Editor's Choice - Early and Late Outcomes after Transcarotid Revascularisation for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Transcarotid/transcervical revascularisation (TCAR) is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid stenting (tfCAS). This review aimed to evaluate pooled data on patients undergoing TCAR. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were used. REVIEW METHODS: This systematic review was conducted under Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Eligible studies (published online up to September 2020) reported 30 day mortality and stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) rates in patients undergoing TCAR. Data were pooled in a random effects model and weight of effect for each study was also reported. Quality of studies was evaluated according to Newcastle - Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Eighteen studies (three low, seven medium, and eight high quality) included 4 852 patients (4 867 TCAR procedures). The pooled 30 day mortality rate was 0.7% (n = 32) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5 - 1.0), 30 day stroke rate 1.4% (n = 62) (95% CI 1.0 - 1.7), and 30 day stroke/TIA rate 2.0% (n = 92) (95% CI 1.4 - 2.7). Pooled technical success was 97.6% (95% CI 95.9 - 98.8). The cranial nerve injury rate was 1.2% (95% CI 0.7 - 1.9) (n = 14; data from 10 studies) while the early myocardial infarction (MI) rate was 0.4% (95% CI 0.2 - 0.6) (n = 16; data from 17 studies). The haematoma/bleeding rate was 3.4% (95% CI 1.7 - 5.8) (n = 135; data from 10 studies), with one third of these cases needing drainage or intervention. Within a follow up of 3 - 40 months the restenosis rate was 4% (95% CI 0.1 - 13.1) (data from nine studies; n = 64/530 patients) and death/stroke rate 4.5% (95% CI 1.8 - 8.4) (data from five studies; n = 184/3 742 patients). Symptomatic patients had a higher risk of early stroke/TIA than asymptomatic patients (2.5% vs. 1.2%; odds ratio 1.99; 95% CI 1.01 - 3.92); p = .046; data from eight studies). CONCLUSION: TCAR is associated with promising early and late outcomes, with symptomatic patients having a higher risk of early cerebrovascular events. More prospective comparative studies are needed in order to verify TCAR as an established alternative treatment technique.

Open versus endovascular treatment of subclavian artery atherosclerotic disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare open and endovascular treatment of patients with subclavian artery atherosclerotic disease (SAAD) as far as early and late outcomes are concerned. METHODS: A systematic literature review conforming to established criteria was conducted to identify eligible articles published before January 2018. The following online search engines were used: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library (search conducted between December 2017 and January 2018). Eligible studies compared early and late major outcomes between open and endovascular therapy for patients suffering from SAAD. RESULTS: Overall, seven clinical studies included 731 patients undergoing 760 procedures in total (297 endovascular and 463 open procedures). The majority of procedures (99.7%) referred to symptomatic patients, and more patients undergoing open surgery had an occlusion compared with patients undergoing endovascular repair, the majority of whom had a stenosis. Regarding early outcomes (30-day death, cardiac events, technical success, and central nervous system events), there was no difference between the two methods. Only peripheral nervous system complications were more prevalent in patients undergoing open repair (odds ratio [OR], 7.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.142-22.921; P = .001). Regarding late outcomes, open repair was associated with significantly higher 1-year (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.954-9.619; P = .0003), 3-year (OR, 5.67; 95% CI, 2.881-11.167; P < .0001), and 5-year (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.906-9.567; P = .0004) primary patency rates compared with endovascular therapy. However, 5-year freedom from recurrent symptoms as well as 5-year overall survival showed no difference. CONCLUSIONS: Open repair and endovascular repair in patients with SAAD do not show any difference concerning the majority of early major outcomes, although more patients undergoing open repair had an occlusion. However, open surgery seems to prevail regarding long-term primary patency, although long-term survival and freedom from recurrent symptoms show no difference.

Risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative delirium (PODE) remains a common complication after vascular surgery procedures although the exact pathogenesis remains unclear, mainly because of its multifactorial character. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate pooled data on potential risk factors for PODE in patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted conforming to established criteria to identify eligible articles published from 1990 to 2016. Eligible studies evaluated potential risk factors for PODE after vascular surgery procedures, using both univariate and multivariate analysis. PODE was defined as a disturbance of consciousness with reduced ability to focus, sustain, or shift attention after vascular surgery procedures and was diagnosed in all studies using well-established criteria. Only risk factors reported in at least four studies were included in this review. Pooled results were calculated, and further multivariate regression analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Overall, nine studies (published from 2003 to 2015) including 2388 patients in total were evaluated (457 with and 1931 without PODE). Patients with PODE were older (73.27 vs 69.87 years; P < .0001) and showed a higher male sex rate (78.1% vs 73.5%; P = .043). Open aortic surgery was the most frequent procedure in this analysis, followed by lower limb revascularization. Patients with PODE also showed higher rates of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiac disease, and neurologic disease; lower hemoglobin level; larger duration of surgery; longer hospital and intensive care unit stay; and higher blood loss. Mean age (odds ratio [OR], 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.933-4.034; P < .0001), hypertension (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.469-2.554; P < .0001), cardiac disease (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 2.324-4.284; P < .0001), open aortic surgery (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.421-2.143; P < .0001), blood loss (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.007-1.010; P < .0001), hospital stay (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.953-2.614; P <. 0001), and intensive care unit stay (OR, 6.12; 95% CI, 4.699-7.957; P < .0001) were identified as the strongest risk predictors for PODE, followed by male sex, diabetes mellitus, neurologic disease, and history of smoking. However, body mass index, renal failure, preoperative hemoglobin level, and general anesthesia were not found to be risk factors for PODE in such patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study has confirmed that PODE after vascular surgery procedures is a multifactorial disease, and several independent risk factors have been identified. However, pooled data regarding the effect of PODE on primary outcomes after vascular surgery procedures are still lacking. The results of this review could contribute to the designation of future prediction models and improve prevention of PODE in these patients.