Medical student´s motivational changes during the COVID-19 university lockdown: a mixed-method study.

BACKGROUND: During the crucial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face undergraduate medical education was disrupted and replaced with online teaching activities. Based on its emphasized impact on several outcomes, a deeper insight into the pandemic related effects on medical students´ motivation is aspirational. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the motivational changes that took place during the pandemic in medical students and explored, how motivation of medical students is influenced. METHODS: Using a mixed method inter-cohort study design, 4th year medical students´ motivation, assessed pre- and post-pandemic were compared. In subsequent qualitative analyses underlying variables that may have contributed to both- medical students´ motivation and pandemic related changes were identified. These variables were then systematically explored- both individually and in combination. In a final step, the results were embedded within the Self-Determination Theory. RESULTS: Students who were affected by the university lockdown reported significantly higher levels of less self-determined motivation and amotivation. The qualitative analysis identified determinants that influence medical students´ motivation. The common core of these determinants is lacking social interaction and support, with a great emphasis on the interaction with the lecturer and patients. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the crucial role of medical educators, patient contact, social interactions and personal support on students´ motivation. Students need to be strengthened in their beliefs about their abilities, the value of their task at hand and receive encouragement in their efforts. All this will result in an increased identification with the task and less detrimental outcomes.

National consensus on entrustable professional activities for competency-based training in anaesthesiology.

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) are specialty specific tasks or responsibilities, combining the clinical workplace and the long-demanded competency-based medical education. The first step to transform time-based into EPA-based training is to reach consensus on core EPAs that describe sufficiently the workplace. We aimed to present a nationally validated EPA-based curriculum for postgraduate training in anaesthesiology. Using a predefined and validated list of EPAs, we applied a Delphi consensus approach, involving all German chair directors of anaesthesiology. We then conducted a subsequent qualitative analysis. Thirty-four chair directors participated in the Delphi survey (77% response) and twenty-five completed all the questions (56% overall response). Reflected by the intra-class-correlation, the consensus on the importance (ICC: 0.781, 95% CI [0.671, 0.868]) and the year of entrustment (ICC: 0.973, 95% CI [0.959, 0.984]) of each EPA reached high levels of agreement among the chair directors. The comparison of data assessed in the preceding validation and present study showed excellent and good levels of agreement (ICC entrustment: 0.955, 95% CI [0.902, 0.978]; ICC importance: 0.671, 95% CI [-0.204, 0.888]). The adaptation process, based on the qualitative analysis, resulted in a final set of 34 EPAs. We present an elaborate, fully described and nationally validated EPA-based curriculum, reflecting a broad consensus among different stakeholders of anaesthesiology. We hereby provide a further step towards competency-based postgraduate anaesthesiology training.

Development and validation of a postgraduate anaesthesiology core curriculum based on Entrustable Professional Activities: a Delphi study.

Background: Postgraduate training curricula should not be based on time-spans or predefined numbers of performed procedures. One approach to link competencies to clinical tasks is the concept of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA). The goal of this study was the definition, ranking and validation of EPAs for anaesthesiology postgraduate training and the creation of an anaesthesiologic core curriculum. Methods: Anaesthesiologists of different levels of training participated in the study (single-center, cross-sectional) . First, an expert group defined a preliminary list of EPAs. Then a first Delphi round (n= 47 participants) was applied to identify daily anaesthesiology tasks with the goal to define EPAs. From the first Delphi round a new set of EPAs was defined, using the template and mapping method. Through an alignment process, conducted by the expert group, the preliminary EPAs and the new set of EPAs from the first Delphi round were summarised into a new list of EPAs. This list was presented to the study participants in a second Delphi round (n=80 participants), with the goal to validate and rank each EPA and to define the year of entrustment. For this purpose, participants were asked in the second Delphi round if each EPA should be included into an anaesthesiology core curriculum and in which year of training entrustment should take place. Furthermore, they were asked to rank each EPA on a numeric scale, defining its importance. From this numeric scale, the content validity index (CVI) for each EPA was calculated. Consensus of the results from the second Delphi round was calculated, using the one-way random effects model to calculate Intra-Class-Correlations (ICC). Percentages of agreement among the whole set of EPAs of this study and a previously published set of EPAs were computed. Results: A core-curriculum comprising of 39 EPAs was developed. The EPAs were subdivided into superior/high and inferior/low scoring EPAs, reflecting their importance and were mapped to the year of entrustment. The results reached high consensus among the different participating anaesthesiologist groups (overall agreement was 0.96 for the CVI of each EPA and 0.83 for the year in which the EPAs should be entrusted). Agreement with the previously defined set of EPAs was 73.3%. Conclusion: This study provides a further step in transforming postgraduate anaesthesiology training into a more contemporary approach. Other studies are necessary to complete and amend the presented core curriculum of EPA based postgraduate anaesthesiology training.