Clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate visual, refractive and safety outcomes in eyes after they underwent phacoemulsification and implantation of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. METHODS: This was a single center observational study conducted at Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. Patients were included if they had cataract extraction with in-the-bag implantation of the EyeCee® One preloaded intraocular lens from August to October 2019. Pre-operative, surgery-related and 2 weeks and 3 months post-operative data was collected. Surgeons at this trust were then asked to complete a feedback form to evaluate their experience of implanting the EyeCee® One. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two eyes were included in the study. Ninety-four (62%) of these eyes had cataract but no concomitant ocular pathology that could potentially affect visual acuity. Three months post-operatively, 98.7% of all eyes had monocular CDVA ≤0.3 logMAR. 100% of the eyes without concomitant ocular pathology achieved this target. The mean CDVA of all eyes in this study improved from 0.43 ± 0.43 logMAR pre-operatively, to 0.05 ± 0.11 logMAR post-operatively (p < 0.05). The mean sphere and spherical equivalent values showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) and (p < 0.05). There were no intraoperative complications and 1.3% of patients reported complications 2 weeks post-operatively. All of the participating surgeons said they would use the EyeCee® One again with 64% providing an overall rating of 'excellent' for their experience of implanting this intraocular lens. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates excellent post-operative visual acuity and refractive outcomes in eyes after EyeCee® One implantation. This is accompanied with very little risk of intraoperative and post-operative complications.

Restarting cataract surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic; a prospective study analysing 30 day outcomes after elective cataract surgery in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Cataract is a significant cause of preventable blindness in the United Kingdom and worldwide. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, cataract surgery was the most commonly performed operation by the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of elective cataract surgery performed in the United Kingdom in a COVID-19 free hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Single centre prospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective cataract surgery in the United Kingdom over a 3 month period from May to August 2020. Electronic medical records were reviewed and patients were contacted at 30 days post-operatively. Data collection included symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection, hospital admission, mortality, intra-operative and post-operative surgical complications. RESULTS: A total of 649 elective cataract surgeries were performed. Two patients (0.3%) developed worsening dyspnoea during the 30 day post-operative period, but tested negative for COVID-19 infection. Three patients (0.5%) were hospitalised, unrelated to COVID-19 infection, of which one patient (0.2%) passed. Four patients (0.6%) suffered posterior capsular rupture. 601 (93.2%) had no post-operative complications. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a safe model for the resumption of elective cataract surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing strict infection control measures are in place.

Refractive surprise after cataract surgery secondary to smeared optics of swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Inaccurate biometry can lead to the wrong intraocular lens implantation and result in refractive surprise following cataract surgery. It is important to be sceptical of biometry results that do not match the refractive or clinical picture and ask for it to be repeated. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a unique cause of refractive surprise in a patient undergoing cataract surgery. Pre-operative refraction demonstrated hypermetropia, yet swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometry repeatedly calculated the axial length as > 35.00 mm in both eyes. The patient underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens insertion using the provided biometry calculations, however post-operatively the patient had a + 14.00 dioptre refractive surprise. Analysis of biometry performed on the same day identified other patients with exaggerated axial lengths, supporting the theory that the biometer's smeared optical surface was responsible. Following servicing of the machine, repeat biometry of the patient calculated the axial length consistent with a hypermetrope (21.67 mm) and the intraocular lens exchange was successful in correcting the refractive error. CONCLUSIONS: Ensure the optical surfaces of the biometer are cleaned regularly, and consider repeating biometry on separate days if repeat biometry still is not in keeping with the refractive or clinical picture. Additionally, re-confirm the axial length with another modality.

Comparing capsular bag performance of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic intraocular lens: A randomised two-centre study.

PURPOSE:: To evaluate the capsular bag performance and posterior capsule opacification development of two intraocular lenses differing in material and design. METHODS:: This study included patients who were scheduled for cataract surgery and compared a hydrophilic intraocular lens (Super flex® intraocular lens; Rayner Surgical, Worthing, UK) with a hydrophobic intraocular lens (AcrySof® SA60AT; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA). Follow-ups were performed 1 month and 2 years after cataract surgery, including a slit lamp examination and retroillumination images. RESULTS:: In total, 80 eyes of 80 patients were recruited. At the 1-month follow-up, 6 of 39 cases had a gap between the posterior lens capsule and intraocular lens (1 case in the hydrophilic intraocular lens group and 5 cases in the hydrophobic intraocular lens group; p = 0.348). Objective and subjective posterior capsule opacification scoring showed no statistically significant difference between both groups (p = 0.123). CONCLUSION:: Both intraocular lens showed a good capsular bag performance and a relatively low posterior capsule opacification development within the first 2 years after surgery.

Multifocal toric intraocular lenses versus multifocal intraocular lenses combined with peripheral corneal relaxing incisions to correct moderate astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of multifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and standard nontoric multifocal IOL implantation combined with peripheral corneal relaxing incisions (PCRIs) in patients with moderate preexisting corneal astigmatism. SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Patients with visually significant cataract in both eyes who desired spectacle independence and had corneal astigmatism (1.00 to 2.50 diopters [D]) had multifocal toric IOL implantation in 1 eye and a nontoric multifocal IOL combined with PCRIs (Donnenfeld nomogram) in the contralateral eye. Outcome measures were visual acuity, astigmatic vector reduction, digital toric IOL axis determination, spectacle need, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled. Three months postoperatively, the mean residual refractive astigmatism was 0.45 D ± 0.49 (SD) in the toric IOL group and 0.72 ± 0.61 D in the PCRI group. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.10 ± 0.14 in the toric IOL group and 0.15 ± 0.14 in the PCRI group and the mean uncorrected near visual acuity, 0.43 ± 0.11 and 0.39 ± 0.10, respectively. The mean absolute misalignment from the intended axis was 2.52 ± 1.97 degrees. The rotation was within ±3 degrees in 90.9% of all cases and within ±6 degrees in all cases. On the questionnaire, 52.9% of all patients said they required spectacles only when reading for a long time. CONCLUSION: Although refractive astigmatism decreased in both groups, multifocal toric IOL implantation was predictable with good rotational stability. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Comparison of methods to quantify posterior capsule opacification using forward and backward light scattering.

PURPOSE: To compare forward and backward light scattering measurements to quantify posterior capsule opacification (PCO). SETTING: Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, Vienna, Austria. DESIGN: Prospective single-center study. METHODS: This observational study comprised consecutive patients scheduled for neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy for regeneratory PCO. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts and the contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic conditions using Pelli-Robson charts were assessed before an Nd:YAG capsulotomy was performed. Retroillumination images, rotating Scheimpflug scans (Pentacam HR), and straylight meter (C-Quant) and point-spread function (PSF) meter (Optical Quality Analysis System) measurements were performed before and after Nd:YAG capsulotomy. RESULTS: The study enrolled 50 eyes of 50 patients. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity and CDVA were 0.76 logMAR ± 0.18 (SD) and 0.68 ± 0.2 logMAR, respectively. The mean log contrast sensitivity (logCS) was 1.2 ± 0.15 logCS under photopic conditions and 1.05 ± 0.15 logCS under mesopic conditions. There was a moderate correlation between the Scheimpflug score and the Automated Quantification of After-Cataract score (r(2) = 0.37, P=.03). Furthermore, a moderate and close to significant correlation between the PSF meter and the straylight meter was observed (r(2) = 0.32; P=.07). CONCLUSION: Each of the 4 devices assesses different aspects of a patient's quality of vision. Further developments should focus on methods that measure forward scatter of light in a large visual angle and are not too patient or examiner dependent.

Correction of moderate corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery: toric intraocular lens versus peripheral corneal relaxing incisions.

PURPOSE: To compare the astigmatism-reducing effect of a toric intraocular lens (IOL) and peripheral corneal relaxing incisions (PCRIs). SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective masked bilateral randomized study. METHODS: Cataract patients with a preoperative corneal astigmatism of 1.0 to 2.5 diopters (D) were included. All patients received a toric IOL in 1 eye and a nontoric IOL plus a PCRI in the other eye. Postoperative follow-up was at 1 hour, 1 month, and 6 months. The uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, autorefraction (Topcon RM-8800), and subjective refraction were recorded. The IOL axis was assessed using retroillumination photographs. RESULTS: The study enrolled 60 eyes of 30 patients. The mean astigmatism vector reduction was 1.74 D ± 0.64 (SD) in the toric IOL group and 1.27 ± 0.76 D in the PCRI group; the difference was statistically significant (P=.042). The mean absolute rotation of the toric IOL was 2.5 ± 1.8 degrees (maximum 6.3 degrees) in the first 6 postoperative months. Astigmatism increased in the PCRI group between the 1-month and 6-month follow-up (mean 0.38 ± 0.27 D; maximum 1.00 D) (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Toric IOLs and PCRIs both reduced astigmatism; however, toric IOLs reduced astigmatism to a higher extent and they were more predictable.

Capsular bag stability and posterior capsule opacification of a plate-haptic design microincision cataract surgery intraocular lens: 3-year results of a randomised trial.

PURPOSE: To compare capsular bag stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) of a plate-haptic intraocular lens (IOL) and a standard three-piece open-loop-haptic IOL of the same acrylic material. METHODS: In this randomised bilateral patient-masked and examiner-masked study, each patient received a microincision cataract surgery IOL (MICS IOL; Acri.Smart 46S=CT SHERIS 209M) in one eye and a small incision cataract surgery IOL (SICS IOL; AcriLyc 53N = CT 53N, both Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) as a control in the contralateral eye. Follow-up examinations were performed 1 h, 1 week, 1 month, 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured and retroillumination images were performed at all postoperative follow-ups. Furthermore, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, autorefraction and subjective refraction were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 50 eyes of 25 patients were included. The ACD difference between the MICS IOL and the SICS IOL was not significant at any time point (p>0.05). Distance-corrected visual acuity at the 3-year follow-up was similar and not significantly different between the groups (p=0.48). Mean AQUA score in the MICS IOL group and in the SICS IOL group at the 3-year follow-up was 2.3 (SD ±2.3) and 2.1 (SD ±2.2), respectively (p=0.79). CONCLUSIONS: The investigated hydrophilic acrylic plate-haptic MICS IOL with a hydrophobic surface showed comparable results concerning capsular bag stability and PCO rates up to 3 years compared with a SICS IOL of the same material.

Effect of fluorescein dye staining of the tear film on Scheimpflug measurements of central corneal thickness.

PURPOSE: To assess whether fluorescein dye in the tear film results in a clinically relevant change in central corneal thickness (CCT), as measured with Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). The study was conducted at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center study on healthy volunteers, CCT was measured using rotating Scheimpflug imaging and partial coherence interferometry technique. After 3 baseline measurements of both eyes, a drop of 0.25% fluorescein with 0.5% proxymetacaine hydrochloride dye, as used for measuring intraocular pressure with applanation Goldmann tonometry, was instilled in the first eye and measurements were repeated after 1 minute and 5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 minutes. A fluorescein drop was then instilled in the second eye, and 1 measurement was performed after 1 minute. Immediately afterwards, the second eye was rinsed with 2 ml of balanced saline solution and the CCT measurement was repeated. On a different day, a Schirmer II test was performed. RESULTS: Thirty eyes of 15 volunteers were included in this study. The average CCT measured with Scheimpflug imaging was 539.1 µm (SD, 32.2 µm), and after instilling fluorescein, CCT values increased by 46.6 µm (SD, 11.4 µm; P < 0.01, paired t test). In 10 of 15 subjects, the fluorescein layer was still present 40 minutes after instilling the drop. Rinsing the eye decreased the fluorescein layer by 49.6% and a value of 24.8 µm (SD, 16.8 µm). CONCLUSIONS: Because CCT measurements are critical for corneal refractive surgery, Scheimpflug imaging should not be performed after use of fluorescein dye for staining of the corneal epithelium or for applanation tonometry.

A prospective study comparing EndoGlide and Busin glide insertion techniques in descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare a new insertion method using an EndoGlide (Angiotech/Network Medical Products) with the standard Busin glide (Moria USA) assisted insertion of the posterior lamellar corneal graft in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive, comparative, nonrandomized study. METHODS: Surgery was performed between October 2008 and October 2010 in 52 eyes of 52 consecutive patients with endothelial dysfunction suitable for DSEK. Twenty-two consecutive eyes underwent the new EndoGlide-assisted insertion of donor lenticule and 30 eyes underwent the surgery using the Busin glide. Six-month follow-up data are available for all patients. Clinical details, best-corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and corneal endothelial cell loss were assessed at 6 months after DSEK. RESULTS: At 6 months after surgery, the best-corrected visual acuity was similar in both groups (0.13 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the EndoGlide eyes as compared with 0.15 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the Busin group; P = .34). Mean spherical equivalent was 0.65 diopter (D) and 0.51 D, and mean refractory cylinder was 1.39 D and 1.08 D, respectively (P = .40). The endothelial cell loss was much lower in the EndoGlide group (25.76%) as compared with the Busin group (47.46%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the new EndoGlide results in significantly less endothelial cell loss than Busin glide donor insertion in DSEK. The visual outcomes and refractive changes were similar in both groups.

Posterior capsule opacification and capsular bag performance of a microincision intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To assess the axial stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO)-inhibiting efficacy of a microincision hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOL) (Idea 613 XC) and a standard hydrophobic open-loop acrylic IOL (Acrysof SA60AT). SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with bilateral cataract received a microincision cataract surgery (MICS) IOL in 1 eye and a small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) IOL in the contralateral eye. Follow-up examinations were performed immediately after surgery and postoperatively at 1 week and 3 and 24 months. Posterior capsule opacification was assessed using retroillumination photography. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured using partial coherence laser interferometry, and IOL tilt and decentration were measured using a Purkinje meter. RESULTS: Seventy eyes (35 patients) were enrolled. The mean ACD at 3 months was 4.91 mm ± 0.26 (SD) in the MICS group and 4.60 ± 0.23 mm in the SICS group. The anterior IOL shift over the first 3 months was slightly smaller with the MICS IOL (81 µm) than with the SICS IOL (254 µm). The mean ACD was 0.377 ± 178 µm deeper with the MICS IOL (P<.01, paired t test). Two years postoperatively, the amount of regeneratory PCO was higher with the MICS IOL than with the SICS IOL (image analysis software score 2.6 versus 1.9; P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: Two years after surgery, the PCO rate was slightly higher with the MICS IOL. The 2 IOLs had similar performance in terms of axial stability, decentration, and tilt. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.

Impact of intraocular lens haptic design and orientation on decentration and tilt.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of intraocular lens (IOL) orientation (vertical versus horizontal) and haptic design (1-piece versus 3-piece) on centration and tilt using a Purkinje meter. SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Randomized pilot study with intrapatient comparison. METHODS: In part 1 of this study, patients received plate-haptic IOLs (Akreos Adapt) in both eyes that were positioned vertically in 1 eye and horizontally in the other eye. In part 2, patients received a 1-piece IOL (Acrysof SA60AT) in 1 eye and a 3-piece IOL (Acrysof MA60AC) in the contralateral eye. Decentration and tilt were measured 1 month and 3 months postoperatively with a new Purkinje meter. RESULTS: In part 1 (n = 15), the mean decentration of plate-haptic IOLs was 0.4 mm ± 0.2 (SD) with vertical orientation and 0.4 ± 0.2 mm with horizontal orientation and the mean tilt, 1.5 ± 1.1 degrees and 2.9 ± 0.9 degrees, respectively. In part 2 (n = 15), the mean decentration was 0.4 ± 0.3 mm with 1-piece IOLs and 0.6 ± 0.8 mm with 3-piece IOLs and the mean tilt, 2.2 ± 7.2 degrees and 5.3 ± 2.4 degrees, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Three-piece IOLs had a greater tendency toward more decentration than 1-piece IOLs, perhaps because of slight deformation of 1 or both haptics during implantation or inaccuracies in production when the haptics are manually placed into the optic. The IOL orientation for plate-haptic IOLs appeared to have no effect on IOL position. The Purkinje meter was useful in assessing the capsule bag performance of the IOLs. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.

Rotational stability of a single-piece toric acrylic intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To assess the rotational stability of a single-piece toric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) during the first 6 postoperative months. SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHOD: Eyes with age-related cataract and corneal astigmatism (1.00 to 3.00 D diopter [D]) were measured by partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster). Preoperatively, the horizontal axis was marked. Surgical technique included a standardized temporal clear corneal incision, phacoemulsification, and in-the-bag implantation of a toric IOL (AcrySof SN60TT). Rotational stability of the IOL was assessed using retroillumination photographs postoperatively at 1 hour and at 1 and 6 months. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuities, residual refractive error, and keratometric and refractive cylinders were measured. RESULTS: The study enrolled 30 eyes (30 patients). The mean absolute IOL rotation was 2.44 degrees ± 1.84 (SD) at 1 month and 2.66 ± 1.99 degrees at 6 months. The photographic technique had high reproducibility of axis measurement, with consecutive measurements varying by less than 2.0 degrees. The mean UDVA was 0.16 logMAR (range 0.42 to -0.18 logMAR) at 1 month and 0.20 logMAR (range 0.60 to -0.20 logMAR) at 6 months. The residual refractive cylinder by autorefraction was -0.84 D (range -2.00 to 0.00 D) and -0.80 D (range -1.75 to 0.00 D), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The acrylic toric IOL was rotationally stable within the first 6 months postoperatively. The photographic and axis analysis method to evaluate stability had high reproducibility and detected small changes in rotation.

Reproducibility of intraocular lens decentration and tilt measurement using a clinical Purkinje meter.

PURPOSE: To determine the reproducibility of intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt measurements with a new Purkinje meter instrument. SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: After pupil dilation, images of pseudophakic eyes with a plate-style IOL (Akreos Adapt) were obtained using a recently developed Purkinje meter. Intraocular lens decentration and tilt were evaluated by analyzing the captured images using a semiobjective method by marking the reflexes in the images and automatic calculation using a dedicated software program. In study 1, examiner 1 examined the eyes first followed by examiner 2. Ten minutes later, examiner 1 performed a second measurement, after which the intraexaminer and interexaminer reproducibility were determined. In study 2, a Purkinje meter was used to measure pseudophakic eyes with slitlamp finding of clinical IOL decentration, IOL tilt, or both. The results were compared with retroillumination photographs and slitlamp findings. RESULTS: In study 1, there was high intraexaminer reproducibility for decentration (r = 0.95) and tilt (r = 0.85) and high interexaminer reproducibility for decentration (r = 0.84) and tilt (r = 0.75). In study 2, even in extreme cases of decentration and/or tilt, the Purkinje meter measurements were possible and appeared to correlate well with slitlamp findings. CONCLUSIONS: Acquisition of images in pseudophakic eyes with the Purkinje meter was simple and rapid. The method was highly reliable for 1 examiner and between 2 examiners.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis of the optic chiasm.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disease with clonal proliferation of dendritic histiocytes forming a pseudotumoral growth. LCH occurs most frequently in infancy or early childhood. It can present either as a localized self-limiting form or as a diffuse form with multisystem involvement. Herein an unusual case of LCH involving the optic chiasm is presented. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of LCH presenting with visual disturbance. The clinical, radiological and histopathological findings are discussed.