[Exploration and practice of post-marketing survival benefit evaluation of Chinese patent medicine for cancer].

Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) is an important feature of cancer treatment in China. The methods to tap the advantages of TCM, reasonably evaluate and accurately apply Chinese patent medicines have become current research hotspots and difficulties. TCM takes syndrome differentiation and treatment as the core, with the characteristics of overall regulation and multi-targets efficacy. Therefore, the post-marketing survival benefit evaluation of Chinese patent medicines for cancer is different from that in modern medicine. The primary treatment goals in cancer patients include to improve the disease control rate and prolong their survival time. At present, Chinese patent medicines for cancer patients are lacking indepth studies on survival benefit at the post-marketing stage. In addition, the characteristics of individualized treatment with TCM have also increased the complexity of clinical research on TCM. Therefore, it is of certain practical significance and necessity to evaluate the survival benefit of Chinese patent medicines for cancer after marketing. Based on this, in this paper, we first summarized the technical methodological means of survival benefit evaluation at this stage, and then explored the post-marketing survival benefit evaluation of Chinese patent medicines for cancer from three aspects: the evaluation of cancer treatment effect based on survival time and quality of life, treatment-related toxicity and the auxiliary effect of TCM, and the improvement effect for tumor-related symptoms. Based on the practices of early clinical researches, and according to the insufficient efficacy evaluation of current clinical research on Chinese patent medicines, this paper proposed to improve the evaluation system for clinical researches on Chinese patent medicines, establish the evaluation method with TCM characteristics, clarify the dominant population, lay a theoretical foundation for the evaluation of post-marketing survival benefits of Chinese patent medicines for cancer in the future, and promote the modernization process of TCM.

Efficacy and safety of Kanglaite injection combined with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 32 RCTs.

BACKGROUND: As a Chinese medicine injections, Kanglaite injection (KLT) is a complementary or alternative therapy for first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the effect that certain factors, including the dose of KLT, chemotherapy cycles, evaluation criteria, or supportive treatment, have on the efficacy of the objective response rate (ORR), median survival time (MST), and adverse reactions is still unknown. METHODS: Eight databases were systematically searched from the inception dates to December 1, 2019, using the keywords Kanglaite, chemotherapy, and non small cell lung carcinoma to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 15.1. RESULTS: There were 32 randomized controlled trials, involving 2,577 participants, that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Compared with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy alone, KLT combined with chemotherapy could increase the ORR [risk ratio (RR), 1.41 (95% CI: 1.28 to 1.56); absolute risk difference (ARD), 0.13 (95% CI: 0.1 to 0.17)], decrease the risk ratio of adverse reactions [nausea and vomiting: RR, 0.58 (95% CI: 0.42 to 0.81); ARD, -0.17 (95% CI: -0.26 to -0.08); leukopenia: RR, 0.61 (95% CI: 0.44 to 0.86); ARD, -0.16 (95% CI: -0.24 to -0.08)], prolong MST, and increase disease control rate and Karnofsky performance status. According to the subgroup analyses, KLT combined with cisplatin or paraplatin plus paclitaxel (TP) failed to demonstrate a significant association with the ORR. And when lacking the use of supportive treatment, this combination would not decrease the RR of both adverse reactions compared with chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: KLT plus first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, except when chemotherapy regimens were TP, increased efficacy and quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC. We are unsure whether this combination offers a low risk of adverse reactions. Additional high-quality RCTs are warranted to assess the effects of the combined therapy further.