Improved outcome in asymptomatic recurrence following curative surgery for gastric cancer.

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome and resectability of patients with gastric cancer recurrence after curative surgery detected by follow-up endoscopy, according to the presence or absence of symptoms. All patients with gastric carcinoma, who underwent a curative gastrectomy, were retrospectively identified. We analyzed outcome and survival in patients compliant with routine follow-up who presented symptomatic and asymptomatic recurrence. Of the 119 resected patients, 63.0% had a recurrence, with an overall survival of 20.0 months. Fourteen patients were asymptomatic when recurrence was detected, whereas 61 patients were symptomatic. Median time to recurrence was 16.0 m for both groups. A local curative re-resection was possible in 2/14 (asymptomatic) and 1/61 (symptomatic). Asymptomatic patients had a longer median postrecurrence survival time of 9.0 months, compared with 2.0 months in the symptomatic patients (p=0.034). The median overall survival was greater in the asymptomatic vs symptomatic group (25.0 vs 20.0 months), although this did not reach statistical significance. The results from this study advocate that the presence or absence of symptoms is a good surrogate marker to assess biologic aggressiveness. The value of routine follow-up endoscopy to permit a higher rate of re-resection in asymptomatic patients remains to be established.

Knowledge about cancer screening among medical students and internal medicine residents in Mexico City.

It is extremely important that physicians are aware of cancer screening precise indications. We sought to explore its knowledge among Mexican medical students and internal medicine residents. Students and residents completed a questionnaire-based survey about breast, cervical, colon, and prostate cancer screening. Four hundred fifty-one individuals answered the survey: 64.52% students and 35.48% residents. Mean knowledge score was 63.97 ± 14.97. Residents scored higher than students (p = 0.0001). No difference in the education concerning cervical and colon cancer screening was found. Knowledge of screening guidelines is suboptimal among medical students and residents. Further efforts should be targeted to educational and training programs in this country.

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: experience at a single institution in Mexico.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RSTS) are a rare and uncommon entity with a poor 5-year overall survival (OS) of approximately 50%, even though they rarely metastasize. The aim of the present study was to analyze the survival of patients with RSTS treated at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with RSTS treated between 1990 and 2008 were included. Variables analyzed were age, sex, histological type, TNM stage, tumor size, grade of differentiation, and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy only, radiotherapy only, adjuvant radiotherapy, and best supportive care). R0, R1, and R2 resection were analyzed. Overall survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and survival comparison by stage, grade, and type of resection were analyzed. RESULTS: Data for 46 patients were analyzed, 20 men and 26 women. Median age was 51.1 years. Surgery with a curative intent was performed in 32 patients, and R0 resection was feasible in 19 (59.4%). The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 47 and 30%, respectively, for the entire group. The median CSS for resected patients was 102 months; the 5-year OS for stages I, III, and IV was 83, 37, and 0%, respectively; the 5-year OS for low histological grade disease and high histological grade disease was 82 and 35%, respectively; and for R0, R1, and R2 resection, the 5-year OS was 81, 56, and 14%, respectively. Median RFS was 79 months. CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete surgical resection, unresectable disease, high histological grade, and advanced TNM stage are associated with a poor survival in patients with RSTS. Complete resection is still the treatment of choice.