Anatomy variant symptomatic of the duplication of the common bile duct type IV.

INTRODUCTION: Duplicity of the common bile duct (BCBD) is an unusual congenital disorder. CASE REPORT: A 80-year-old woman with duplication of the common bile duct with retrograde endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) who did not resolve the symptoms. DISCUSSION: Our case is a variant of type IV to the classification of DCBC. The MR cholangiography and presurgical ERCP allows assessment of the bile ducts, their caliber, and assessment of abnormalities. The treatment before DCBC will depend on the clinic and the type of opening of the CBCA. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to perform a pre-surgical study and during surgery with CIO.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La duplicidad del conducto biliar común (DCBC) es una alteración congénita insólita. CASO CLÍNICO: Mujer de 80 años con duplicación de la vía biliar común con colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) que no dilucida la clínica. DISCUSIÓN: Este caso es una variante del tipo IV de la clasificación de DCBC. La colangiorresonancia y la CPRE prequirúrgica permiten valorar las vías biliares, su calibre y las anormalidades. El tratamiento depende de la clínica y el tipo de apertura del conducto biliar común accesorio. CONCLUSIONES: Es importante realizar estudio prequirúrgico y durante la operación con colangiografía intraoperatoria.

[Axillary hidrosadenitis due to Leishmania: Case report and literature review]. / Hidrosadenitis axilar por Leishmania: presentación de un caso y revisión de la bibliografía.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis is a disorder where abscesses appear after the infection of the apocrine sweat glands. It is located normally in the axillae, groin, perineal region, and the scalp. CLINICAL CASE: A 37 year old male was referred by his GP to the General Surgery Department with axillary hidradenitis which had evolved over the years. The physical examination shows signs of hidradenitis in both axillae, with a noticeable suppurative hidradenitis in the right armpit. En bloc extirpation was performed to remove the whole affected area. The pathological examination revealed a cutaneous leishmaniasis. Subsequently, fucidin was administered topically, as well as local infiltrations of one millilitre of Glucantime™. DISCUSSION: Hidradenitis normally appears in intertriginous areas and its manifestation is accompanied by recurrent subcutaneous nodules. The incidence rate in females is three times higher than in males. The isolated Hidradenitis caused by Leishmania is a rare condition presented only in endemic areas or in immunocompromised patients, such as HIV-infected patients. Clinical manifestations can be different and the diagnosis can be confirmed through haematoxylin-eosin. The main pattern displays a disorganised granuloma without necrosis. Systemic or topical treatment can be applied. Immunotherapy treatment is the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Hidradenitis caused by Leishmania in HIV-negative patients is a rare condition. Therefore it is important to perform a good histological diagnosis and to administer the right treatment.