RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Duplicity of the common bile duct is an unusual congenital disorder. CASE REPORT: A 80-year-old woman with duplication of the common bile duct with retrograde endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) who did not resolve the symptoms. DISCUSSION: Our case is a variant of type IV to the classification of duplicity of the common bile duct. The magnetic resonance cholangiography and presurgical ERCP allows assessment of the bile ducts, their caliber, and assessment of abnormalities. The treatment before duplicity of the common bile duct will depend on the clinic and the type of opening of the accessory common bile duct. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to perform a pre-surgical study and during surgery with intrasurgical cholangiography.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La duplicidad del conducto biliar común es una alteración congénita insólita. CASO CLÍNICO: Mujer de 80 años con duplicación de la vía biliar común con colangiopancreatografías retrógradas endoscópicas (CPRE) que no solventan la clínica. DISCUSIÓN: Nuestro caso es una variante del tipo IV de la clasificación de duplicidad del conducto biliar común. La colangiopancreatografía por resonancia magnética y la CPRE prequirúrgica permiten valorar las vías biliares, su calibre y sus posibles anormalidades. El tratamiento dependerá de la clínica y del tipo de apertura del conducto biliar común accesorio. CONCLUSIONES: Es importante realizar un estudio prequirúrgico y durante la cirugía con colangiografía intraoperatoria.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Silicatos de Alumínio , Ductos Biliares , Colangiografia , Ducto Colédoco/diagnóstico por imagem , Ducto Colédoco/cirurgia , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Doenças Mamárias/diagnóstico , Glândulas Mamárias Humanas/fisiopatologia , Fístula/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Duodeno/cirurgia , Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , UltrassonografiaAssuntos
Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Duodeno , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cisto Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagem , Cisto Pancreático/etiologia , Cisto Pancreático/patologia , Cisto Pancreático/cirurgia , Ductos Pancreáticos/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Laparoscopic surgery is performed in the treatment of colorectal and appendiceal cancer, and PC from diverse origin in selected patients. HIPEC management by laparoscopic approach after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) completed locoregional treatment of PC, and may be feasible and safe after appropriate patient selection. OBJECTIVE: Development of an experimental model of HIPEC by laparoscopic approach, with CO2 recirculation. Clinical translation in two patients with PC and low peritoneal cancer index. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed CRS in a porcine model of 5 pigs (35-38 kg) by laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic HIPEC by CO2 recirculation system was performed; laparoscopic access was used for catheter input and output placement (Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 for 60 min at 42 °C). The experimental variables were: blood gases, haemodynamic and intra-abdominal and central temperature. Clinical model application was performed in three cases with PC from colorectal origin. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences was found in blood gases, haemodynamic or temperature in the experimental study. In clinical study, there were no technical complications during laparoscopic-HIPEC approach, and we observed no changes in haemodynamic variables during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: CRS and HIPEC laparoscopic model by CO2 recirculation system is safe and feasible technique in selected patients, that include low PC index, local and accessible tumour recurrences or high-risk of PC tumours.
Assuntos
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Dióxido de Carbono/uso terapêutico , Hipertermia Induzida , Laparoscopia , Mitomicina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Gasometria , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Peritoneais/sangue , Neoplasias Peritoneais/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/cirurgia , Suínos , Porco MiniaturaRESUMO
Objetivo. Describir la casuística de pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama intervenidas en el Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real mediante un programa de cirugía mayor ambulatoria (CMA). Pacientes y método. Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo donde se presenta la serie de pacientes del Hospital General de Ciudad Real con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama e intervenidas quirúrgicamente en el periodo comprendido entre el 1 de enero de 2010 y el 1 de febrero de 2011. Resultados. Se intervinieron un total de 130 pacientes; de ellas, un 20% se consideraron larga estancia, un 32,3% corta estancia y un 47,7%, CMA. En el 69,4% de los casos, las técnicas quirúrgicas más asociadas a CMA fueron cirugías conservadoras. Conclusiones. La cirugía del cáncer de mama es factible en programas de cirugía mayor ambulatoria, con criterios establecidos de selección de pacientes. Las técnicas conservadoras fueron las más empleadas en nuestro programa (AU)
Objective. To describe the series of patients diagnosed with breast cancer that went to the operation room in the Ambulatory Surgery Program in the University General Hospital of Ciudad Real. Patients and methods. Retrospective descriptive study of patients diagnosed of breast cancer in University General Hospital of Ciudad Real and had been operated between 01-01-2010 to 01-02-2011. Results. 130 patients were analyzed. 20% were considered long stay more than 72 hours, 32,3% were short stay and 47,7% were ambulatory surgery. Conservative surgery were performed in 69,4% of all the cases included. Conclusion. Breast cancer surgery is feasible in ambulatory surgery programs with patients selection criteria. Conservative techniques were the most common surgery in our program (AU)