Simple Modification of a DSAEK Carrier Enables Graft Insertion by Injection Without Compromising Endothelial Cell Viability.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the quality and feasibility of preloading Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) grafts into a modified EndoGlide Ultrathin system for graft injection. METHODS: DSAEK grafts were prepared by experienced processing technicians at 2 separate locations, loaded into a modified EndoGlide Ultrathin, and placed in storage media. Grafts processed at one location were shipped cross-country overnight to the other location and were examined on arrival for positioning within the modified EndoGlide Ultrathin. All grafts were ejected and analyzed for endothelial cell loss (ECL) with calcein acetoxymethyl staining and FIJI segmentation. A subset of grafts was measured by optical coherence tomography for graft thickness 1 hour after cut, 1 hour after loading, and 1 day after loading. RESULTS: No grafts were displaced from the modified carrier over 3 shipping events (n = 9), and all grafts (n = 18) were successfully ejected. Grafts loaded into the modified carrier and ejected exhibited no more cell loss than grafts loaded into the standard carrier and removed by pull-through (14.0% ± 2.8% vs. 12.2% ± 3.4%, respectively, P = 0.24). Carrier modification skills can be successfully transferred as grafts loaded by a processing technician new to carrier modification were within the acceptable limit of 25% ECL for transplant DSAEK grafts. Graft thickness increased significantly (P < 0.05) between the postcut and 1-hour postload measurement and the postcut and 24-hour postload measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoGlide Ultrathin can be modified to enable its use for graft injection while not compromising the ability to use the pull-through method for graft delivery. Preloaded DSAEK grafts swell significantly during the 24-hour storage period, and patterns of ECL may be linked to swelling.

Understanding DNA Damage Response and DNA Repair in Multiple Myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by several genetic abnormalities, including chromosomal translocations, genomic deletions and gains, and point mutations. DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair mechanisms are altered in MM to allow for tumor development, progression, and resistance to therapies. Damaged DNA rarely induces an apoptotic response, given the presence of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) loss-of-function or mutations, as well as deletions, mutations, or downregulation of tumor protein p53 (TP53) and tumor protein p73 (TP73). Moreover, DNA repair mechanisms are either hyperactive or defective to allow for rapid correction of the damage or permissive survival. Medications used to treat patients with MM can induce DNA damage, by either direct effects (mono-adducts induced by melphalan), or as a result of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib. In this review, we will describe the mechanisms of DDR and DNA repair in normal tissues, the contribution of these pathways to MM disease progression and other phenotypes, and the potential therapeutic opportunities for patients with MM.

Prospective In Vitro Comparison of Kerasave and Optisol-GS Corneal Storage Solutions.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of Kerasave and Optisol-GS for hypothermic corneal storage for 14 days. METHODS: This study was a prospective laboratory investigation. Mate corneas were recovered into Kerasave or Optisol-GS (27 pairs) and stored at 2°C to 8°C for 14 days. Corneas were evaluated by trained eye bank technicians, and study parameters were compared between the initial and final evaluations. Endothelial cell density (ECD), hexagonality (HEX), and coefficient of variation (CV) were evaluated by specular microscopy, and central corneal thickness (CCT) was examined by optical coherence tomography after 1, 3, 7, and 14 days of storage. Corneal transparency was scored using slit lamp examination at days 1 and 14. RESULTS: Average ECD, HEX, and CV for the Kerasave (2653 ± 303 cells/mm 2 , 57 ± 4%, and 36 ± 3%) and Optisol-GS (2623 ± 306 cells/mm 2 , 57 ± 5%, and 36 ± 4%) groups were not significantly different at day 1. There was also no difference at any other study time points (all P > 0.05). ECD did not significantly change from day 1 to day 14 in either group ( P > 0.05), but a statistically significant change in HEX and CV was observed between day 1 and day 14 in both groups ( P < 0.01). Average CCT measured at day 1 for corneas stored in Kerasave was 622 ± 49 µm and those stored in Optisol-GS was 580 ± 35 µm ( P < 0.01). The difference in CCT measurements was not significantly different at day 14 (Kerasave: 674 ± 46 µm vs. Optisol-GS: 647 ± 58 µm, P > 0.05). Corneal transparency was not significantly different between the 2 groups at day 1 or day 14. CONCLUSIONS: The corneal quality and clinically relevant parameters including ECD, endothelial morphometry, and corneal transparency were not different in corneas stored in Kerasave or Optisol-GS for 14 days. The initial difference in CCT between the 2 groups decreased at day 14. These results demonstrated that Kerasave corneal storage solution preserves the corneal endothelium similarly to Optisol-GS.

Tissue Loss, Processing Time, and Primary Graft Failure in Eye Bank-Prepared Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Before and After Prestripped to Preloaded Graft Transition.

PURPOSE: To examine tissue loss rates, processing time, and primary graft failure (PGF) of "prestripped-only" Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts at a single eye bank and how these parameters changed after the introduction of steps to preload tissue among experienced processors. METHODS: Tissue loss and processing time during DMEK graft preparation as well as PGF were analyzed retrospectively at a single eye bank between 2012 and 2018. Outcomes were assessed in consecutive grafts before and after the introduction of preloading to the eye bank's standard operating procedure. RESULTS: A total of 1326 grafts were analyzed, composed of the first 663 preloaded DMEK grafts and, for comparison, the 663 DMEK grafts processed immediately before starting the preloaded service. Mean processing time increased from 17.0 ± 3.9 minutes to 26.0 ± 5.4 minutes with the advent of preloading (P < 0.01). Initially, average processing time increased dramatically, with a maximum processing time of 51 minutes, before regressing to the average. No significant difference in the rate of tissue wastage was observed before versus after the implementation of preloaded DMEK (1.2% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.48). PGF occurred in 7 grafts before the preloaded service and 10 grafts after starting the service (1.6% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Preloading does not affect tissue wastage for experienced technicians or the PGF rate but increases processing time. Eye banks that are considering adding preloading to their standard operating procedure may need to account for longer processing times in their daily operations.

Ink Retention and Endothelial Cell Viability After the Application of an Orientation Stamp Over an Air Bubble During Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation.

PURPOSE: To investigate stamp visibility and endothelial cell loss (ECL) after the application of an orientation mark to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts supported by an air bubble. METHODS: Eighteen DMEK grafts were prepared at an eye bank using a technique where an orientation mark was applied to the stromal surface of a DMEK graft that was supported by a small air bubble placed at the edge of the 2 endothelial surfaces of the graft. Grafts were evaluated at 2 and 5 days for stamp visibility and at 5 days with calcein-AM staining for ECL. Nine grafts underwent cross-country shipping, and the ECL of shipped and nonshipped grafts was compared using unpaired t test. RESULTS: All 18 DMEK grafts exhibited a single, solid, readily visible orientation mark 2 and 5 days after preparation with a mean ECL of 13.5% ± 4.9%. Shipping conditions had no effect on stain retention or ECL. CONCLUSIONS: The application of an orientation stamp to a DMEK graft over an air bubble in an eye bank setting results in a single, solid orientation mark that is readily visible within the period in which most eye bank-prepared tissue is used. This technique produces no further ECL compared with the methods where the orientation stamp is applied through a stromal window. Eye bank technicians and surgeons can be confident that this modified preparation technique results in transplant-quality DMEK grafts with the additional benefit of conserving the stromal cap for use in other anterior lamellar procedures, thereby making efficient use of donor tissue.

Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of the Cornea During Corneal Swelling: Should the Term "Descemet Membrane Folds" Be Reconsidered?

PURPOSE: Previous work has suggested that Descemet membrane (DM) folds arise in response to corneal swelling. However, their origin has not been closely explored. In this study, we used optical coherence tomography to evaluate whether DM folds arise secondary to folds in the middle stroma. METHODS: Serial optical coherence tomography images of donor cornea pairs in deionized water were taken for each of the following corneal manipulations: 1) untreated, 2) DM and the endothelium removed, 3) excised in the region of the deep middle/posterior stroma, and 4) excised in the middle stroma. RESULTS: For intact corneas, increasing duration in deionized water was marked by a progressive increase in corneal thickness and number of folds along the posterior surface. With DM and the endothelium removed, a similar phenomenon was observed. In the third set of corneas, the plane of resection created a structural separation in the region of the deep middle/posterior stroma. Folds were seen originating anterior to the resection plane. For corneas with the posterior and part of the middle stroma removed, the typical folds on the posterior surface as seen in the previous conditions were not observed. Instead, less numerous and smaller irregularities of the posterior surface of the resection plane were present. CONCLUSIONS: Folds in DM associated with corneal edema originate in the middle and posterior stroma and are secondarily transmitted into DM. On the basis of the stromal origin of these anatomic changes, "stromal folds" should be considered a more accurate term to replace "Descemet membrane folds."

Minimizing Endothelial Cell Loss Caused by Orientation Stamps on Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts.

PURPOSE: To quantify endothelial cell loss (ECL) caused by orientation stamps on prestripped and preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts, and to examine a method for reducing ECL using a smaller stamp. METHODS: Ten prestripped and 10 preloaded DMEK grafts were prepared with S-stamps. Ten additional preloaded DMEK grafts were prepared with both an S-stamp and a smaller F-stamp in different paracentral areas of the graft. The footprint of each stamp was measured using ink on cardstock. DMEK grafts were stored in viewing chambers filled with 20 mL of Optisol-GS for 3 days at 4°C. ECL was quantified using Calcein-AM staining and FIJI Weka Segmentation. RESULTS: S-stamps on prestripped DMEK grafts contributed an average ECL of 1.1% ± 0.5% (range: 0.6%-2.2%) toward total graft damage, whereas S-stamps on preloaded DMEK grafts contributed approximately twice that amount (average ECL: 2.0% ± 0.7%, range: 1.3%-3.1%, P = 0.004). Overall ECL for prestripped grafts (average: 7.1% ± 3.3%, range: 3.3%-13.7%) and preloaded grafts (average: 11.3% ± 4.2%, range: 6.9%-19.4%) was similar to previous reports. The footprint of the S-stamp was approximately 45% larger than that of the F-stamp. In 10 preloaded grafts marked with both stamps, the S-stamp caused an average ECL of 1.9% ± 0.6% (range: 1.2%-3.2%), whereas the smaller F-stamp caused an average ECL of 1.0% ± 0.2% (range: 0.8%-1.4%, P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of endothelial cells associated with graft-stamping was greater in preloaded tissue than in prestripped tissue and was less with a smaller F-stamp than with a larger S-stamp. Using a smaller stamp could help minimize ECL in prestripped and preloaded DMEK grafts.

Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Prestripped, Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts.

PURPOSE: To determine graft quality and feasibility of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts that are prestripped and preloaded into injectors by eye bank technicians before shipping to surgeons. METHODS: DMEK grafts (n = 31) were prepared from donor corneas and preloaded into Straiko Modified Jones tubes and set inside viewing chambers filled with 20 mL of Optisol-GS. Preloaded grafts were evaluated using specular microscopy and slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Endothelial cell loss (ECL) was captured by vital dye staining and quantified using FIJI. A subset of preloaded tissues was subjected to a shipping validation and 5-day storage assay. Fourteen additional DMEK grafts (not preloaded) were examined to quantify damage resulting from prestripping alone. RESULTS: Specular microscopy was able to be performed for all preloaded tissues. Average ECL for preloaded tissues quantified by vital dye staining and FIJI after overnight storage was 16.8% ± 5.9%, and differed from slit-lamp ECL estimation by an average of 5.3% ± 3.6%. The average damage caused by prestripping alone was 9.3% ± 5.9%, and it was significantly less than that of preloaded tissues (P < 0.01). Average ECL for preloaded tissues subjected to round-trip shipping events was 18.5% ± 12.4%, and ECL for tissues stored at 4°C for 5 days after preloading was 13.1% ± 9.5%. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to prepare, evaluate, and ship DMEK grafts loaded inside a glass carrier and viewing chamber. The ability to evaluate tissues after processing allows for adherence to the Eye Bank Association of America Medical Standards, and for surgeons to receive the most accurate tissue information.

The S-stamp in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Safely Eliminates Upside-down Graft Implantation.

PURPOSE: To present 6-month clinical outcomes from a series of 165 consecutive Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) procedures before and after the introduction of a novel stromal-sided S-stamp preparation technique that has decreased the incidence of iatrogenic primary graft failure by eliminating upside-down grafts. DESIGN: Retrospective nonrandomized comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: We included 165 consecutive eyes that had undergone DMEK surgery for Fuchs' or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. These cases were divided into 2 cohorts: the first cohort comprised 31 cases that used unstamped tissue before the S-stamp was introduced, and the second cohort comprised 133 cases after the S-stamp was incorporated into the standardized technique. A single unstamped DMEK case was performed after the introduction of the S-stamp for a total of 32 unstamped cases. METHODS: Donor materials were prepared at a single eye bank using a standardized technique, which subsequently incorporated the addition of a dry ink gentian violet S-stamp to the stromal side of Descemet membrane. All surgeries were performed at a single clinical site by 5 surgeons (2 attending surgeons and 3 fellows). Two of the 165 DMEK cases were performed for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (2 cases, 1 in each cohort), and the remaining cases were for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Primary outcome measures were assessed at 6 months and maintained in a prospective institutional review board-approved study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed the 6-month endothelial cell density, incidence of iatrogenic primary graft failure, upside-down graft implantation, and rebubble events. RESULTS: The S-stamp eliminated upside-down graft implantations (0/133 S-stamped vs 3/32 unstamped) and did not significantly alter 6-month endothelial cell loss (31±17% S-stamped vs 29±14% unstamped; P = 0.62) or frequency of rebubble (17/133 S-stamped vs 1/32 unstamped; P = 0.20). CONCLUSION: The incorporation of a stromal-sided S-stamp eliminates iatrogenic primary graft failure owing to upside-down implantation of DMEK grafts, without adversely affecting early postoperative complications or 6-month endothelial cell loss.

Eye Bank-Prepared Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Automated Descemet Membrane Endothelial Grafts.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of a femtosecond laser (FL) in the eye bank preparation of corneas for Descemet membrane (DM) automated endothelial keratoplasty (fDMAEK) and to compare endothelial cell death in graft preparations between fDMAEK, Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), and DM endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: Twenty cadaveric tissues were used to test the fDMAEK method. A 9.0-mm-diameter lamellar incision was made using the FL with a 6.0-mm perpendicular anterior ring cut that enabled a stromal rim by acting as a venting incision for bubble expansion. DM was pneumodissected off the central 6.0 mm of the tissue. The fDMAEK grafts were trephined and stained with a viability dye, calcein AM. The entire stained endothelial surface was digitally captured and the endothelial cell loss (ECL) was calculated using trainable segmentation software. For comparison, a series of 6 DSEK grafts and 8 DMEK grafts were created and analyzed. RESULTS: Six of 20 tissues (30%) were lost during fDMAEK preparation. In the 14 successful tissues, the average ECL was 30.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 25.3-35.6] compared with 21.1% (95% CI, 13.2-28.9, P = 0.09) in the 6 DSEK grafts and 22.5% (95% CI, 18.0-27.0, P = 0.04) in the 8 DMEK grafts. CONCLUSIONS: FLs are useful in preparing DMAEK tissue at the eye bank and may promote predictable and precise big bubbles and stromal rims. The fDMAEK preparation success improved with experience and laser adjustments. In fDMAEK, the ECL is higher than was previously reported in DMEK and DSEK, likely due to greater tissue manipulation, although not significantly higher than DSEK controls.

Risk factors for eye bank preparation failure of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue.

PURPOSE: To assess the results of a single eye bank preparing a high volume of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissues using multiple technicians to provide an overview of the experience and to identify possible risk factors for DMEK preparation failure. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: setting: Lions VisionGift and Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins Hospital. STUDY POPULATION: All 563 corneal tissues processed by technicians at Lions VisionGift for DMEK between October 2011 and May 2014 inclusive. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: Tissues were divided into 2 groups: DMEK preparation success and DMEK preparation failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared donor characteristics, including past medical history. RESULTS: The overall tissue preparation failure rate was 5.2%. Univariate analysis showed diabetes mellitus (P = .000028) and its duration (P = .023), hypertension (P = .021), and hyperlipidemia or obesity (P = .0004) were more common in the failure group. Multivariate analysis showed diabetes mellitus (P = .0001) and hyperlipidemia or obesity (P = .0142) were more common in the failure group. Elimination of tissues from donors either with diabetes or with hyperlipidemia or obesity reduced the failure rate from 5.2% to 2.2%. Trends toward lower failure rates occurring with increased technician experience also were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our work showed that tissues from donors with diabetes mellitus (especially with longer disease duration) and hyperlipidemia or obesity were associated with higher failure rates in DMEK preparation. Elimination of tissues from donors either with diabetes mellitus or with hyperlipidemia or obesity reduced the failure rate. In addition, our data may provide useful initial guidelines and benchmark values for eye banks seeking to establish and maintain DMEK programs.

Use of fourier-domain optical coherence tomography to evaluate anterior stromal opacities in donor corneas.

Purpose. To evaluate Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) as an adjunct to traditional slit lamp examination of donor corneas with suspected Anterior Stromal Opacities. Methods. Seven corneas suspected of having anterior stromal opacities by slit lamp examination were evaluated with FD-OCT. Each cornea was evaluated to confirm the presence of opacity and, if present, the depth of opacity was measured. Results. The opacity depth ranged from 82 µ m to 624 µ m. The initial slit lamp impressions of five of the seven corneas were confirmed by OCT. In two corneas, the OCT findings were different from the initial slit lamp impressions. Slit lamp examination of the first cornea gave the impression of anterior stromal scarring, but OCT showed that the opacity was limited to the epithelium. Slit lamp examination of the second cornea suggested opacity limited to the epithelium, but OCT identified significant sub-Bowman's scarring. In all cases, the Eye Bank Technicians reported that the location and depth of corneal opacity were more sharply defined by OCT than by slit lamp. Conclusion. The high resolution of OCT makes it easier to determine the location of corneal opacities compared to slit lamp examinations. This enhanced visualization can improve decisions regarding transplant suitability of donor corneas.

Evaluating DSAEK graft deturgescence in preservation medium after microkeratome cut with optical coherence tomography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft deturgescence in preservation medium after microkeratome cut using Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. METHODS: The central and peripheral thickness of DSAEK grafts was measured by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography immediately after microkeratome cuts and 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours afterward. All measurements were taken when the grafts were stored in 4°C preservation medium. The hourly change in central graft thickness and graft shape (peripheral graft thicknes - central graft thickness) was calculated and tracked over time. RESULTS: Five DSAEK grafts were measured. The average central graft thickness was 188.7 ± 44.4 µm (range, 146-255 µm) immediately after microkeratome cuts. The average central graft thickness was 147.5 ± 33.0 µm (range, 116-190 µm) after 4 hours in preservation medium (P < 0.001). The average hourly change in central graft thickness was -30.5 µm (P = 0.0051), -8.6 µm (P = 0.055), -2.0 µm (P = 0.42), and 0.0 µm (P = 0.93) at 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours, respectively, after microkeratome cuts. The average hourly change in graft shape was insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: DSAEK grafts become thinner after microkeratome cut and stabilize at approximately 2 hours. Therefore, DSAEK graft thickness should be measured at 1.5 to 3 hours after microkeratome cut.