Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for the prevention and treatment of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a systematic review.

AIM: To identify and synthesize the evidence for the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions to promote the healing, and/or reduce the occurrence of, foot ulceration in people with diabetes. METHODS: In March 2019 we searched CENTRAL, Medline, Embase and PsycInfo for randomized controlled trials of interventions with psychosocial components for people with diabetes. The primary outcomes of this review were foot ulceration and healing. We assessed studies using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, the TIDieR checklist and GRADE. We conducted narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 31 randomized controlled trials (4511 participants), of which most (24 randomized controlled trials, 4093 participants) were prevention studies. Most interventions were educational with a modest psychosocial component. Ulceration and healing were not reported in most studies; secondary outcomes varied. Evidence was of low or very low quality because of high risks of bias and imprecision, and few studies reported adherence or fidelity. In groups where participants had prior ulceration, educational interventions had no clear effect on new ulceration (low-quality evidence). Two treatment studies, assessing continuous pharmacist support and an intervention to promote understanding of well-being, reported healing but their evidence was also of very low quality. CONCLUSION: Most psychosocial intervention randomized controlled trials assessing foot ulcer outcomes in people with diabetes were prevention studies, and most interventions were primarily educational. Ulcer healing and development were not well reported. There is a need for better understanding of psychological and behavioural influences on ulcer incidence, healing and recurrence in people with diabetes. Randomized controlled trials of theoretically informed interventions, which assess clinical outcomes, are urgently required. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42016052960).

Psychosocial and behavioural prognostic factors for diabetic foot ulcer development and healing: a systematic review.

AIM: To investigate whether ulceration, amputation and healing of foot ulcers in people living with diabetes are associated with psychosocial and behavioural factors. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library to March 2019 for longitudinal studies with multivariable analyses investigating independent associations. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. RESULTS: We identified 15 eligible studies involving over 12 000 participants. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, so we summarize narratively. Risk of bias was moderate or high. For ulceration, we found significantly different results for people with and without an ulcer history. For those with no ulcer history, moderate quality evidence suggests depression increases ulcer risk [three studies; e.g. hazard ratio (HR) 1.68 (1.20, 2.35) per Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) standard unit]. Better foot self-care behaviour reduces ulcer risk [HR 0.61 (0.40, 0.93) per Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities scale standard unit; one study]. For people with diabetes and previous ulcers, low- or very low-quality evidence suggests little discernible association between ulcer recurrence and depression [e.g. HR 0.88 (0.61, 1.27) per HADS standard unit], foot self-care, footwear adherence or exercise. Low-quality evidence suggests incomplete clinic attendance is strongly associated with amputation [odds ratio (OR) 3.84 (1.54, 9.52); one study]. Evidence for the effects of other psychosocial or behavioural factors on ulcer healing and amputation is very low quality and inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial and behavioural factors may influence the development of first ulcers. More high quality research is needed on ulcer recurrence and healing. (Open Science Framework Registration: https://osf.io/ej689).

Management of adults with diabetes on the haemodialysis unit: summary of guidance from the Joint British Diabetes Societies and the Renal Association.

Diabetic nephropathy remains the principal cause of end-stage renal failure in the UK and its prevalence is set to increase. People with diabetes and end-stage renal failure on maintenance haemodialysis are highly vulnerable, with complex comorbidities, and are at high risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, the leading cause of mortality in this population. The management of people with diabetes receiving maintenance haemodialysis is shared between diabetes and renal specialist teams and the primary care team, with input from additional healthcare professionals providing foot care, dietary support and other aspects of multidisciplinary care. In this setting, one specialty may assume that key aspects of care are being provided elsewhere, which can lead to important components of care being overlooked. People with diabetes and end-stage renal failure require improved delivery of care to overcome organizational difficulties and barriers to communication between healthcare teams. No comprehensive guidance on the management of this population has previously been produced. These national guidelines, the first in this area, bring together in one document the disparate needs of people with diabetes on maintenance haemodialysis. The guidelines are based on the best available evidence, or on expert opinion where there is no clear evidence to inform practice. We aim to provide clear advice to clinicians caring for this vulnerable population and to encourage and improve education for clinicians and people with diabetes to promote empowerment and self-management.

Prevalence of active Charcot disease in the East Midlands of England.

AIMS: To undertake a prospective point prevalence study of the prevalence of active Charcot neuro-inflammatory osteoarthropathy (Charcot disease) in a circumscribed part of England and to audit the time elapsing between disease onset and first diagnosis. METHODS: The prevalence of active Charcot disease of the foot during a single month was assessed by specialist foot care teams at seven secondary care services in the East Midlands region of England. RESULTS: A total of 90 cases were identified, representing 4.3 per 10 000 of the 205 033 total diabetes population of the region. The time elapsed from first presentation to any healthcare professional until diagnosis was also assessed. While the diagnosis was suspected or confirmed in one-third of patients within 2 weeks, it was not made for 2 months or more in 23 patients (24%). CONCLUSIONS: Non-specialist professionals should have greater awareness of the existence of this uncommon complication of diabetes in the hope that earlier diagnosis will lead to lesser degrees of deformity.

New horizons in the understanding of the causes and management of diabetic foot disease: report from the 2017 Diabetes UK Annual Professional Conference Symposium.

Diabetes-related foot disease remains a common problem. For wounds, classic teaching recommends the treatment of any infection, offloading the wound and ensuring a good blood supply, as well as ensuring that the other modifiable risk factors are addressed and optimized. There remain, however, several questions about these and other aspects of the care of diabetes-related foot disease. Some of these questions are addressed in the present report; in particular, the impact of newer technologies in the identification of any organisms present in a wound, as well as the use of novel approaches to treat infections. The use of new remote sensing technology to identify people at risk of developing foot ulceration is also considered, in an attempt to allow early intervention and prevention of foot ulcers. The psychological impact of foot disease is often overlooked, but with an increasing number of publications on the subject, the cause-and-effect role that psychology plays in foot disease, such as ulcers and Charcot neuroarthropathy, is considered. Finally, because of heterogeneity in diabetic foot studies, comparing results is difficult. A recently published document focusing on ensuring a standardized way of reporting foot disease trials is discussed.

Effectiveness of interventions to enhance healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes: a systematic review.

The outcome of management of diabetic foot ulcers remains a challenge, and there remains continuing uncertainty concerning optimal approaches to management. It is for these reasons that in 2008 and 2012, the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) working group on wound healing published systematic reviews of the evidence to inform protocols for routine care and to highlight areas, which should be considered for further study. The same working group has now updated this review by considering papers on the interventions to improve the healing of chronic ulcers published between June 2010 and June 2014. Methodological quality of selected studies was independently assessed by two reviewers using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Selected studies fell into the following ten categories: sharp debridement and wound bed preparation with larvae or hydrotherapy; wound bed preparation using antiseptics, applications and dressing products; resection of the chronic wound; oxygen and other gases, compression or negative pressure therapy; products designed to correct aspects of wound biochemistry and cell biology associated with impaired wound healing; application of cells, including platelets and stem cells; bioengineered skin and skin grafts; electrical, electromagnetic, lasers, shockwaves and ultrasound and other systemic therapies, which did not fit in the aforementioned categories. Heterogeneity of studies prevented pooled analysis of results. Of the 2161 papers identified, 30 were selected for grading following full text review. The present report is an update of the earlier IWGDF systematic reviews, and the conclusion is similar: that with the possible exception of negative pressure wound therapy in post-operative wounds, there is little published evidence to justify the use of newer therapies. Analysis of the evidence continues to present difficulties in this field as controlled studies remain few and the majority continue to be of poor methodological quality.

Use of HSI to measure oxygen saturation in the lower limb and its correlation with healing of foot ulcers in diabetes.

AIM: To explore the use of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) to predict healing of diabetic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. METHODS: We used a HSI technique that incorporated novel software to account for tissue scattering of light, and was validated using blood samples of varying oxygen saturation assessed by blood gas analysis. HSI was then performed on a population newly presenting with diabetic foot ulcers to a specialist clinic, and associations were sought with healing at 12 and 24 weeks. RESULTS: The correlation between the results of HSI and blood gas analysis was strong (r = 0.994). A total of 43 patients (mean ± sd age 62.7 ± 12.2 years; 31 men, 12 women; 37 with Type 2 diabetes, six with Type 1 diabetes) with foot ulcers were included in the prospective clinical study and underwent HSI within 16 days of presentation. In all, 26 ulcers healed within 12 weeks and 28 within 24 weeks. There was a negative association between tissue oxygenation assessed by HSI at baseline and healing by 12 weeks (P = 0.009), and this was observed in both infected and non-infected ulcers. There was a significant positive correlation between oxygenation assessed by HSI and time to healing (P = 0.03). No correlations were observed at 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that HSI may predict healing in routine practice. The fact that the correlation between HSI and healing was negative could be explained by HSI being a measure of oxygenation of haemoglobin and there may be an inverse relationship between this and the oxygenation of extravascular tissue in people with neuropathy and/or microvascular disease.

Chronic kidney disease and the foot in diabetes--is inflammation the missing link?

Diabetes is commonly complicated by the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Equally prevalent is the development of diabetic foot disease and it is now recognised that there is a higher risk of the development of foot disease and major amputation in those patients with CKD. This is particularly marked in those patients with end-stage kidney disease receiving renal replacement therapy for which there are many possible mechanisms, including the effect of dialysis on tissue hypoxia. What has been recognised recently is that the risk of the development of foot disease appears to start prior to the onset of renal replacement therapy. Whilst this may be due to the fact that the emphasis of care shifts towards the requirements of the patients' renal disease, here we discuss the possibility that the presence of a foot ulcer itself may contribute to the development or progression of CKD through repeated episodes of sepsis or chronic inflammation, or both.

Clinical evaluation of a new device in the assessment of peripheral sensory neuropathy in diabetes.

AIMS: Current National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines state that patients with diabetes should have annual examination of their feet to exclude signs of sensory impairment. The VibraTip is a new disposable device producing a vibratory stimulus, which has been developed in order to screen for peripheral sensory neuropathy in diabetes. This study was designed to evaluate the device by assessing intra-rater reliability and comparing the ability of the VibraTip to detect or exclude peripheral sensory neuropathy with other bedside methods. METHODS: One hundred and forty-one patients with diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2) were examined for diabetic peripheral sensory neuropathy using a Neurothesiometer, 10-g monofilament, a 128-Hz tuning fork, a Neurotip™ and a VibraTip. The failure to perceive the Neurosthesiometer stimulus at ≥ 25 V in either foot was considered the reference method for the presence of peripheral sensory neuropathy. Receiver operating characteristic curves were produced for each device and the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios for the diagnosis of peripheral sensory neuropathy were calculated. Repeat testing with the VibraTip was performed in 18 patients and intra-rater reliability assessed using Cronbach alpha. RESULTS: Analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the 10-g monofilament was significantly better than the 128-Hz tuning fork (P = 0.0056) and the Neurotip (P = 0.0022), but was no different from the VibraTip (P = 0.3214). The alpha coefficient for the VibraTip was calculated to be 0.882, indicating good reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The VibraTip is a device comparable with the 10-g monofilament and therefore could be considered a useful tool for screening for peripheral sensory neuropathy in diabetes.

Recurrence of the acute Charcot foot in diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The acute Charcot foot is thought to occur in people who have a number of predisposing factors, of which distal neuropathy is the most important. But while occurrence in the contralateral foot is not infrequent, recurrence in the same foot seems to be very rare. CASE REPORT: A case is described in which discrete episodes of inflammation of the midfoot occurred in the same foot over a period of 14 years, and were attributed to acute Charcot neuroarthropathy (Charcot foot). There was coincidental evidence of osteomyelitis of the 4(th) toe but there was no suspicion that the inflammatory episodes of the midfoot were the result of bone infection and they settled without treatment with antibiotics. CONCLUSION: This case had clinically diagnosed recurrences of inflammation and destruction typical of the acute Charcot foot over an extended period, and this is most unusual. The implications of the rarity of such recurrences are discussed.

A systematic review of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes.

The outcome of management of diabetic foot ulcers is poor, and there is continuing uncertainty concerning optimal approaches to management. It was for these reasons that in 2006 the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) working group on wound healing undertook a systematic review of the evidence to inform protocols for routine care and to highlight areas which should be considered for further study. The same working group has now updated this review by considering papers on the interventions to improve the healing of chronic ulcers published between December 2006 and June 2010. Methodological quality of selected studies was independently assessed by two reviewers using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Selected studies fell into the following ten categories: sharp debridement and wound bed preparation with larvae and hydrotherapy; wound bed preparation using antiseptics, applications and dressing products; resection of the chronic wound; hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT); compression or negative pressure therapy; products designed to correct aspects of wound biochemistry and cell biology associated with impaired wound healing; application of cells, including platelets and stem cells; bioengineered skin and skin grafts; electrical, electromagnetic, lasers, shockwaves and ultrasound; other systemic therapies which did not fit in the above categories. Heterogeneity of studies prevented pooled analysis of results. Of the 1322 papers identified, 43 were selected for grading following full text review. The present report is an update of the earlier IWGDF systematic review, but the conclusion is similar: that with the exception of HBOT and, possibly, negative pressure wound therapy, there is little published evidence to justify the use of newer therapies. This echoes the conclusion of a recent Cochrane review and the systematic review undertaken by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Guidelines Committee in the UK. Analysis of evidence presents considerable difficulties in this field particularly as controlled studies are few and the majority are of poor methodological quality.

Audit of acute Charcot's disease in the UK: the CDUK study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We studied factors associated with the development and resolution of acute Charcot foot using a web-based observational study. METHODS: Clinicians managing cases of acute Charcot foot in the UK and Ireland between June 2005 and February 2007 were invited to register anonymised details on a secure website. RESULTS: A total of 288 cases (age 57.0 ± 11.3 years [mean ± SD]; 71.2% male) were registered from 76 centres. Of these, 36% of patients recalled an episode of relevant trauma in the preceding 6 months, while 12% had had surgery to the affected foot. In 101 (35%) cases, ulceration was present at registration and 20% of these had osteomyelitis. Non-removable off-loading devices were used at presentation in 35.4% of cases, with removable off-loading used in 50%. Data on resolution were available for 219 patients. The median time to resolution was 9 months in patients whose initial management included the use of non-removable off-loading, compared with 12 months in the remainder (p = 0.001). Bisphosphonates were administered intravenously in 25.4% and orally in 19.4% of cases. The median time to resolution in patients who received bisphosphonates was 12 months and was longer than in those who did not (10 months, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The median time to resolution was longer than in earlier series. Although limited by being observational and non-randomised, these data suggest that the use of non-removable off-loading at presentation may shorten the time to resolution. They provide no evidence to indicate that the use of bisphosphonates is beneficial.

Foot care education in patients with diabetes at low risk of complications: a consensus statement.

AIMS: To define and agree a practical educational framework for delivery by all healthcare professionals managing patients with diabetes, particularly those at low risk of developing foot complications. METHODS: A consensus meeting of a multidisciplinary expert panel. Prior to the meeting, relevant clinical papers were disseminated to the panel for review. The consensus was largely based upon the experts' clinical experience and judgement. RESULTS: Four main health behaviours were identified for those at low risk of developing foot complications, namely: control of blood glucose levels; attendance at annual foot screening examination; reporting of any changes in foot health immediately; and the engagement in a simple daily foot care routine. CONCLUSION: There is currently little evidence-based literature to support specific foot care practices. Patients with diabetes at low risk of developing complications should be encouraged to undertake a basic foot care regimen to reduce their likelihood of developing complications.

Randomised controlled trial of the use of three dressing preparations in the management of chronic ulceration of the foot in diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three dressing products, N-A, Inadine and Aquacel, for patients with diabetic foot ulcers, as well as the feasibility and consequences of less frequent dressing changes by health-care professionals. DESIGN: A multicentre, prospective, observer-blinded, parallel group, randomised controlled trial, with three arms. SETTING: Established expert multidisciplinary clinics for the management of diabetic foot ulcers across the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients over age 18 with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with a chronic (present for at least 6 weeks) full-thickness foot ulcer (on or below the malleoli) not penetrating to tendon, periosteum or bone, and with a cross-sectional area between 25 and 2500 mm(2). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised 1:1:1 to treatment with one of N-A (a non-adherent, knitted, viscose filament gauze), Inadine (an iodine-impregnated dressing), both traditional dressings, or Aquacel, a newer product. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the number of ulcers healed in each group at week 24. Secondary measures included time to healing, new ulcerations, major and minor amputations, and episodes of secondary infection. RESULTS: A total of 317 patients were randomised. After 88 withdrawals, 229 remained evaluable. A greater proportion of smaller (25-100 mm(2) ulcers healed within the specified time (48.3% versus 37.3%; p = 0.048). There was, however, no difference between the three dressings in terms of percentage healed by 24 weeks, or in the mean time to healing, whether analysed on the basis of intention to treat (Inadine 44.4%, N-A 38.7%, Aquacel 44.7%; not significant) or per protocol (Inadine 55.2%, N-A 59.4%, Aquacel 63.0%; not significant). There was no difference in the quality of healing, as reflected in the incidence of recurrence within 12 weeks. Likewise, there was no difference in the incidence of adverse events, although a greater proportion of those randomised to the non-adherent dressings were withdrawn from the study (34.9% versus 29.1% Aquacel and 19.4% Inadine; p = 0.038). The only statistically significant difference found in the health economic analysis was the cost associated with the provision of dressings (mean cost per patient: N-A 14.85 pounds, Inadine 17.48 pounds, Aquacel 43.60 pounds). The higher cost of Aquacel was not offset by the fewer dressings required. There was no difference in measures of either generic or condition-specific measures of quality of life. However, there was a significant difference in the change in pain associated with dressing changes between the first and second visits, with least pain reported by those receiving non-adherent dressings (p = 0.012). There was no difference in the costs of professional time, and this may relate to the number of dressing changes undertaken by non-professionals. Fifty-one per cent of all participants had at least one dressing change undertaken by themselves or a non-professional carer, although this ranged from 22% to 82% between the different centres. CONCLUSIONS: As there was no difference in effectiveness, there is no reason why the least costly of the three dressings could not be used more widely across the UK National Health Service, thus generating potentially substantial savings. The option of involving patients and non-professional carers in changing dressings needs to be assessed more formally and could be associated with further significant reductions in health-care costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN78366977.

Medial arterial calcification in diabetes and its relationship to neuropathy.

Calcification of the media of arterial walls is common in diabetes and is particularly associated with distal symmetrical neuropathy. Arterial calcification also complicates chronic kidney disease and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The term calcification is not strictly accurate because the morphological changes incorporate those of new bone formation, i.e. ossification. The processes are complex, but are closely related to those involved in bone homeostasis, and it is relevant that calcification of the arterial wall and osteopenia often co-exist. One particular factor linked to the development of arterial calcification is distal symmetrical neuropathy; indeed, it has been suggested that neuropathy explains the distal distribution of arterial calcification in diabetes. It has also been suggested that the link with neuropathy results from loss of neuropeptides, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide, which are inherently protective. The association between distal symmetrical neuropathy and calcification of the arterial wall highlights the fact that neuropathy may be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular mortality.

Education for secondary prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This observer-blind, randomised controlled trial was designed to determine the effect of a foot care education programme in the secondary prevention of foot ulcers. METHODS: People with newly healed foot ulcers attending one of three specialist clinics were allocated to receive either targeted, one-to-one education or usual care, using a computer-generated random allocation sequence that had been prepared in advance but which was concealed from the clinical researcher. The primary outcome was ulcer incidence at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were ulcer incidence at 6 months and incidence of amputation, mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and quality of life (Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale) at 6 and 12 months. Protective foot care behaviours (Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare) were assessed at 12 months. RESULTS: There were 87 (mean [SD] age 63.5 [12.1] years) patients in the intervention group and 85 control patients (mean [SD] age 64.9 [10.9] years). The groups were comparable at baseline. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between groups in ulcer incidence at either 6 months (intervention 30%, control 21%) or 12 months (intervention 41%, control 41%). Recommended foot care behaviours at 12 months were better in the intervention than in the control group (p = 0.03), but education had no significant (p > 0.05) effect on mood, quality of life or amputations. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Even though the intervention was associated with improved foot care behaviour, there was no evidence that this programme of targeted education was associated with clinical benefit in this population when compared with usual care. The usefulness and optimal delivery of education to such a high-risk group requires further evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00729456 FUNDING: Diabetes UK project grant RD02/0002535.