Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(5): ofae244, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756762

RESUMO

Background: Multistep laboratory testing is recommended for the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). The aim of this study was to present the impact of multistep CDI diagnostic testing in an academic hospital system and evaluate the toxin B gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values of PCR-positive tests. Methods: In October 2022, our system began reflex testing all PCR-positive stool samples with the C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (Techlab), an enzyme immunoassay-based test with results for the glutamate dehydrogenase antigen (GDH) and C difficile toxin A/B. Hospital-onset (HO) CDI and CDI antibiotic use before and after testing were tracked. Ct values were obtained from the Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory. Receiver operating curve analysis was used to examine the sensitivity and specificity for identifying GDH+/toxin+ and GDH-/toxin- at various Ct thresholds. Results: The HO-CDI rate decreased from 0.352 cases per 1000 patient-days to 0.115 cases per 1000 patient-days post-reflex testing (P < .005). Anti-CDI antibiotics use decreased, but the decrease was not commensurate with CDI rates following reflex testing. PCR+/GDH+/toxin+ samples had a lower mean Ct value than PCR+/GDH-/toxin- samples (23.3 vs 33.5, P < .0001). A Ct value of 28.65 could distinguish between those 2 groups. Fifty-four percent of PCR+/GDH+/toxin- samples had a Ct value below that cut-off, suggesting the possibility of CDI with a negative toxin test. Conclusions: Reflex testing for a laboratory diagnosis of CDI results in rapid, systemwide decreases in the rate of HO-CDI. Additional research is needed to distinguish CDI from C difficile colonization in patients with discordant testing.

2.
BMJ Glob Health ; 8(7)2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37423621

RESUMO

High-level isolation units (HLIUs) are specially designed facilities for care and management of patients with suspected or confirmed high-consequence infectious diseases (HCIDs), equipped with unique infrastructure and operational features. While individual HLIUs have published on their experiences caring for patients with HCIDs and two previous HLIU consensus efforts have outlined key components of HLIUs, we aimed to summarise the existing literature that describes best practices, challenges and core features of these specialised facilities. A narrative review of the literature was conducted using keywords associated with HLIUs and HCIDs. A total of 100 articles were used throughout the manuscript from the literature search or from alternate methods like reference checks or snowballing. Articles were sorted into categories (eg, physical infrastructure, laboratory, internal transport); for each category, a synthesis of the relevant literature was conducted to describe best practices, experiences and operational features. The review and summary of HLIU experiences, best practices, challenges and components can serve as a resource for units continuing to improve readiness, or for hospitals in early stages of developing their HLIU teams and planning or constructing their units. The COVID-19 pandemic, a global outbreak of mpox, sporadic cases of viral haemorrhagic fevers in Europe and the USA, and recent outbreaks of Lassa fever, Sudan Ebolavirus, and Marburg emphasise the need for an extensive summary of HLIU practices to inform readiness and response.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Transmissíveis , Febres Hemorrágicas Virais , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Febres Hemorrágicas Virais/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle
3.
Ther Adv Infect Dis ; 10: 20499361231179668, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37332294

RESUMO

Background: Select circumstances require outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). The potency of OPAT agents presents an increased risk of adverse events and unscheduled medical care. We analyzed these outcomes among OPAT recipients as part of the implementation of a collaborative OPAT program. Methods: Adult patients discharged home from an academic hospital with OPAT between January 2019 and June 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort; participants discharged between June 2020 and June 2021 were part of the collaborative OPAT program. Patients with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Data on patient characteristics and outcomes were collected from electronic medical records by two reviewers. Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify predictors of vascular access device (VAD) complications, adverse drug events (ADEs), and OPAT-related emergency department (ED) visits and rehospitalizations. Results: Among 265 patients included in the cohort, 57 (21.5%) patients experienced a VAD complication; obesity [odds ratio (OR): 3.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-8.73; p = 0.01) and multi-drug therapy (OR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.21-5.39; p = 0.01) were associated with an increased odds of VAD complication. Eighty-two (30.9%) participants experienced an ADE; 30 (11.3%) experienced a severe/serious ADE. Lipo/glycopeptide receipt, (OR: 5.28; 95% CI: 1.89-15.43; p < 0.01) and Black/African American race (OR: 4.85; 95% (CI): 1.56-15.45; p < 0.01) were associated with an increased odds of severe/serious ADE. Inclusion in the OPAT collaborative was associated with a decreased odds of severe/serious ADE (OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08-0.77; p = 0.01). Fifty-eight (21.9%) patients experienced an OPAT-related ED visit and 53 (20.0%) experienced an OPAT-related rehospitalization. VAD complication (OR: 2.37; 95% (CI): 1.15-4.86, p = 0.02) and ADEs (OR: 2.19; CI: 1.13-4.22; p = 0.02) were associated with OPAT-related ED visits. ADE was associated with 90-day OPAT-related rehospitalization (OR: 3.21; (CI): 1.59-6.58; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Adverse safety events and OPAT-related unscheduled care occurred often in our cohort. A structured OPAT program that includes ID pharmacist antibiotic reconciliation may reduce rates of ADEs.

4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(9): 1467-1471, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36912330

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Healthcare workers (HCWs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are disproportionately affected by severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To characterize factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity among LTCF HCWs, we performed a retrospective cohort study among HCWs in 32 LTCFs in the Minneapolis-St Paul region. METHODS: We analyzed the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity among LTCF HCWs during weeks 34-52 of 2020. LTCF and HCW-level characteristics, including facility size, facility risk score for resident-HCW contact, and resident-facing job role, were modeled in univariable and multivariable generalized linear regressions to determine their association with SARS-CoV-2 positivity. RESULTS: Between weeks 34 and 52, 440 (20.7%) of 2,130 unique HCWs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at least once. In the univariable model, non-resident-facing HCWs had lower odds of infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.70). In the multivariable model, the odds remained lower for non-resident-facing HCW (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36-0.71), and those in medium- versus low-risk facilities experienced higher odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.08-2.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that COVID-19 cases are related to contact between HCW and residents in LTCFs. This association should be considered when formulating infection prevention and control policies to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in LTCFs.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Assistência de Longa Duração , Estudos Retrospectivos , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde
5.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 4519, 2021 02 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33633264

RESUMO

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). However, standardization of FMT products is essential for its broad implementation into clinical practice. We have developed an oral preparation of freeze-dried, encapsulated microbiota, which is ~ 80% clinically effective, but results in delayed engraftment of donor bacteria relative to administration via colonoscopy. Our objective was to measure the engraftment potential of freeze-dried microbiota without the complexity of variables associated with oral administration. We compared engraftment of identical preparations and doses of freeze-dried microbiota following colonoscopic (9 patients) versus oral administration (18 patients). Microbiota were characterized by sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, and engraftment was determined using the SourceTracker algorithm. Oligotyping analysis was done to provide high-resolution patterns of microbiota engraftment. Colonoscopic FMT was associated with greater levels of donor engraftment within days following the procedure (ANOVA P = 0.035) and specific increases in the relative abundances of donor Lachnospiraceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Porphyromonadaceae (P ≤ 0.033). Lower relative abundances of Bacteroidaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Ruminococcaceae families were associated with clinical failures. These results suggest that further optimization of oral capsule FMT may improve its engraftment efficiency and clinical efficacy.


Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Microcirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biodiversidade , Gerenciamento Clínico , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Feminino , Liofilização , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Masculino , Metagenoma , Metagenômica/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(7): ofaa271, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33117855

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel pathogen causing the current worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Due to insufficient diagnostic testing in the United States, there is a need for clinical decision-making algorithms to guide testing prioritization. METHODS: We recruited participants nationwide for a randomized clinical trial. We categorized participants into 3 groups: (1) those with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, (2) those with probable SARS-CoV-2 infection (pending test or not tested but with a confirmed COVID-19 contact), and (3) those with possible SARS-CoV-2 infection (pending test or not tested and with a contact for whom testing was pending or not performed). We compared the frequency of self-reported symptoms in each group and categorized those reporting symptoms in early infection (0-2 days), midinfection (3-5 days), and late infection (>5 days). RESULTS: Among 1252 symptomatic persons screened, 316 had confirmed, 393 had probable, and 543 had possible SARS-CoV-2 infection. In early infection, those with confirmed and probable SARS-CoV-2 infection shared similar symptom profiles, with fever most likely in confirmed cases (P = .002). Confirmed cases did not show any statistically significant differences compared with unconfirmed cases in symptom frequency at any time point. The most commonly reported symptoms in those with confirmed infection were cough (82%), fever (67%), fatigue (62%), and headache (60%), with only 52% reporting both fever and cough. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic persons with probable SARS-CoV-2 infection present similarly to those with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was no pattern of symptom frequency over time.

7.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 40(1): 40-46, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30451128

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Recovery of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae from a cluster of patients in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) prompted an epidemiologic investigation for a common exposure. METHODS: Clinical and microbiologic data from MICU patients were retrospectively reviewed, MICU bronchoscopes underwent culturing and borescopy, and bronchoscope reprocessing procedures were reviewed. Bronchoscope and clinical MDR isolates epidemiologically linked to the cluster underwent molecular typing using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) followed by whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: Of the 33 case patients, 23 (70%) were exposed to a common bronchoscope (B1). Both MDR P. aeruginosa and K. pneumonia were recovered from the bronchoscope's lumen, and borescopy revealed a luminal defect. Molecular testing demonstrated genetic relatedness among case patient and B1 isolates, providing strong evidence for horizontal bacterial transmission. MDR organism (MDRO) recovery in 19 patients was ultimately linked to B1 exposure, and 10 of 19 patients were classified as belonging to an MDRO pseudo-outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance of bronchoscope-derived clinical culture data was important for early detection of this outbreak, and whole-genome sequencing was important for the confirmation of findings. Visualization of bronchoscope lumens to confirm integrity should be a critical component of device reprocessing.


Assuntos
Broncoscópios/microbiologia , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Infecções por Klebsiella/epidemiologia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Pseudomonas/epidemiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Surtos de Doenças , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma
9.
JMM Case Rep ; 4(9): e005110, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29114392

RESUMO

Introduction. Coronary artery stents are an uncommon site for infection. Only a handful of case reports describe this condition, and Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequent pathogen. Although rare, coronary stent infections are associated with a high mortality rate. Case presentation. We describe the case of a 50-year-old man with a past medical history of seven prior meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections over the previous 12 months, who presented with fever and was found to have persistent MRSA bacteraemia. During his hospital course, he developed chest pain and underwent coronary angiography, which revealed a left circumflex coronary to left atrium fistula, presumably due to endarteritis/sent infection. He was treated with combination parenteral antibiotics that were succeeded by oral suppressive therapy. Six months after his diagnosis of coronary stent infection, he suffered a fatal cardiac arrest. Conclusion. Coronary artery stents are an infrequent source of infection; when they occur, they are typically due to S. aureus, have a high mortality and ideally are treated with surgical intervention.

10.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 38(3): 340-347, 2017 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27989249

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE To determine risk factors for the development of surgical site infections (SSIs) in neurosurgery patients undergoing spinal fusion. DESIGN Retrospective case-control study. SETTING Large, academic, quaternary care center. PATIENTS The study population included all neurosurgery patients who underwent spinal fusion between August 1, 2009, and August 31, 2013. Cases were defined as patients in the study cohort who developed an SSI. Controls were patients in the study cohort who did not develop an SSI. METHODS To achieve 80% power with an ability to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 2, we performed an unmatched case-control study with equal numbers of cases and controls. RESULTS During the study period, 5,473 spinal fusion procedures were performed by neurosurgeons in our hospital. With 161 SSIs recorded during the study period, the incidence of SSIs associated with these procedures was 2.94%. While anterior surgical approach was found to be a protective factor (OR, 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.52), duration of procedure (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.29-1.93), American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or 4 (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.00-3.18), and hospitalization within the prior 30 days (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.37-24.57) were found in multivariate analysis to be independent predictors of SSI following spinal fusion. Prior methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization was highly associated with odds 20 times higher of SSI following spinal fusion (OR, 20.30; 95% CI, 4.64-8.78). CONCLUSIONS In additional to nonmodifiable risk factors, prior colonization with MRSA is a modifiable risk factor very strongly associated with development of SSI following spinal fusion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:348-352.


Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Cavidade Nasal/microbiologia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
12.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 12(8): 967-80, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24848084

RESUMO

Clostridium difficile (CD) infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare associated diarrhea despite intense hospital infection prevention programs. A substantial proportion of the population is asymptomatically colonized with CD, and evidence is mounting that these individuals serve as a reservoir for CDI. The purpose of this review is to discuss the mechanisms by which individuals may harbor toxigenic CD but remain asymptomatic, the evidence that asymptomatically colonized individuals serve as a source of CDI, and the implications of this potential CD reservoir for healthcare infection prevention.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Animais , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/transmissão , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Clostridioides difficile/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Reservatórios de Doenças , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/prevenção & controle , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/transmissão , Técnicas de Genotipagem , Humanos
13.
J Clin Microbiol ; 52(7): 2406-9, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24759727

RESUMO

Previous studies suggested that 7 to 15% of healthy adults are colonized with toxigenic Clostridium difficile. To investigate the epidemiology, genetic diversity, and duration of C. difficile colonization in asymptomatic persons, we recruited healthy adults from the general population in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Participants provided epidemiological and dietary intake data and submitted stool specimens. The presence of C. difficile in stool specimens was determined by anaerobic culture. Stool specimens yielding C. difficile underwent nucleic acid testing of the tcdA gene segment with a commercial assay; tcdC genotyping was performed on C. difficile isolates. Subjects positive for C. difficile by toxigenic anaerobic culture were asked to submit additional specimens. One hundred six (81%) of 130 subjects submitted specimens, and 7 (6.6%) of those subjects were colonized with C. difficile. Seven distinct tcdC genotypes were observed among the 7 C. difficile-colonized individuals, including tcdC genotype 20, which has been found in uncooked ground pork in this region. Two (33%) out of 6 C. difficile-colonized subjects who submitted additional specimens tested positive for identical C. difficile strains on successive occasions, 1 month apart. The prevalence of C. difficile carriage in this healthy cohort is concordant with prior estimates. C. difficile-colonized individuals may be important reservoirs for C. difficile and may falsely test positive for infections due to C. difficile when evaluated for community-acquired diarrhea caused by other enteric pathogens.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Voluntários Saudáveis , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Toxinas Bacterianas/genética , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Enterotoxinas/genética , Fezes/microbiologia , Comportamento Alimentar , Feminino , Variação Genética , Genótipo , Técnicas de Genotipagem , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Proteínas Repressoras/genética , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...