Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 6777, 2017 07 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28754991

RESUMO

We developed a novel method, PyroTyping, for discrimination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates combining pyrosequencing and IS6110 polymorphism. A total of 100 isolates were analysed with IS6110-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), spoligotyping, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units - variable number tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTR), and PyroTyping. PyroTyping results regarding clustering or discrimination of the isolates were highly concordant with the other typing methods performed. PyroTyping is more rapid than RFLP and presents the same discriminatory power, thus, it may be useful for taking timely decisions for tuberculosis control.


Assuntos
Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Genótipo , Repetições Minissatélites/genética , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/classificação , Polimorfismo de Fragmento de Restrição/genética
2.
J Infect ; 71(2): 220-30, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25936742

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the diagnostic accuracy of a multiplex real-time PCR (Anyplex II MTB/MDR/XDR, Seegene, Corea) that detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), fluoroquinolones (FLQ) and injectable drugs (kanamycin [KAN], amikacin [AMK] and capreomycin [CAP]) in isolates and specimens. METHODS: One hundred fourteen cultured isolates and 73 sputum specimens were retrospectively selected. Results obtained with multiplex PCR were compared with those obtained with BACTEC. Discordant results between multiplex PCR and BACTEC were tested by alternative molecular methods. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of multiplex PCR for detecting drug resistance in isolates were 76.5% and 100%, respectively, for INH; 97.2% and 96.0%, respectively, for RIF; 70.4% and 87.9%, respectively, for FLQ; 81.5% and 84.8%, respectively, for KAN; 100% and 60%, respectively, for AMK, and 100% and 72.3%, respectively, for CAP. Sensitivity and specificity of Anyplex for detecting drug resistance in specimens were 93.3% and 100%, respectively, for INH; 100% and 100%, respectively, for RIF; 50.0% and 100%, respectively, for FLQ; and 100% and 94.4%, respectively, for both KAN and CAP. Among the discordant results, 87.7% (71/81) of results obtained with the multiplex PCR were concordant with at least one of the alternative molecular methods. CONCLUSIONS: This multiplex PCR may be a useful tool for the rapid identification of drug resistant tuberculosis in isolates and specimens, thus allowing an initial therapeutic approach. Nevertheless, for a correct management of patients, results should be confirmed by a phenotypic method.


Assuntos
Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Resistência a Medicamentos , Humanos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(1): 30-6, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22075597

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the GenoType MTBDRsl assay (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany) for its ability to detect resistance to fluoroquinolones (FLQ), injectable second-line antibiotics [kanamycin (KM) and capreomycin (CM)], and ethambutol (EMB) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical strains and directly in clinical samples. A total of 34 clinical strains were characterized with the Bactec 460 TB system. Fifty-four clinical samples from 16 patients (5 were smear negative and 49 were smear positive) were also tested directly. The corresponding isolates of the clinical specimens were also analyzed with the Bactec 460TB. When there was a discrepancy between assays, pyrosequencing was performed. The overall rates of concordance of the MTBDRsl and the Bactec 460TB for the detection of FLQ, KM/CM, and EMB susceptibility in clinical strains were 72.4% (21/29), 88.8% (24/27), and 67.6% (23/34), whereas for clinical samples, rates were 86.5% (45/52), 92.3% (48/52), and 56% (28/50), respectively. In conclusion, the GenoType MTBDRsl assay may be a useful tool for making early decisions regarding KM/CM susceptibility and to a lesser extent regarding FLQ and EMB susceptibility. The test is able to detect mutations in both clinical strains and samples with a short turnaround time. However, for correct management of patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, results must be confirmed by a phenotypical method.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Etambutol/farmacologia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Tuberculose/microbiologia , Capreomicina/farmacologia , DNA Bacteriano/química , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacologia , Genótipo , Alemanha , Humanos , Canamicina/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Mutação de Sentido Incorreto , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Análise de Sequência de DNA
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(10): 3683-6, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21813715

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate a pyrosequencing method for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates resistant to rifampin and isoniazid using both clinical strains and clinical samples, comparing the results with those of the Bactec 460TB and GenoType MTBDRplus assays. In comparison to Bactec 460TB as the gold standard, the sensitivity of pyrosequencing for detecting isoniazid and rifampin resistance was 76.9% and 97.2%, respectively, for clinical strains, and the specificity was 97.2 and 97.9%, respectively. For clinical specimens, the sensitivity and specificity for both drugs were 85.7% and 100%, respectively. The overall concordance between pyrosequencing and the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for clinical strains was 99.1%, and for clinical samples, it was 98.2%. Pyrosequencing is a valuable tool for rifampin and isoniazid resistance detection.


Assuntos
Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Isoniazida/farmacologia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Rifampina/farmacologia , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/microbiologia
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(11): 3660-7, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18784319

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the GenoType MTBDRplus assay (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany) for its ability to detect resistance to rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical strains and directly in clinical samples. A total of 62 clinical strains characterized with the Bactec 460TB system were included. For the INH-resistant strains, the MIC was measured and sequencing was performed. Sixty-five clinical samples from 28 patients (39 smear-positive samples and 26 smear-negative samples) were also tested directly. The corresponding isolates of the clinical specimens were studied with the Bactec 460TB system. The overall rates of concordance of the MTBDRplus assay and the Bactec 460TB system for the detection of RIF and INH susceptibility in clinical strains were 98.3% (61/62) and 79% (49/62), respectively. The rate of concordance between the Bactec 460TB system and the MTBDRplus test for the detection of INH resistance in the group of 27 strains with low-level resistance was 62.9% (17/27), and that for the detection of INH resistance in the group of 21 strains with high-level resistance was 85.71% (18/21). Valid test results were obtained for 78.45% (51/65) of the clinical samples tested. The rates of concordance between both assays for the detection of drug resistance in these samples were 98% (50/51) for RIF and 96.2% (49/51) for INH. Taking into account only one sample per patient, the overall rate of concordance between both tests was 92.85% (26/28). The GenoType MTBDRplus assay is easy to perform and is a useful tool for the management of tuberculosis, as it allows the detection of resistance to RIF and INH in M. tuberculosis strains and also in clinical samples.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Resistência a Medicamentos , Isoniazida/farmacologia , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Rifampina/farmacologia , Genótipo , Alemanha , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Tuberculose/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...