Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
F S Rep ; 2(4): 454-461, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34934987

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy and safety of a novel nonhormonal therapeutic agent, cabergoline, compared with that of the standard clinical therapy, norethindrone acetate (NETA), for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain in young women with endometriosis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Women (n = 9) with surgically confirmed endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS: A random, double-blind assignment to either NETA (5 mg/day) + placebo twice weekly or cabergoline (0.5 mg) twice weekly + placebo daily for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We collected the measures of pelvic pain and laboratory parameters every 3 months. RESULTS: We observed a decrease in pain scores and increase in pain relief in women randomized to receive cabergoline, who appeared to show similar or more improvements than women treated with NETA. The serum measures of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 declined over 6 months in those who received cabergoline. Cabergoline was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Safe, effective adjunct treatments are lacking for patients with endometriosis who do not respond to standard care. Because the growth of endometriosis requires angiogenesis, blood vessel growth is an attractive therapeutic target. This pilot study suggests that cabergoline, a vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitor, is an effective therapeutic option for women with chronic pain due to endometriosis. Building upon this investigation, we will conduct larger, randomized trials of cabergoline, advancing research on the best treatments for endometriosis-particularly disease resistant to hormonal therapies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov; registration number NCT02542410.

2.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 34(2): 196-202, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33278562

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Hypothalamic amenorrhea is common in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with anorexia nervosa (AN), and ovarian reserve is not routinely assessed. AN increases rates of fertility problems, but how or when AN negatively influences future fertility is unclear. We sought to determine whether biomarkers of ovarian reserve were impacted in AYA with AN. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Females with AN and amenorrhea (n = 97) at the pre-intervention visit of a clinical trial, n = 19 females without an eating disorder or menstrual dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations. RESULTS: AMH levels were higher in AYA with AN than unaffected adolescents (4.7 vs. 3.2 ng/mL; P = .03). Neither FSH nor inhibin B differed between groups. In 19.6% of participants with AN, AMH levels were elevated above the normal range (>6.78 ng/mL). These subjects had a longer disease duration than those with normal AMH levels (9 vs. 3 mos; P = .03); age or degree of malnutrition did not differ between AN subjects with normal or elevated AMH. CONCLUSIONS: AMH levels appear to be normal or elevated in AYA with AN. Low AMH in a patient with AN should raise clinical concern regarding ovarian reserve, and should not be attributed to degree of malnutrition alone. Currently, AMH is not regularly assessed during routine AN clinical care. However, our findings suggest some clinical utility in identifying those patients with reduced ovarian reserve. Potential links between the hypothalamic amenorrhea suffered by patients with AN and PCOS should be explored.


Assuntos
Amenorreia/fisiopatologia , Anorexia Nervosa/fisiopatologia , Hormônio Antimülleriano/sangue , Doenças Ovarianas/sangue , Reserva Ovariana , Adolescente , Amenorreia/etiologia , Anorexia Nervosa/complicações , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Ovarianas/etiologia , Sujeitos da Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Adolesc Health ; 63(6): 766-772, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30454733

RESUMO

PURPOSE: While endometriosis is recognized to have a high patient burden for adults, the level of morbidity it causes for adolescents has been understudied, and may be minimized by clinicians. The purpose of this study was to determine whether endometriosis has a significant impact on quality of life (QOL) for adolescents and young adults. METHODS: Five hundred and sixty-seven participants (360 cases and 207 controls) aged <25 years old who are enrolled in the Women's Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood longitudinal study were included in this analysis. Participants were enrolled from medical clinics and the communities surrounding Boston, MA. Participants completed an expanded World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project standard clinical questionnaire that included the Short Form-36 (SF-36), a widely used measure of health-related QOL. We calculated SF-36 physical component summary and mental component summary scores, as well as eight subscale scores. On the SF-36, lower scores reflect greater impairment. RESULTS: Adolescents with endometriosis had significantly lower physical component summary (mean [standard deviation]: 43.4 [11.1] vs. 53.8 [7.6], p < .0001) and mental component summary (43.3 [12.3] vs. 46.3 [10.8], p = .008) scores compared to controls, as well as lower scores on all eight subscales. More cases than controls reported mental health diagnoses, pain medication use, and avoidance of exercise during menstruation. Among cases, earlier age at menarche, more severe pelvic pain, and longer duration of diagnostic delay were associated with poorer QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Endometriosis is associated with significantly worse reports of QOL for adolescents and young women with endometriosis compared to unaffected peers. Earlier menarche was associated with poorer physical health-related QOL among cases, whereas severe pelvic pain was associated with both poorer physical and mental health-related QOL among cases. Impairment in QOL is not limited to adults with endometriosis, but affects younger patients as well.


Assuntos
Endometriose/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Boston , Criança , Diagnóstico Tardio , Endometriose/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Transtornos do Humor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pélvica , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 31(4): 376-381, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29551430

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential occurrence of long-term side effects and tolerability of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) plus 2 different add-back regimens in adolescent patients with endometriosis. DESIGN: Follow-up questionnaire sent in 2016 to patients who participated in a drug trial between 2008 and 2012. SETTING: Tertiary care center in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Female adolescents with surgically confirmed endometriosis (n = 51) who enrolled in a GnRHa plus add-back trial as adolescents. INTERVENTIONS: Leuprolide depot 11.25 mg intramuscular injection every 3 months, plus oral norethindrone acetate 5 mg daily or oral norethindrone acetate 5 mg daily and oral conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Side effects during and after treatment, irreversible side effects, changes in pain, overall satisfaction. RESULTS: The response rate was 61% (25 of 41; 10 subjects could not be located). Almost all (24 of 25) reported side effects during treatment; 80% (16 of 21) reported side effects lasting longer than 6 months after stopping treatment. Almost half (9 of 20) reported side effects they considered irreversible, including memory loss, insomnia, and hot flashes. Despite side effects, participants rated GnRHa plus add-back as the most effective hormonal medication for treating endometriosis pain; two-thirds (16 of 25) would recommend it to others. More participants who received a modified 2-drug add-back regimen vs standard 1-drug add-back would recommend GnRHa and believed it was the most effective hormonal medication. CONCLUSION: Subjects believed that GnRHa used with add-back was effective and would recommend it to others, despite significant side effects. Those who received 2-drug add-back reported more success than those who received standard add-back. A subset of patients reported side effects they consider to be irreversible.


Assuntos
Endometriose/tratamento farmacológico , Estrogênios Conjugados (USP)/efeitos adversos , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/efeitos adversos , Leuprolida/efeitos adversos , Noretindrona/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Boston , Estrogênios Conjugados (USP)/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Humanos , Leuprolida/uso terapêutico , Estudos Longitudinais , Noretindrona/uso terapêutico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA