Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in early preterm fetal growth restriction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of computerized cardiotocography (cCTG) with calculation of fetal heart rate (FHR) short-term variability (STV) in early preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR) for prevention of fetal death and neonatal asphyxia, neonatal morbidity, and 2-year neurodevelopmental impairment. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all women who were admitted to the Amsterdam University Medical Center-AMC between 2003 and 2015 due to FGR and/or pre-eclampsia, and who were delivered by prelabor Cesarean section, or had a fetal death, before 32 weeks' gestation. STV of all available cCTG registrations during the 5 days preceding fetal death or delivery was calculated retrospectively, and FHR decelerations were classified visually as absent, 1-2/h or recurrent (> 2/h). Adverse outcome endpoints were defined as fetal death, neonatal asphyxia at birth (including fetal death), neonatal death, major neonatal morbidity and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome. A simulation analysis was performed to assess the incidence of adverse outcome using two thresholds for cCTG: (1) highly abnormal (STV < 2.6 ms before 29 weeks and < 3.0 ms thereafter, and/or recurrent FHR decelerations); and (2) moderately abnormal (STV < 3.5 ms before 29 weeks and < 4.0 ms thereafter, and/or recurrent FHR decelerations). Three management strategies were assessed using a strict schedule for the frequency of cCTG recordings: (1) cCTG without use of fetal arterial Doppler; (2) cCTG with additional fetal arterial Doppler after 29 weeks; and (3) cCTG with additional fetal arterial Doppler after 27 weeks. RESULTS: Included were 367 pregnancies (3295 cCTG recordings), of which 20 resulted in fetal death and 347 were delivered by Cesarean section before the onset of labor. Cesarean delivery was indicated by fetal condition in 94% of cases and by maternal condition in 6%. Median gestational age at delivery was 30 (interquartile range (IQR), 28-31) weeks and median birth weight was 900 (IQR, 740-1090) g. Six cases of fetal death were not anticipated by standard practice using visual assessment of CTG. A last highly abnormal cCTG was associated with fetal death and with neonatal asphyxia (including fetal death; n = 99), but not with major neonatal morbidity and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome. Moderately abnormal cCTG had no significant association with any endpoint. Simulation analysis showed that a strategy that combined cCTG results with umbilicocerebral ratio or umbilical absent or reversed end-diastolic flow could detect all fetal deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized CTG in combination with fetal arterial Doppler, with a strict protocol for the frequency of recordings, is likely to be more effective than visual CTG assessment for preventing fetal death in early preterm FGR. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Do labetalol and methyldopa have different effects on pregnancy outcome? Analysis of data from the Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes, accounting for allocated group, between methyldopa-treated and labetalol-treated women in the CHIPS Trial (ISRCTN 71416914) of 'less tight' versus 'tight' control of pregnancy hypertension. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of CHIPS Trial cohort. SETTING: International randomised controlled trial (94 sites, 15 countries). POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Of 987 CHIPS recruits, 481/566 (85.0%) women treated with antihypertensive therapy at randomisation. Of 981 (99.4%) women followed to delivery, 656/745 (88.1%) treated postrandomisation. METHODS: Logistic regression to compare outcomes among women who took methyldopa or labetalol, adjusted for the influence of baseline factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CHIPS primary (perinatal loss or high level neonatal care for >48 hours) and secondary (serious maternal complications) outcomes, birthweight <10th centile, severe maternal hypertension, pre-eclampsia and delivery at <34 or <37 weeks. RESULTS: Methyldopa and labetalol were used commonly at randomisation (243/987, 24.6% and 238/987, 24.6%, respectively) and post-randomisation (224/981, 22.8% and 433/981, 44.1%, respectively). Following adjusted analyses, methyldopa (versus labetalol) at randomisation was associated with fewer babies with birthweight <10th centile [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.48; 95% CI 0.20-0.87]. Methyldopa (versus labetalol) postrandomisation was associated with fewer CHIPS primary outcomes (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.40-1.00), birthweight <10th centile (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.32-0.92), severe hypertension (aOR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.83), pre-eclampsia (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.85), and delivery at <34 weeks (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.96) or <37 weeks (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.85). CONCLUSION: These nonrandomised comparisons are subject to residual confounding, but women treated with methyldopa (versus labetalol), particularly those with pre-existing hypertension, may have had better outcomes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: There was no evidence that women treated with methyldopa versus labetalol had worse outcomes.

Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study randomised controlled trial-are the results dependent on the choice of labetalol or methyldopa?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the difference in outcomes between 'less tight' (target diastolic blood pressure [dBP] of 100 mmHg) versus 'tight' control (target dBP of 85 mmHg) in the CHIPS Trial (ISRCTN 71416914, http://pre-empt.cfri.ca/;CHIPS) depended on the choice of labetalol or methyldopa, the two most commonly used antihypertensive agents in CHIPS. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of CHIPS Trial data. SETTING: International multicentre randomised controlled trial (94 sites, 15 countries). POPULATION OR SAMPLE: A total of 987 women with non-severe non-proteinuric pregnancy hypertension. METHODS: Logistic regression was used for comparisons of 'less tight' versus 'tight' control among women treated with labetalol (but not methydopa) versus methyldopa (but not labetalol). Analyses were adjusted for the influence of baseline factors, including use of any antihypertensive therapy at randomisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main CHIPS Trial outcomes: primary (perinatal loss or high-level neonatal care for > 48 hours), secondary (serious maternal complications), birthweight < 10th centile, severe maternal hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and delivery at < 34 or < 37 weeks. RESULTS: Of 987 women in CHIPS, antihypertensive therapy was taken by 566 women at randomisation (labetalol 111 ['less tight'] versus 127 ['tight'] or methyldopa 126 ['less tight'] versus 117 ['tight']) and 815 women after randomisation (labetalol 186 ['less tight'] versus 247 ['tight'] and methyldopa by 98 ['less tight'] versus 126 ['tight']). Following adjustment, odds ratios for outcomes in 'less tight' versus 'tight' control were similar between antihypertensive groups according to 'at randomisation' and 'after randomisation' therapy. CONCLUSION: Outcomes for 'less tight' versus 'tight' control were not dependent on use of methyldopa or labetalol. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: In the CHIPS Trial, maternal and infant outcomes were not dependent on use of labetalol or methyldopa.

[Hypocalcemic delirium due to magnesium sulphate therapy in a pregnant woman with pre-eclampsia]. / Hypocalciëmisch delier door magnesiumsulfaatbehandeling bij een zwangere met preëclampsie.

A 34-year-old pregnant patient, admitted with severe pre-eclampsia and the 'haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets' (HELLP) syndrome at 31 weeks gestational age, was treated with magnesium sulphate for imminent eclampsia. The further management was aimed at prolonging gestation. During treatment, a delirium developed with myoclonus. As the foetal condition deteriorated, caesarean section was performed. Afterwards, the delirium proved to have been due to hypocalcaemia. After appropriate treatment the patient recovered. In pre-eclampsia, the calcium metabolism is disturbed. Hypermagnesaemia inhibits parathyroid hormone secretion and can therefore cause hypocalcaemia. In rare cases, this may cause a delirium, which is unusual in pre-eclampsia. If the clinical (neurological) picture in a pregnant woman with severe pre-eclampsia, who is receiving treatment with magnesium sulphate, is not fully understood, hypocalcaemia should be considered.