Acceptance of Telemedicine Compared to In-Person Consultation From the Providers' and Users' Perspectives: Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Dermatology.

BACKGROUND: Teledermatology is currently finding its place in modern health care worldwide as a rapidly evolving field. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptance of teledermatology compared to in-person consultation from the perspective of patients and professionals. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional pilot study was performed at secondary and tertiary referral centers of dermatology in Switzerland from August 2019 to January 2020. A customized questionnaire addressing demographics and educational data, experience with telemedicine, and presumed willingness to replace in-patient consultations with teledermatology was completed by dermatological patients, dermatologists, and health care workers in dermatology. RESULTS: Among a total of 664 participants, the ones with previous telemedicine experience (171/664, 25.8%) indicated a high level of overall experience with it (patients: 73/106, 68.9%, dermatologists: 6/8, 75.0%, and health care workers: 27/34, 79.4%). Patients, dermatologists, and health care workers were most likely willing to replace in-person consultations with teledermatology for minor health issues (353/512, 68.9%; 37/45, 82.2%; and 89/107, 83.2%, respectively). We observed a higher preference for telemedicine among individuals who have already used telemedicine (patients: P<.001, dermatologists: P=.03, and health care workers, P=.005), as well as among patients with higher educational levels (P=.003). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the preference for teledermatology has a high potential to increase over time since previous experience with telemedicine and a higher level of education were associated with a higher willingness to replace in-patient consultations with telemedicine. We assume that minor skin problems are the most promising issue in teledermatology. Our findings emphasize the need for dermatologists to be actively involved in the transition to teledermatology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04495036; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04495036.

Mucosal side effects in patients treated with topical imiquimod-A scoping review of the literature.

Imiquimod 5% is approved for topical treatment of actinic keratosis (AKs), superficial basal cell carcinoma and condylomata acuminata, the 3.75% formulation for the treatment of AKs and genital warts. Imiquimod has also been used off-label in various other skin conditions (eg, Bowen's disease, lentigo maligna, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia). As a toll-like receptor 7/8 (TLR7/8) agonist imiquimod induces a local inflammatory response by increased production of cytokines, co-stimulatory molecules, activation of Nk-cells and antigen-specific T-cells. In addition to imiquimod-associated adverse effects at non-application sites such as fever, vertigo or myalgia there have been anecdotal reports of distant inflammatory mucosal reactions-a side effect not declared in the medicinal product information. In this scoping review we collected a total of seven cases of patients with lesions of the oral mucosa and lips and summarized pathophysiological hypotheses to explain this type of side effect. The review is complemented with an illustrated report of a 87-year-old female patient of ours suffering from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who developed severe oral mucosal and labial reactions following application of imiquimod 3.75% for treatment of AKs. She denied accidental transfer of imiquimod and was tested negative for herpes simplex virus (PCR) and bacteria (culture) from lesional swabs.

Internet and social media use in dermatology patients: Search behavior and impact on patient-physician relationship.

The traditional patient-physician relationship is being changed by the patients' searches for medical information on the Internet and in social media (SM). Freely available medical information online bears enormous potential but also holds dangers. In this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, the patients' motivation, preferences and unmet needs when searching for medical information online and the impact on the patient-physician relationship were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficients, χ2 -tests and paired t-tests. Among 460 participants, 82.4% had already used the Internet/SM to gain medical information, but in only 9.4% their dermatologists had raised this topic. Online search for medical information was associated with female gender (P = .048), a higher skin-related burden (P = .020), higher level of education (P = .072), higher income (P = .019), anxiety (P = .004), and adnexal skin diseases (P = .043). For 16.1% of patients, "the Internet/SM" was their most important source of medical information; 81.4% deemed the impact of their online searches on their patient-physician relationship as neutral, 16.0% as positive, 2.6% as negative. The patients' top three unmet needs were "Online consultations", "Professional content on YouTube" and "Chat opportunities". Online search for medical information is a very important topic for most dermatology patients but it may not be adequately addressed by dermatologists. Our results indicate that from the patients`perspective such online searches do not have a significant impact on patient-physician relationship.