Efficiency in the governance of the Covid-19 pandemic: political and territorial factors.

BACKGROUND: The pandemic generated by Covid-19 has changed the way of life of citizens around the world in a short time, affecting all areas of society directly or indirectly, which is facing a global health crisis with different national responses implemented by governments. Several months into the pandemic, the first after-effects of Covid-19 are beginning to be felt by citizens, who are questioning the management carried out so far. In order to improve the performance of governmental decisions to reduce the impact of the pandemic during the coming months, we calculated the levels of efficiency in the management of health resources. In addition, we identify some country characteristics that may condition efficient management. RESULTS: We obtained significant differences according to the geographical location of the country, with European and American countries being less efficient than Asian and African countries. Likewise, we can affirm that greater freedom of expression, a higher median age and an unstable economy and labor market reduce efficiency. However, female leadership of the government and greater compliance with the rule of law offer more efficient management, as do countries that derive more revenues from tourism. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide an opportunity for political leaders to reflect on their management during these months of the pandemic in order to identify mistakes and improve the implementation of effective measures. It has been shown that using more resources does not mean managing better; therefore, policymakers need to pay special attention to the use of resources, taking into account the budgetary constraints of the public sector.

Which region and which sector leads the circular economy? CEBIX, a multivariant index based on business actions.

The circular economy encompasses a sustainable economic model based on a production, consumption, distribution and maintenance process that reuses as much as possible. In this research, the two-step composite Circular Economy Business Index was created, based on 17 environmental practices that companies have implemented to reduce the generation of waste and emissions and to increase the reuse and efficiency of materials and energy, among other actions. The use of a sample of 26,783 companies from 49 countries and 10 sectors for the period 2014-2019 allowed the aggregation of these initiatives at the country and industry levels. In this sense, our results show less progress in the circular transformation worldwide and can be used in the design of policies aimed at promoting changes in production and consumption systems in specific geographic or industrial contexts.

Industry mimetic isomorphism and sustainable development based on the X-STATIS and HJ-biplot methods.

Based on both neo-institutional theory and comparative institutional analysis, this paper studies the role that mimetic forces play in the patterns and evolution of behavior concerning company sustainability. The panel data is composed of 6600 observations of 600 international large listed companies belonging to 39 different activity sectors for the period 2004-2014. Through employing the multivariate statistical methods HJ-biplot and X-STATIS, which provide a useful visualization of a complex data structure in a low-dimensional space, it can be observed that mimetic forces indicate that firms operating in high-impact sectors-sectors that operate under greater pressure from interest groups-face greater social and environmental risks and have higher corporate social responsibility (CSR) scores than companies from other sectors. The adoption or development of CSR practices depends largely on the type of industry in which the company operates, as stakeholder engagement in different industry sectors has different areas of concern. Therefore, companies operating in more polluting sectors, such as mining, paper, chemicals, or oil, give higher priority to environmental protection and defense of human rights, while other, less polluting companies involved in the communication sector are concerned to a greater extent by social issues, such as business ethics or the rights of their employees. Finally, this paper evidences that firms operating in similar contexts, in industries that face analogous risks and challenges, probably develop common policies and regulations with the aim of mitigating the pressures applied by their major stakeholder groups.

Sociopolitical and economic elements to explain the environmental performance of countries.

The present research explains environmental performance using an ecological composite index as the dependent variable and focusing on two national dimensions: sociopolitical characteristics and economics. Environmental performance is measured using the Composite Index of Environmental Performance (CIEP) indicator proposed by García-Sánchez et al. (2015). The first model performs a factor analysis to aggregate the variables according to each analyzed dimension. In the second model, the estimation is run using only single variables. Both models are estimated using generalized least square estimation (GLS) using panel data from 152 countries and 6 years. The results show that sociopolitical factors and international trade have a positive effect on environmental performance. When the variables are separately analyzed, democracy and social policy have a positive effect on environmental performance while transport, infrastructure, consumption of goods, and tourism have a negative effect. Further observation is that the trade-off between importing and exporting countries overshadows the pollution caused by production. It was also observed that infrastructure has a negative coefficient for developing countries and positive for developed countries. The best performances are in the democratic and richer countries that are located in Europe, while the worst environmental performance is by the nondemocratic and the poorest countries, which are on the African continent.