboratories representing nineteen countries participated in the study. Twenty-three laboratories performed assays in mice (11 laboratories performed lethal, 11 paralysis, and one serology assays) and fourteen laboratories performed assays in guinea pigs (10 laboratories performed lethal and 4 paralysis assays). Estimates of potency, expressed in ampoule of TEXA-2 per ampoule of candidate replacement standards were two-fold higher in mice than in guinea pigs. However, using the assumed relationship between TEXA-1 and TEXA-2 in mice and guinea pigs (Lyng and Nyerges, 1984), potency estimates for candidate replacement standards (sample coded B and C), in terms of TEXA-1, gives estimates which are similar in both animal models. Stability was assessed within the collaborative study for candidate standard B. On the basis of this collaborative study, the ECBS of WHO has established the candidate material coded B as the Third IS for Tetanus Toxoid, Adsorbed, with an assigned unitage of 469 IU/ampoule, based on its calibration by guinea pig challenge assays (WHO report BS/00.1932). Further studies were organised to assess which of the two candidate standards is most suitable as replacement for EBRP-1. Manufacturers were asked to include candidate B and candidate C in their routine quality control potency assays of tetanus vaccines in order to assess the impact of the use of either preparation on their calibration results. The features and results of this additional phase are described at the end of this report in a separate section entitled "Choice of replacement batch for EBRP-1". Based on these results, at the session in March 2001, the Ph. Eur. Commission adopted candidate B as the Tetanus vaccine (adsorbed) Ph. Eur. BRP Batch 2 with assigned potencies of 469 IU/ampoule for the guinea pig assays and 496 IU/ampoule for the mouse assays.

Establishment of new and replacement World Health Organization International Biological Standards for human interferon alpha and omega.

The complexity of the human interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) family, with its multiple molecular forms and various biological activities, raises a number of scientific issues with regard to the biological standardisation of natural and recombinant IFN-alpha products. To address such issues and to achieve an appropriate biological standardisation of human interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) preparations, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) of the United Kingdom (UK), in association with the Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) of the United States of America (USA), organised an international collaborative study, which was subsequently divided into two parts. Ninety-three participating laboratories from 29 countries worldwide participated in the first part of the study. They performed titrations on up to 15 different IFN-alpha preparations and one IFN-omega (omega) preparation in a variety of assays, including those based upon antiviral, antiproliferative, and other biological activities of IFN, and contributed raw data from these assays to NIBSC for analysis and calculation of relative activities. Analysis of data from this part of the study showed a greater than expected assay-dependent disparity between the relative activities of different IFN-alpha preparations. This disparity was found when only antiviral assays were considered and even when there were only small molecular dissimilarities between two otherwise closely related IFN-alpha preparations. The lack of assay independence and relative activity equivalence has indicated that a single biological potency standard for all IFN-alpha subtypes and mixtures would be inappropriate. Hence, individual, homologous standards, each with a separate unitage, were required for biological standardisation and potency determinations of individual IFN-alpha subtypes. At this stage, potency assignments to the IFN-alpha and -omega preparations included in the study were made as far as possible on the basis of comparison of antiviral activity with that of the 1st International Reference Preparation (IRP) for IFN, human leukocyte, 69/19. However, it was recognised that other standards had been used in assays to estimate potencies of widely available, current, therapeutic IFN-alpha products. Thus, to ensure the continuity of unitages already in use for IFN-alpha products, the second part of the study, which involved 12 members of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (IFPMA), was carried out using for calibration of antiviral assays those IFN-alpha preparations that most closely matched manufacturers' products or that had been previously used for assay calibration by a manufacturer for a particular product. On the basis of data analysis from the second part of the study, potency assignments to the IFN-alpha preparations, as made in the first part of the study, were either left unchanged or changed to potency assignments that ensured as far as possible continuity with existing unitages. From among the IFN preparations evaluated, the following were recommended as the most suitable to continue or replace existing WHO international standards (IS) and have subsequently been formally established as WHO IS at the 51st meeting (October 1999) of the WHO ECBS: 83/514, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha1 8000 international units (IU); 95/650, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha2a, 63,000 IU; 95/566, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha2b, 70,000 IU; 95/580, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha2c, 40,000 IU; 95/572, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha1/8, 27,000 IU; 94/786, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alphaCon1, 100,000 IU; 94/784, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha (leukocyte), 11,000 IU; 95/574, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha (leukocyte n3), 60,000 IU; 95/568, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha (lymphoblastoid n1), 38,000 IU; 94/754, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-omega, 20,000 IU. These WHO IS are available upon request to NIBSC.

Calibration of replacement international standard and European Pharmacopoeia Biological Reference Preparation for Diphtheria Toxoid, Adsorbed.

We report here the characterisation of a preparation of diphtheria toxoid, adsorbed, and its calibration by twenty laboratories in fourteen countries in terms of the Second International Standard (I.S.) for Diphtheria Toxoid, Adsorbed, coded sample A (DIXA) using the established World Health Organisation (WHO)/European Pharmacopoeia (Ph Eur) challenge methods. The replacement standard preparation was found to have a unitage of 160 IU/ampoule on the basis of its calibration by in vivo bioassay. Stability was assessed within the collaborative study, and as part of candidate characterisation. Results suggest that the replacement standard will have satisfactory stability. This study also provided an opportunity to investigate serology as alternative to in vivo bioassay for potency testing of diphtheria vaccines. Six laboratories participated by performing serology according to in-house protocol. The calibration of the replacement standard in a mouse Vero cell assay gave a significantly higher results than in the established WHO/Ph Eur methods. Based on the results of this study and with the agreement of participants, the candidate standard was established as the Third International Standard for Diphtheria Toxoid, Adsorbed (coded 98/560) by the WHO Expert Committee of Biological Standardization in October 1999. The same preparation was also established as the second Ph Eur Biological Reference Preparation (Ph Eur BRP, batch no. 3) by the Steering Committee of the Biological Standardisation Programme of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and approved by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission.

Third International Standard for pertussis vaccine: international confirmation study of activity of British Standard for pertussis vaccine, coded 66/303.

The first British Standard (BS) (Code 66/303) for pertussis whole cell vaccine was prepared from the same suspension of Bordetella pertussis as the now exhausted Second International Standard for Pertussis Vaccine (2ndIS). The BS and the 2ndIS were compared and calibrated in a previous international study. This report describes a small international study, which included the BS, the 1stIS and the 2ndIS so that the present relationship of these preparations to one another could be assessed. The results of this study show that the relationship of the BS to the 1stIS is consistent with its established unitage of 46 IU per ampoule. The results further show that the potency of the BS is broadly consistent with that of the 2ndIS and that the BS has not lost activity relative to the 2ndIS (from which it was previously found to be indistinguishable). Based on its original calibration and supported by the results of this present study, the BS has been established as the Third International Standard for Pertussis Vaccine, with an assigned unitage of 46 IU per ampoule.

International collaborative study: evaluation of proposed International Reference Reagent of pertussis antiserum (mouse) 97/642.

A freeze dried preparation of mouse serum in vials coded 97/642 containing antibodies to five pertussis antigens [pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (PRN), fimbriae type 2 and 3 (Fim 2 and 3)] has been assessed for its suitability as an international reference reagent in an international collaborative study by thirteen laboratories in nine countries. This serum has been compared with U.S. Standard Pertussis Antiserum (mouse) Lot No. 1 (US Lot 1), which has been in use since 1995, for antibodies for each antigen. Calibration of the proposed International Reference Reagent of Pertussis Antiserum (pIRR) in terms of US Lot 1 gives results which are broadly consistent between laboratories for antibodies to each antigen, although the between-laboratory differences are larger than those seen for comparison of identical sera. Calibration of two positive control sera in terms of the pIRR gave similar between laboratory variability of estimates to that obtained when the same sera were calibrated in terms of US Lot 1. Overall continuity of estimates is maintained if units are assigned to the pIRR based on its calibration in terms of US Lot 1 in this study. Data presently available indicate that the pIRR is sufficiently stable to serve as a reference reagent. It was therefore recommended, with the agreement of all participants, that the preparation in vials coded 97/642 be established as the First International Reference Reagent for Pertussis Antiserum, mouse, with assigned unitages 16 units of anti-PT per vial, 143 units of anti-FHA per vial and 30 units of anti-PRN per vial based on its calibration in terms of US Lot 1. These unitages are also consistent with calibration of 97/642 in terms of the Japanese preparations JNIH-11 for anti-FHA and of JNIH-12 for anti-PT. Purified antigens for Fim 2 and Fim 3 are not readily available and an arbitrary value of 32 units per vial is suggested for anti-Fim 2 and 3 mixture. These recommendations were agreed by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization of the World Health Organization.

International Standards for hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor: initial assessment of candidate materials and their evaluation by multicentre collaborative study.

Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) is a potent paracrine growth factor with motogenic, mitogenic and morphogenic activities, and a potential therapeutic role in hepatic and renal disease, as well as diagnostic and prognostic applications. It is synthesised as an inactive, single-chain precursor that is cleaved by serine proteases to give a biologically active, heterodimeric form. To develop World Health Organization (WHO) International Standards (IS) for HGF/SF, candidate preparations of the two forms were assessed in a multicentre study in which they were compared with local standards by bioassay and immunoassay. Among laboratories, there was a wide variation in the estimates of potencies of the candidate standards in terms of in-house reference preparations, but between-assay and within-assay variabilities were low within laboratories. In some assay systems, the precursor and heterodimer showed different responses. Since both molecular forms are widely used in current assay systems, this suggested that a reference preparation was required for each form of the HGF/SF molecule. Accordingly, the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization of WHO established the heterodimeric material (96/564) as the first IS for HGF/SF, human, recombinant, with an assigned unitage of 4000 IU/ampoule and, for the purpose of immunoassay calibration, a nominal HGF/SF content of 4 microg/ampoule. The precursor preparation (96/556) was established as the first IS for HGF/SF (precursor) with an assigned unitage of 2000 IU/ampoule and, for the purpose of immunoassay calibration, a nominal HGF/SF (precursor) content of 4 microg/ampoule. The preparations can be obtained upon written request to the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC, PO Box 1193), by e-mail (standards@nibsc.ac.uk) or ordered at http://www.nibsc.ac.uk.

The fourth International Standard for Human Urinary FSH and LH: specificities of LH seminal vesicle weight gain assays in the collaborative study differ between laboratories.

The fourth International Standard for Human Urinary FSH and LH (IS; in ampoules coded 98/704) was compared with the third International Standard for Urinary FSH and LH (IS 71/264) by 10 laboratories in nine countries, using FSH and LH in vivo bioassays. Estimates of the FSH content of the IS by augmented ovarian weight gain assays were homogeneous within each laboratory and over all laboratories. The combined weighted geometric mean estimate of FSH content of the IS (with 95% fiducial limits) in terms of IS 71/264 was 71.9 (69.0-74.9) IU/ampoule. Although estimates by seminal vesicle weight gain (SVW) assays of the relative LH activities of the IS and IS 71/264 were homogeneous within laboratories, estimates were heterogeneous between laboratories. This indicated differences between the spectrum of LH isoforms in the IS and IS 71/264, which were obtained from different manufacturers, and differences between the specificities of SVW assays performed in different laboratories. The differences between the specificities of SVW assays appeared to be related to interactions among mean laboratory seminal vesicle weights, age and genetic strain of rat. The finding of inter-laboratory differences in the specificities of SVW assays is of some significance, as this assay method has been generally adopted by Pharmacopoeias for the control of the LH content of therapeutic products. The combined unweighted geometric mean estimate of LH content of the IS (with 95% fiducial limits) in terms of IS 71/264 by SVW and ovarian ascorbate depletion assays was 70.2 (61.7-80.0) IU/ampoule. Estimates of the FSH and LH content of ampoules of the IS kept at increased temperatures suggested that the IS would be adequately stable under normal storage conditions. On the basis of these results, the World Health Organization Expert Committee on Biological Standardization established the preparation in ampoules coded 98/704 as the fourth International Standard for Human Urinary FSH and LH, and assigned to the contents of each ampoule an activity of 72 International Units of urinary FSH and an activity of 70 International Units of urinary LH.

Multicentre collaborative study to calibrate IGF-II by bioassay and immunoassay: establishment of the First WHO Reference Reagent.

A preparation of recombinant insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) (NIBSC code 96/538) was compared with local standards in bioassays and immunoassays by eight laboratories in four countries to assess its suitability for use as a World Health Organisation (WHO) reference reagent. Estimates of relative potencies for the bioassays gave a geometric mean of 1.04 (0.94--1.16) microg of local standard per microg of 96/538. Estimates of relative immunological activities by immunoassay gave a geometric mean of 1.15 (0.94--1.38) microg of local standard per microg of 96/538. The study provided evidence that a common standard for rhIGF-II would be helpful and that 96/538 was sufficiently stable to serve as a reference reagent. Accordingly 96/538 was established as the First WHO Reference Reagent for IGF-II, human, recombinant, and assigned a unitage of 5000 units per ampoule and on the basis of the immunoassay results a nominal mass content of 5 microg per ampoule.

The first international standard for human leptin and the first international standard for mouse leptin: comparison of candidate preparations by in vitro bioassays and immunoassays.

In an international collaborative study, two preparations of human sequence recombinant leptin and two preparations of mouse sequence recombinant leptin were evaluated, using in vitro bioassays and immunoassays, by eight laboratories, in three countries, for their suitability to serve as the international standard (IS) for human and mouse leptin respectively. The bioassays detected the human and mouse leptin with similar potency, while the immunoassays showed a greater response to the leptin of the species against which the antibody preparation had been raised. Comparison of the candidate standards with the various preparations of leptin of the same species currently assayed in the participating laboratories showed that immunoassay measurements cannot be used to predict the biological potency. On the basis of the results reported here, in October 1999 the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization of the World Health Organization established the preparation coded 97/594 as the first IS for human leptin, with an assigned unitage of 4000 IU/ampoule, and the preparation coded 97/626 as the first IS for mouse leptin, with an assigned unitage of 4000 IU/ampoule. The ISs for leptin are distributed by the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, UK, http://www.nibsc.ac.uk.