First-line mFOLFOX plus cetuximab followed by mFOLFOX plus cetuximab or single-agent cetuximab as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Phase II randomised MACRO2 TTD study.

BACKGROUND: This multicentre, randomised, and phase II study evaluated mFOLFOX+cetuximab followed by maintenance mFOLFOX+cetuximab or single-agent cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (NCT01161316). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously, untreated mCRC patients (wild-type KRAS) were randomised to receive cetuximab+mFOLFOX-6 (8 cycles for 2 weeks) followed by maintenance therapy: single-agent cetuximab (Arm-A) or mFOLFOX-6 + cetuximab (Arm-B) until progression. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 9 months. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients (median [range] age 60 [33-74] years) were randomised (2:1): 129 Arm-A versus 64 Arm-B. PFS at 9 months (95% confidence interval) showed non-inferiority between arms (Arm-A/Arm-B: 60 [52, 69]%/72 [61, 83]%, p [non-inferiority]<0.1). There were no statistically significant differences in the PFS (Arm-A/Arm-B: 9 [95% CI 7, 10] months/10 [7,13] months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.19 [0.80, 1.79]) or overall survival (23 [19, 28] months/27 [18, 36] months, HR = 1.24 [0.85, 1.79]) between arms. The objective response rate was also similar (48 [39, 57]%/39 [27, 52]%). The safety profile was similar between arms, and all patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE) (Arm-A/Arm-B grade ≥III AEs: 70%/68%). The most common grade ≥III AEs were as follows: neutropenia (Arm-A/Arm-B: 28%/26%), rash acneiform (15%/24%) and sensory neuropathy (2%/15%) in any group. Arm-A was associated with less grade ≥III rash and sensory neuropathy and a lower rate of serious AEs (20%/27%). CONCLUSION(S): This phase II exploratory trial with a non-inferiority design suggests that maintenance therapy with single-agent cetuximab following mFOLFOX+cetuximab induction could be a valuable option compared with mFOLFOX+cetuximab treatment continuation. We await phase III trials to confirm single-agent cetuximab as maintenance therapy in mCRC patients.

Cross-sensitivity between taxanes in patients with breast cancer.

AIM This study was a retrospective analysis of our experience with severe cross-hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to the taxanes paclitaxel (P) and docetaxel (D) in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated patients with breast cancer treated with P or D who experienced severe HSR to one of the two taxanes. Severe HSR was defined as any reaction severe enough to warrant discontinuation of the drug. Initial intravenous premedication for paclitaxel was dexamethasone (20 mg), ranitidine (50 mg) and dexchlorpheniramine (10 mg). For docetaxel, dexamethasone (4 mg) orally every 12 hours was administered the day before infusion and dexamethasone (20 mg) was administered intravenously prior to infusion. After severe HSR to the taxane and 30 minutes before infusion of another taxane, we administered dexamethasone (20 mg), ranitidine (50 mg) and dexchlorpheniramine (10 mg) iv as a premedication, and we also increased the time of the infusion. RESULTS Between March 2009 and April 2010, 23 patients experienced an initial severe HSR to taxane (12 P, 11 D). Substitution of another taxane was conducted in 17 patients in the two weeks following the initial HSR. Eight patients had an initial HSR with P, and three had a cross-HSR to D. Nine patients had an initial HSR to D, and four of these patients had a cross-HSR to P. Among the 17 patients who received both taxanes, 7 (41%) had a cross-HSR. All cross- HSRs were sufficiently severe (grade 3-4) to suspend taxane treatment permanently. In the remaining 6 patients, a desensitisation protocol to taxanes was performed by increasing the dose of the diluted drug (4 P, 2 D), which resulted in administration of the drug without complications in all cases. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION Severe cross-HSR between P and D occurred in a significant proportion of our patients with breast cancer, so care must be taken when substituting taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel). A desensitisation protocol can be an effective alternative to decrease the risk of a new HSR.

Cross-sensitivity between taxanes in patients with breast cancer

AIM This study was a retrospective analysis of our experience with severe cross-hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to the taxanes paclitaxel (P) and docetaxel (D) in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated patients with breast cancer treated with P or D who experienced severe HSR to one of the two taxanes. Severe HSR was defined as any reaction severe enough to warrant discontinuation of the drug. Initial intravenous premedication for paclitaxel was dexamethasone (20 mg), ranitidine (50 mg) and dexchlorpheniramine (10 mg). For docetaxel, dexamethasone (4 mg) orally every 12 hours was administered the day before infusion and dexamethasone (20 mg) was administered intravenously prior to infusion. After severe HSR to the taxane and 30 minutes before infusion of another taxane, we administered dexamethasone (20 mg), ranitidine (50 mg) and dexchlorpheniramine (10 mg) iv as a premedication, and we also increased the time of the infusion. RESULTS Between March 2009 and April 2010, 23 patients experienced an initial severe HSR to taxane (12 P, 11 D). Substitution of another taxane was conducted in 17 patients in the two weeks following the initial HSR. Eight patients had an initial HSR with P, and three had a cross-HSR to D. Nine patients had an initial HSR to D, and four of these patients had a cross-HSR to P. Among the 17 patients who received both taxanes, 7 (41%) had a cross-HSR. All cross- HSRs were sufficiently severe (grade 3-4) to suspend taxane treatment permanently. In the remaining 6 patients, a desensitisation protocol to taxanes was performed by increasing the dose of the diluted drug (4 P, 2 D), which resulted in administration of the drug without complications in all cases. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION Severe cross-HSR between P and D occurred in a significant proportion of our patients with breast cancer, so care must be taken when substituting taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel). A desensitisation protocol can be an effective alternative to decrease the risk of a new HSR (AU)

Is it possible to increase pCR in the neoadjuvant treatment with a dose-dense/sequential combination?: results from a phase II Trial combining epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel and gemcitabine ± trastuzumab in stage II and III breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of a combination of epirubicin (E) and cyclophosphamide (C) followed by paclitaxel (P) and gemcitabine (G) (+ trastuzumab[T]) in Her2+ patients) in a sequential and dose-dense schedule as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stages II and III patients with breast cancer. Secondary endpoints: clinical response rate, disease free survival, safety and correlation between pCR and biologic markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were treated with E (90 mg/m²) and C (600 mg/m²) for 3 cycles (first sequence) followed by P (150 mg/m²) and G (2500 mg/m²) (second sequence) for 6 cycles. All drugs were administered on day 1, every 2 weeks, with prophylactic growth factor support. Weekly T (2 mg/kg [4 mg/kg first infusion]) was administered concomitantly with P and G in Her2+ patients. A core biopsy was performed before treatment for biologic markers assessment. Patients underwent surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant hormonal therapy according to institutional practice. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were treated. A pCR was achieved in 27 (37%) patients (32.1%, Her2- and 50%, Her2+). pCR was significantly higher in tumors that were hormonal receptor negative, poorly differentiated and positive for Ki67 and p53. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 47 patients (64.4%). Most frequent grade 3/4 hematologic and nonhematological toxicities included neutropenia (12%), nausea/vomiting (17%), and transient liver enzymes elevation (7%). One patient suffered an asymptomatic and reversible decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: These results show a highly effective regimen in terms of pCR with a good toxicity profile in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with breast cancer. The addition of trastuzumab increased pCR rate in Her2+ tumors.

Dermatomiositis en el diagnóstico del cáncer: carcinoma de mama y de vesícula biliar / Dermatomyositis in cancer diagnosis: breast and gallbladder carcinomas

La dermatomiositis (DM) es un raro síndrome paraneoplásico que se asocia al diagnóstico de diferentes tumores.Puede preceder a la enfermedad oncológica, cursar simultáneamente o incluso aparecer meses o añosdespués de la misma. Presentamos dos casos de pacientes con DM asociada a carcinoma de mama y de vesículabiliar, describiéndose los principales puntos de interés que esta entidad clínico-patológica pueda tener para eloncólogo

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome associated with different tumors. It can precedethe tumor appearance or go on simultaneously or even appear years after the tumor is diagnosed. We reporttwo cases of patients with DM associated with breast cancer and gallbladder cancer, and make a review of themain interesting points for oncologists