Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 28(2): 191-7, 2007 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17265401

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immediate, persistent and sustained in vivo activity of an alcohol-based surgical hand disinfectant, consisting of a zinc gel and a preservative system containing a synergistic combination of farnesol and benzethonium chloride (ZBF disinfectant), and to develop a pig skin model for in vitro evaluation of the immediate and persistent efficacy of alcohol-based surgical hand disinfectants against resident hand flora. DESIGN: The in vivo immediate, persistent, and sustained activity of ZBF disinfectant was evaluated using human volunteers and the "glove-juice" method described in the US Food and Drug Administration's Tentative Final Monograph (FDA-TFM) for Healthcare Antiseptic Products. A novel in vitro pig skin model was developed to compare the immediate and persistent activity of alcohol-based surgical hand disinfectants against resident flora using Staphylococcus epidermidis as the test organism. Four alcohol-based surgical hand disinfectants were evaluated using this model. RESULTS: The results for the ZBF disinfectant exceed the FDA-TFM criteria for immediate, persistent, and sustained activity required for surgical hand disinfectants. The reduction factors for the 4 hand disinfectants obtained using the pig skin model show good agreement with the log(10) reductions in concentrations of hand flora obtained using human volunteers to test for immediate and persistent activity. CONCLUSION: The ZBF disinfectant we evaluated met the FDA-TFM criteria for surgical hand disinfectants. The immediate and persistent efficacy of the surgical hand disinfectants evaluated with the novel pig skin model described in this study shows good agreement with the results obtained in vivo.


Assuntos
Álcoois/farmacologia , Benzetônio/farmacologia , Desinfetantes/farmacologia , Farneseno Álcool/farmacologia , Mãos/microbiologia , Animais , Benzetônio/administração & dosagem , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Farneseno Álcool/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Pele/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efeitos dos fármacos , Suínos
3.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 209(5): 477-87, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16750419

RESUMO

Healthcare workers are required to disinfect the hands several times a day using hand disinfectants, which leads to chronic hand exposure to high levels of antimicrobials contained in the disinfectants, which could compromise the skin integrity. This problem may be addressed by developing hand disinfectants containing synergistic combinations of small amounts of antimicrobials and other agents. The synergistic effect of farnesol and essential oils with several antimicrobials was studied in vitro to select an effective antimicrobial system in preservative concentration for use in healthcare hand rub. Farnesol and lemon oil showed synergistic activity against S. aureus, in combination with benzalkonium chloride and benzethonium chloride, but not with other antimicrobials studied. All essential oils studied showed synergy with benzethonium chloride against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. An alcohol-based healthcare hand rub (ZBF hand rub) containing this unique synergistic combination of farnesol and benzethonium chloride was then developed and its efficacy as a healthcare hand rub was evaluated in human volunteers according to the US FDA-TFM protocol using Serratia marcescens as a marker organism. The ZBF hand rub showed a 3.22 log(10) reduction in the microbial count after the first application and a 5.49 log(10) reduction after the tenth application in vivo and exceeds the US FDA-TFM criteria for healthcare hand rub. The ZBF hand rub did not irritate the hands when tested on human volunteers when applied 10 times everyday for five consecutive days. The ZBF hand rub exhibits more than 5.5 log(10) reduction in the microbial count within 15s and more than 2.8 log(10) reduction in the two types of viruses tested within 30s in vitro. When evaluated in an in vitro pig skin model, the ZBF hand rub shows better prolonged activity (20-35 min post-application) against transient bacteria (S. aureus and E. coli) compared to other alcohol-based hand rubs. These findings suggest that the use of the ZBF hand rub amongst health care workers may lower the risk of chronic hand exposure to high levels of antimicrobials without compromising the efficacy.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/farmacologia , Benzetônio/farmacologia , Farneseno Álcool/farmacologia , Desinfecção das Mãos , Óleos Voláteis/farmacologia , Animais , Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Dermatoses da Mão/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Serratia marcescens/efeitos dos fármacos , Suínos
4.
Dermatitis ; 16(1): 22-7, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15996346

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many health care workers are sensitized to the proteins in natural rubber latex and get contact dermatitis as a result of wearing latex gloves. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate a topical formulation containing a zinc gel (Allergy Guard) as a prophylactic against latex glove-related contact dermatitis. METHODS: The study was carried out with volunteers who exhibited mild to moderate contact dermatitis (type IV) after wearing latex gloves as per the protocol. RESULTS: Allergy Guard significantly reduced skin irritation in volunteers who exhibited type IV hypersensitivity when exposed to latex gloves. Allergy Guard also exhibited a barrier effect as shown by the permeation of chlorophyllin dye into the skin of volunteers. Allergy Guard prevented dermal irritation induced by sodium lauryl sulfate. CONCLUSION: Topical formulations containing a zinc gel may be used to delay or prevent latex sensitivity, especially among health care professionals.


Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Dermatoses da Mão/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/prevenção & controle , Zinco/administração & dosagem , Administração Tópica , Dermatite Ocupacional/patologia , Géis , Dermatoses da Mão/patologia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 52(3): 389-96, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12917250

RESUMO

An agar subcutaneous infection model (agar model), which simulates the rat subcutaneous infection model (rat model), was developed to assess the ability of antimicrobial catheters to resist microbial colonization. The catheters were implanted in the agar and rat models and the insertion sites were infected immediately or on day 7, 14 or 21 post-implantation. The catheters implanted in the agar model were transferred to fresh media one day before infection on day 7, 14 or 21. The efficacy of chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine impregnated (CS) catheters, CS catheters with higher levels of chlorhexidine (CS+ catheters), minocycline-rifampicin (MR) catheters and silver catheters against Staphylococcus aureus and rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis RIF-r2 was compared in the agar and rat models. No significant difference in the adherence or the drug release was found between the in vitro and in vivo models. In both models, CS+ and MR catheters were effective against S. aureus even when infected on day 14, whereas CS catheters were colonized when challenged on day 7. CS+ catheters were effective against S. epidermidis RIF-r2, whereas MR catheters showed adherence when infected on day 7. CS+ catheters prevented colonization of all the organisms including, Enterobacter aerogenes, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans in the agar model, whereas MR catheters were effective only against S. aureus and S. epidermidis strains. Silver catheters were ineffective against all the organisms. The agar model may be used to predict the in vivo efficacy of antimicrobial catheters against various pathogens.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/farmacologia , Aderência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateterismo , Dermatopatias Infecciosas/microbiologia , Ágar , Animais , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Clorexidina/farmacologia , Meios de Cultura , Desinfetantes/farmacologia , Feminino , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Sulfadiazina de Prata/farmacologia
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 24(7): 506-13, 2003 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12887239

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of urinary Foley catheters (latex and silicone) impregnated with (1) chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (CXS) and (2) chlorhexidine, silver sulfadiazine, and triclosan (CXST) in inhibiting extra-luminal bacterial adherence and to compare their efficacy with that of silver hydrogel latex (SH) and nitrofurazone-treated silicone (NF) catheters. DESIGN: The antimicrobial spectrum of these catheters was evaluated using a zone of inhibition assay. A novel in vitro urinary tract model was developed to study the potential in vivo efficacy of antimicrobial catheters in preventing extraluminal bacterial colonization. The "meatus" was inoculated daily with Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aerginosa, and Candida albicans. The "bladder" portion of the model was cultured daily to determine bacterial growth. RESULTS: Both CXS and CXST catheters had a broader antimicrobial spectrum than SH and NF catheters. In the in vitro model, CXST latex and silicone catheters exhibited significantly better efficacy (3 to 25days) against uropathogens, compared with CXS (1 to 14 days) and control (0 to 5 days) catheters (P = .01). CXST latex catheters exhibited significantly longer protection against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, compared with SH catheters (P = .01). CXST silicone catheters resisted colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis for a significantly longer period (23 to 24 days) than did NF catheters (9 to 11 days) (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Catheters impregnated with synergistic combinations of chlorhexidine, silver sulfadiazine, and triclosan exhibited broad-spectrum, long-term resistance against microbial colonization on their outer surfaces.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Urinários/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Cateterismo Urinário/instrumentação , Anti-Infecciosos Urinários/classificação , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Cateteres de Demora , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/farmacologia , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Modelos Biológicos , Sulfadiazina de Prata/administração & dosagem , Sulfadiazina de Prata/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Triclosan/administração & dosagem , Triclosan/farmacologia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...