Neurological consultation with an autistic patient.

Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition with a very heterogeneous presentation. Autistic people are more likely to have unmet healthcare needs, making it essential that healthcare professionals are 'autism-aware'. In this article, we provide an overview of how autism presents and use case studies to illustrate how a neurological consultation in an outpatient clinic environment could prove challenging for a autistic person. We suggest how to improve communication with autistic patients in clinic and highlight the importance of a patient-centred and flexible approach.

Quality assessment of a large primary GP skin cancer service in Auckland, New Zealand.

AIM: Waitemata District Health Board has implemented a new approach to the management of skin cancers by triaging lesions to specialist-trained general practitioners (GPSI) with the aim of reducing patient wait times and treatment costs. The primary outcome was to determine positive margin rates for the GP surgeons, with secondary outcome being infection rates. METHOD: A retrospective audit was conducted on all excisions (n=2,705) performed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016 by the 13 WDHB GPSIs. Electronic patient records were accessed to review data. Each lesion was classified into benign, in-situ (pre-malignant) and malignant categories. Surgical margins were analysed for non-melanotic skin cancers (NMSC) and determined as positive, close or negative. Infection rates determined by microbiology results and prescribing information and time to treat analyses were conducted. RESULTS: WDHB GPSIs performed 2,705 excisions, 1,887 (69.8%) of which were malignant lesions. Among the 1,486 NMSC excised, a positive surgical margin was observed in 51 (3.4%). There were 294 (10.9%) cases of infection in 2,705 excisions. Median time to treat was 31 days across all lesions. New Zealand papers from the last two decades estimate the NMSC positive margin rate among primary care physicians varies between 16-31%; most recent papers have published rates 6.8-9.5%.European publications describe positive margin rates ranging between 13.9-33.5%. CONCLUSION: This study validates the use of surgically trained GP surgeons and shows their integral role in managing the high volume of skin cancer in New Zealand.

E-referrals and teledermatoscopy grading for melanoma: a successful model of care.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: An e-referral system was developed at a tertiary care hospital in Auckland, New Zealand in 2014 for suspected cutaneous malignancy. E-referrals include patient information, a description of the lesion(s), biopsy results and/or attached photograph(s). Experienced surgical oncologists prioritised the referrals and selected a management option or referred them for a teledermatoscopy opinion. Our aim was to review the efficacy of e-referrals for improving diagnostic accuracy for melanoma. METHODS: Referrals received in 2016 including images and categorisation as confirmed, likely or suspected melanoma by the triage specialist were evaluated. Concordance of the pathological diagnosis with the triage diagnosis and teledermatoscopy diagnosis was determined for each referral. RESULTS: 809 of 3470 e-referrals for skin cancer were categorised as confirmed, likely or suspected melanoma. 230 (28.4%) of these included a referral histopathology confirming melanoma/melanoma in situ. Of the remaining 579 referrals, 315 were sent for urgent diagnostic excision and 264 were referred for teledermatoscopy. 120 of the 315 sent for urgent excision were confirmed as melanoma (53) or melanoma in situ (67) on histopathology: a positive predictive value (PPV) of 38.1% and number needed to excise (NNE) of 2.6. Less than 10% of referrals triaged for teledermatoscopy were confirmed as melanoma (24/264). Almost half of all referrals (374/809, 45.6%) included melanoma/melanoma in situ. The melanoma: melanoma in situ ratio was 1: 1.18. CONCLUSIONS: The e-referral and teledermatoscopy service for suspected melanoma has proven fewer unnecessary excisions of benign lesions than previously reported.

Safety of Lipofilling in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Lipotransfer represents a technical revolution in plastic surgery and is increasingly used worldwide. Although known for several decades, lipofilling has only recently found widespread use in patients with breast cancer to improve the results of breast reconstructions and to correct deformities after conservative treatment. The plastic surgery literature underlines the technique's versatility and the quality of the results, showing lipofilling as an effective cosmetic procedure and proposing it as a safe, neutral biological material that is able to restore the body contour. Several studies underline the power of transferred fat to regenerate blood supply in skin disorders following radiotherapy.

A case-controlled study of the oncologic safety of fat grafting.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no clinical evidence of oncologic risk associated with fat grafting, although its safety has been questioned. The authors investigated the risk of relapse associated with fat grafting in women with a history of breast cancer. METHODS: Of 328 women with previously treated malignant breast disease who underwent fat grafting at the Nottingham Breast Institute, complete data were available for 211 (invasive carcinoma, n = 184; ductal carcinoma in situ, n = 27). Mean follow-up was 88 months after primary cancer surgery and 32 months after fat grafting. Control subjects were matched 2:1 for date of primary cancer operation (within 2 years), age (within 5 years), type of surgery, tumor histology, estrogen receptor status, and disease-free status by time equivalent to that of fat grafting. Final endpoints were tumor recurrence and death. Outcome results were compared with a systematic review of all patients undergoing fat grafting with adequate follow-up reported in the literature. RESULTS: No significant excess oncologic events were observed in patients who had fat grafting compared to controls with regard to local (0.95 percent versus 1.90 percent; p = 0.33), regional (0.95 percent versus 0 percent; p = 0.16), and distant recurrences (3.32 percent versus 2.61 percent; p = 0.65). A systematic review identified case series with a total of 1573 women who had fat grafting after primary oncologic breast surgery. The locoregional relapse rate for these patients was 2.92 percent (0.95 percent per year). CONCLUSION: This study has found no evidence of increased oncologic risk associated with fat grafting in women previously treated for breast cancer. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.