RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The calcification sign assessed by computed tomography appears to be a potential marker for benignities among patients diagnosed with pulmonary nodules (PNs). The following meta-analysis has been purposefully designed to figure-out the diagnostic value of the calcification signature as a way of identifying benignities from PNs. METHODS: Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed were considered as a reference to obtain the required data from January 2000 until October 2020. Stata v12.0 was used as a standard tool for statistical assessment. RESULTS: Eleven retrospective studies were assessed via this meta-analysis, which included 6136 PNs (1827 benign and 4309 malignant). The pooled diagnostic odd ratios, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), sensitivity and specificity were 6.79, 6.06, 0.89, 13% and 98%, respectively. The value obtained for the area under the curve was 0.65, showing moderate overall diagnostic accuracy. A significant heterogeneity was found while calculating the pooled sensitivity (I2 = 85.5%), specificity (I2 = 75.0%), PLR (I2 = 59.0%), NLR (I2 = 79.5%) and DOR (I2 = 100.0%) in the current analysis. Sub-group analyses presented better PLR and specificity values for the study with a sample size ≥ 400. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test detected no potential evidence of significant publication bias (p = 0.091). CONCLUSIONS: Calcification signs have been identified as moderate regulators corresponding to overall diagnostic performance (via marking a distinct differentiation between malignant and benign) for PNs. However, the manifestation of the calcification sign had a good directive property for benign PNs.