Prediction and Detection of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression Using Deep Learning on Macular Optical Coherence Tomography.

PRCIS: A deep learning model trained on macular OCT imaging studies detected clinically significant functional glaucoma progression and was also able to predict future progression. OBJECTIVE: To use macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging to predict the future and detect concurrent visual field progression, respectively, using deep learning. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: A pretraining data set was comprised of 7,702,201 B-scan images from 151,389 macular OCT studies. The progression detection task included 3902 macular OCT imaging studies from 1534 eyes of 828 patients with glaucoma, and the progression prediction task included 1346 macular OCT studies from 1205 eyes of 784. METHODS: A novel deep learning method was developed to detect glaucoma progression and predict future progression using macular OCT, based on self-supervised pretraining of a vision transformer (ViT) model on a large, unlabeled data set of OCT images. Glaucoma progression was defined as a mean deviation (MD) rate of change of ≤ -0.5 dB/year over 5 consecutive Humphrey visual field tests, and rapid progression was defined as MD change ≤ -1 dB/year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic performance of the ViT model for prediction of future visual field progression and detection of concurrent visual field progression using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: The model distinguished stable eyes from progressing eyes, achieving an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.91). Rapid progression was detected with an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.91-0.93). The model also demonstrated high predictive ability for forecasting future glaucoma progression, with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.83-0.87). Rapid progression was predicted with an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: A deep learning model detected clinically significant functional glaucoma progression using macular OCT imaging studies and was also able to predict future progression. Early identification of patients undergoing glaucoma progression or at high risk for future progression may aid in clinical decision-making.

Evaluation and Mitigation of Racial Bias in Clinical Machine Learning Models: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Racial bias is a key concern regarding the development, validation, and implementation of machine learning (ML) models in clinical settings. Despite the potential of bias to propagate health disparities, racial bias in clinical ML has yet to be thoroughly examined and best practices for bias mitigation remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to perform a scoping review to characterize the methods by which the racial bias of ML has been assessed and describe strategies that may be used to enhance algorithmic fairness in clinical ML. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews. A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases, as well as Google Scholar, identified 635 records, of which 12 studies were included. RESULTS: Applications of ML were varied and involved diagnosis, outcome prediction, and clinical score prediction performed on data sets including images, diagnostic studies, clinical text, and clinical variables. Of the 12 studies, 1 (8%) described a model in routine clinical use, 2 (17%) examined prospectively validated clinical models, and the remaining 9 (75%) described internally validated models. In addition, 8 (67%) studies concluded that racial bias was present, 2 (17%) concluded that it was not, and 2 (17%) assessed the implementation of bias mitigation strategies without comparison to a baseline model. Fairness metrics used to assess algorithmic racial bias were inconsistent. The most commonly observed metrics were equal opportunity difference (5/12, 42%), accuracy (4/12, 25%), and disparate impact (2/12, 17%). All 8 (67%) studies that implemented methods for mitigation of racial bias successfully increased fairness, as measured by the authors' chosen metrics. Preprocessing methods of bias mitigation were most commonly used across all studies that implemented them. CONCLUSIONS: The broad scope of medical ML applications and potential patient harms demand an increased emphasis on evaluation and mitigation of racial bias in clinical ML. However, the adoption of algorithmic fairness principles in medicine remains inconsistent and is limited by poor data availability and ML model reporting. We recommend that researchers and journal editors emphasize standardized reporting and data availability in medical ML studies to improve transparency and facilitate evaluation for racial bias.

Deep learning-based artificial intelligence model for identifying swallow types in esophageal high-resolution manometry.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to build and evaluate a deep learning, artificial intelligence (AI) model to automatically classify swallow types based on raw data from esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). METHODS: HRM studies on patients with no history of esophageal surgery were collected including 1,741 studies with 26,115 swallows labeled by swallow type (normal, hypercontractile, weak-fragmented, failed, and premature) by an expert interpreter per the Chicago Classification. The dataset was stratified and split into train/validation/test datasets for model development. Long short-term memory (LSTM), a type of deep-learning AI model, was trained and evaluated. The overall performance and detailed per-swallow type performance were analyzed. The interpretations of the supine swallows in a single study were further used to generate an overall classification of peristalsis. KEY RESULTS: The LSTM model for swallow type yielded accuracies from the train/validation/test datasets of 0.86/0.81/0.83. The model's interpretation for study-level classification of peristalsis yielded accuracy of 0.88 in the test dataset. Among model misclassification, 535/698 (77%) swallows and 25/35 (71%) studies were to adjacent categories, for example, normal to weak or normal to ineffective, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: A deep-learning AI model can automatically and accurately identify the Chicago Classification swallow types and peristalsis classification from raw HRM data. While future work to refine this model and incorporate overall manometric diagnoses are needed, this study demonstrates the role that AI will serve in the interpretation and classification of esophageal HRM studies.