Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 37: 7-13, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28235533

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Pain after total knee replacement (TKR) interferes with early rehabilitation. Although the use of epidural bupivacaine in post-TKR patients is associated with effective analgesia, the associated motor blockade effect delays functional recovery. We compared analgesic efficacy and side effects of postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with plain ropivacaine 0.1% with/without fentanyl 2.5 µg/mL vs plain bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2.5 µg/mL in patients undergoing bilateral TKR. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized study. SETTINGS: Operation room, postoperative recovery room, and intensive joint replacement unit. PATIENTS: Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists I to II post-TKR patients who were randomly allocated to receive postoperative PCEA with plain ropivacaine 0.1% (group 1), ropivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 2.5 µg/mL (group 2), and plain bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2.5 µg/mL (group 3). INTERVENTION: Postoperatively, the PCEA settings were standardized for a basal flow of 4 mL/h, demand dose of 6 mL, and lock-out interval of 20 minutes. "Rescue" analgesia included epidural boluses (6 mL) of respective study drug over and above PCEA administration. MEASUREMENTS: Postoperative pain profile, total PCEA drug used, heart rate, and noninvasive blood pressure, side effects, and patient satisfaction were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Demographic parameters, duration of surgery, and hemodynamic variables (heart rate and noninvasive blood pressure) were comparable for the 3 study groups. Pain scores and rescue drug requirements were greater in "ropivacaine-only" group. Motor blockade was greatest in "bupivacaine-fentanyl" group. Postoperatively, despite the presence of minor side effects (nausea, itching) in the "ropivacaine-fentanyl" and bupivacaine-fentanyl groups, the patients belonging to these groups were more satisfied. CONCLUSION: After bilateral TKR, ropivacaine-fentanyl combination administered through a PCEA system resulted in "superior" analgesic efficacy, that is, pain relief without motor blockade, than "ropivacaine alone" (lesser pain relief) and bupivacaine-fentanyl (pain relief but with attendant motor blockade). Overall, the addition of fentanyl to epidural local anesthetic returned favorable postoperative analgesia profile and patient satisfaction with minor incidence of opioid-related side effects.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Idoso , Amidas/administração & dosagem , Amidas/efeitos adversos , Analgesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Fentanila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Náusea/epidemiologia , Osteoartrite/cirurgia , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Ropivacaina , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA