Efficacy, tolerability and patient's satisfaction for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with apremilast in the real-life setting of Campania region, Italy.

BACKGROUND: Little information is available from real-life studies evaluating the efficacy of apremilast in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: In this real-life study, we retrospectively examined a database of 231 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with apremilast (30 mg twice/day) and followed up for 52 weeks. Disease severity and treatment response were assessed by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at baseline and after 16, 24, and 52 weeks. Quality of life was assessed by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). RESULTS: PASI score decreased from 14.6 at baseline to 4.1 and 1.2 at 16 and 24 weeks. At 24 weeks, 86.7% of patients achieved a PASI score of ≤3 and this improved up to 52 weeks, where all patients had a PASI score of ≤3. At 24 weeks, PASI 75, 90 and 100 responses were achieved in 92%, 83.2% and 36.3% of patients, respectively. At 52 weeks, PASI 75, 90 and 100 response were achieved in 97%, 89.3% and 62% of patients, respectively. DLQI score was 12.4 at baseline and decreased to 2 at week 24, and close to 0 at week 52. No serious adverse event was reported during the treatment with apremilast. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-severe chronic psoriasis in a real world-setting apremilast was shown to be effective and safe up to 52 weeks.

Down syndrome and biological treatments in dermatology: Efficacy and safety in our real-life experience and review of literature.

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common chromosomal disorder; several dermatological conditions are common in these patients; among them, psoriasis and atopic dermatitis can be frequently encountered. From 2017 to today, we retrospectively identified 4 adults and 3 under 18-year-old patients treated with biological drugs, from our research database. The first endpoint of this study was to evaluate whether the biological drugs work in these special population, and a secondary endpoint was to evaluate any loss of efficacy or any side effects during follow-up. All patients were treated with biological drugs experience resolution of their psoriasis. Mean PASI (Psoriasis Area Severity Index), BSA (Body Surface Area) and DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) at baseline were 20, 16.5 and 25. At week 4, mean PASI, BSA and DLQI decreased, respectively, to 8, 6 and 12, while at week 24, mean values were, respectively, 3, 1.3 and 1. The patients that started therapy earlier, at week 52, do not have signs of recurrence and side effects. We highlighted that no official guidelines exist to approach these patients, from a literature evaluation the most employed drugs are anti-TNFα and in particular adalimumab. In our experience, the new anti-interleukin drugs seem to be well-tolerated, with no sides effect, good compliance and no loss of efficacy.

Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriasis and a Personal History of Malignancy: A Multicenter Real-Life Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited evidence to guide clinicians on the treatment of psoriasis with biologics in patients with a history of malignancy who are often excluded from clinical trials investigating biologics. The aim of this work is to report a multicenter real-life experience of secukinumab treatment in patients with psoriasis and a personal history of cancer. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with secukinumab for at least 24 weeks and a previous diagnosis of cancer at 15 Italian referral centers. The primary endpoint of the study was tumor recurrence or progression and new cancer diagnosis during treatment. Secondary outcome assessment of secukinumab effectiveness (reduction of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] score, improvement of Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI], itch and pain). RESULTS: Forty-two patients (27 male) were included. Malignancy was diagnosed in the previous 5 years in 21 (56.8%) and in the previous 10 years in 37 (88.1%). The mean interval between cancer diagnosis and the start of secukinumab treatment was 3.5 ± 3.3 years. No tumor recurrence nor progression occurred over a mean of 56 ± 31.7 weeks of treatment. Three patients developed a new malignancy not related to the previous cancer. At week 48, PASI 90 was reached by 64.7% of patients and PASI 100 by 38.2%. Mean DLQI, itch, and pain VAS scores significantly improved during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter real-life experience is the largest reported to date focusing on a specific biologic and adds evidence to the safety of secukinumab in psoriatic patients with a personal history of cancer.

Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in the Treatment of Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicentric, Prospective, Real-World, Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in atopic dermatitis (AD) have been defined in clinical trials, but no real-world data are currently available. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib in a real-world AD patient cohort that mostly included patients who failed the available systemic therapies, including dupilumab. METHODS: Prospective cohort study collecting data on upadacitinib-treated AD adult patients completing at least 16 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-three patients showed rapid and marked response to upadacitinib with significant reduction of all disease severity scores since the first follow-up visit. At week 16, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 75, EASI 90, and EASI 100 response was observed in 97.5%, 82.1%, and 69.2% of patients, respectively. EASI 90 response reflected the achievement of a clear or almost clear condition (POEM 0-2), self-evaluated by 79.5% of patients. Patients' quality of life improved as suggested by the achievement of DLQI 0/1 by 38.5% of patients at week 4, and by 76.9% at week 16. CONCLUSION: Elevated effectiveness and favorable safety of upadacitinib were confirmed in patients unresponsive to dupilumab, who were not included in upadacitinib trials.

A multidisciplinary care unit approach for the management of psoriatic arthritis: an Italian experience.

BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that can produce disabling joint symptoms, adding significantly to the physical and psychosocial burden of psoriasis. Early detection is important to allow the development of an appropriate care plan to delay the onset of PsA and maximize the patient's quality of life. Our aim was to present the criteria, based on evidence and expert opinion, for a multidisciplinary approach to the management of PsA in a patient already characterized by skin manifestation. METHODS: An expert panel from the principal psoriatic care units of the Campania region of Italy met to discuss their mutual experience of the multidisciplinary approach to the management of psoriatic disease and to describe an integrated dermatologic/rheumatologic approach focused on the early diagnosis, management, and treatment of PsA. RESULTS: Two types of consultation modalities were considered most relevant to the care of patients with psoriatic disease in Italy: the parallel approach and the face-to-face care unit approach. Screening criteria for multidisciplinary care unit admission were described, with dermatologists, as the primary managers of the majority of patients with psoriasis, playing a critical role in introducing patients early on to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: An integrated management approach may enhance patient care by ensuring early diagnosis and treatment, with the potential to achieve better outcomes for both skin and musculoskeletal manifestations of psoriasis. The multidisciplinary care unit model is an effective and satisfying collaborative approach, not only optimizing outcomes and satisfaction for the patient but strengthening collaboration between the specialties.

Long-term proactive management of psoriasis with calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate foam: an Italian consensus through a combined nominal group technique and Delphi approach.

BACKGROUND: Although long-term management of psoriasis is paramount, this approach is challenging in clinical practice. In the recent PSO-LONG trial, a fixed-dose combination of betamethasone dipropionate (BD) and calcipotriol (Cal) foam applied twice a week on non-consecutive days for 52 weeks (proactive treatment) reduced the risk of relapse. However, the role of Cal/BD foam in the long-term management of psoriasis needs further clarifications. The ProActive Management (PAM) program, a nationwide Italian project, aims at reaching a consensus on the role of proactive management of psoriasis. METHODS: A steering committee generated some statements through the nominal group technique (NGT). The statements were voted by an expert panel in an adapted Delphi voting process. RESULTS: Eighteen statements were proposed, and the majority of them (14/18) reached a consensus during the Delphi voting. The need to provide long-term proactive topical treatment to reduce the risk of relapse for the treatment of challenging diseases sites or in patients where phototherapy or systemic therapies are contraindicated/ineffective was widely recognized. A consensus was reached about the possibility to associate the proactive treatment with systemic and biological therapies, without the need for dose intensification, thus favoring a prolonged remission. Moreover, the proactive treatment was recognized as more effective than weekend therapy in increasing time free from relapses. Approaches to improve adherence, on the other hand, need further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion in guidelines of a proactive strategy among the effective treatment options will be a fundamental step in the evolution of a mild-moderate psoriasis therapeutic approach.

Hepatitis Virus Reactivation in Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Secukinumab in a Real-World Setting of Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C Infection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Biologics for psoriasis, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapies, may reactivate hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, as well in inactive carriers or patients with occult infection. However, some biologics, including anti-interleukin-17 therapies such as secukinumab, seem to be less likely to cause hepatitis reactivation. This study assessed the safety of secukinumab treatment in patients with psoriasis with HBV or HBC infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with secukinumab at seven Italian centers. Patients serologically positive for one or more of the following viral hepatitis markers were included: HCV antibody (± HCV-RNA positivity) and/or hepatitis B surface antigen, and/or HBV core antibody and/or HBV surface antibody (± HBV-DNA positivity). Patients received secukinumab 300 mg subcutaneously at week 0/1/2/3/4 then every 4 weeks; prophylactic therapy before starting secukinumab was prescribed where indicated. The primary study endpoint was the reactivation of hepatitis viral infection, defined as conversion to HBV-DNA or HCV-RNA positivity, with or without elevation of transaminases. RESULTS: Sixty patients (17 with concomitant psoriatic arthritis) were included. Thirteen subjects were hepatitis B surface antigen positive, 19 were HBV core antibody positive, and 30 were positive for the HCV antibody; however, all were HCV-RNA negative. After 53.5 ± 37.5 weeks of secukinumab therapy, hepatitis reactivation occurred in only one patient, who had a reactivation of both hepatitis B and hepatitis C. This patient had not undergone hepatitis B prophylaxis or hepatitis C treatment before secukinumab. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world data support the safety of secukinumab in patients with positive markers of HBV or HCV infection, when administered together with dedicated prophylaxis.

In this retrospective cohort study, 60 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were treated with secukinumab at seven Italian centers. Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-17A, a key cytokine associated with the development of psoriatic disease. All patients had markers of hepatitis B and/or C. Where appropriate, patients received prophylactic antiviral therapy before starting secukinumab at the standard dose for treating psoriasis in Italy. Secukinumab was administered at the labeled dose. After a mean duration treatment of 53.5 weeks, hepatitis reactivation (both B and C) occurred in one patient. This patient had not undergone hepatitis B prophylaxis or hepatitis C treatment before receiving secukinumab. The study is important, as some biologics for psoriasis, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapies, have been shown to reactivate both hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infections in inactive carriers, patients with occult hepatitis B virus infection, or patients with hepatitis C virus infections. However, there is evidence that second-generation biologic therapies, including those with anti-interleukin-17 activity, are less likely to cause hepatitis reactivation. This study supports the safety of secukinumab treatment in patients with psoriasis with hepatitis B and/or C.

Lack of reactivation of tuberculosis in patients with psoriasis treated with secukinumab in a real-world setting of latent tuberculosis infection.

BACKGROUND: Some biologics for psoriasis, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapies, may re-activate latent tuberculosis (TBC) infection with consequent morbidity and mortality. However, there is a low reported incidence of conversion to positive TBC status among patients with psoriasis treated with second-generation biologic therapies, particularly anti-interleukin (IL)-17 therapies such as secukinumab. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety profile of secukinumab in psoriasis patients with latent TBC infection. METHODS: Real-life data were collected by retrospective chart review on patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who showed positivity for TBC screening at baseline and underwent secukinumab treatment for psoriasis at six Italian centers. Patients received secukinumab 300 mg at week 0/1/2/3/4, then every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled; 30.5% also had psoriatic arthritis and other comorbidities were common. At baseline, the mean psoriasis duration was 14.5 years. Ten (17%) patients did not undergo prophylaxis before starting secukinumab. Conversely, isoniazid ± rifampicin or rifampicin alone prophylaxis was administered in 49/59 (83.1%) patients. After a mean treatment duration of 84 weeks, there were no cases of TBC reactivation and no unexpected safety signals. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab use over an extended period was safe in psoriasis patients with latent TBC, even in patients who did not receive chemoprophylaxis.

Is Apremilast a Safe Option in Patients with History of Melanoma? A Case Series and a Review of the Literature.

Background: Recently it has been reported that apremilast might promote melanogenesis and it would therefore not be safe to use this drug in patients with psoriasis who have a history of melanoma. Methods: From January 2017 to December 2020, we retrospectively identified, within a cohort of 635 patients in follow-up care for melanoma, 16 cases of patients with psoriasis treated with apremilast and history of melanoma. Patients were monitored at our unit for a mean duration of 36 months of follow up. Results: The use of apremilast, in our case series was, thus, effective in managing psoriasis without causing recurrence of previous melanoma or any new suspicious lesions which would need removal. Discussion: It has been speculated that apremilast might not be safe in patients who have a history of melanoma as it would be involved in the stimulation of melanogenesis and consequent possibility of recurrence of previous melanoma. Conclusion: Our data show that none of the patients treated with apremilast developed recurrence of melanoma at 36 months of follow-up. Further studies are necessary to confirm the safety of apremilast in a larger number of patients with concurrent malignancies, specifically melanoma, and for a longer follow-up period.

Topical and Conventional Systemic Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis: Have They Gone Out of Fashion?

Atopic dermatitis is a Th2 disease, due to relapse of IL-4 and IL-13 by Th2 cells. Despite the approval by FDA of dupilumab, the first monoclonal antibody for the severe forms, traditional drugs remain a milestone for the treatment of this dermatosis. Dermatologists need a good knowledge of all therapies for an integrated and personalized management of patients.