RESUMO
Purpose: To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes of eyes implanted with monofocal, optimized, aspheric, hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOL) following cataract surgery. Methods: The study assessed 55 eyes implanted with CT LUCIA® 621P IOLs (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) at 3-months postsurgery. The main outcome measures were refractive error, monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, and wavefront aberrations. Patients were asked to complete the Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Results: At 3 months, the cumulative Snellen visual acuity was 20/20 in 94.55% of eyes and 20/25 or better in 100%. The difference between the UDVA and CDVA was either the same (70.91%) or better (29.09%) in all eyes. The mean Snellen decimal UDVA and DCVA were 1.07 ± 0.15 and 1.13 ± 0.11, respectively. The safety and efficacy indexes were 1.48 and 1.40, respectively. 47.27% of eyes showed a spherical equivalent ±0.13 D, with 92.73% of the eyes were within ±0.50 D and all eyes were within ±1.00 D. The mean spherical equivalent was -0.03 ± 0.30 D and the mean refractive cylinder -0.36 ± 0.34 D. The log photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity functions were good and similar for all spatial frequencies. All patients reported being either fairly satisfied (score 3) or very satisfied (score 4) with their vision (mean = 3.64 ± 0.49). No intra- and postoperative complications were reported during the 3 months of follow-up. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that excellent visual and refractive outcomes, as well as patient satisfaction, can be achieved after cataract surgery with optimized, aspheric CT LUCIA 621P monofocal IOLs.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare angle-to-angle (ATA) distance and aqueous depth (AQD) readings produced by two different optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and a Scheimpflug camera. METHODS: ATA distance and AQD were measured in 60 eyes using the Visante time-domain OCT (TD-OCT) (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), the Anterion swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH), and the Pentacam HR Scheimpflug camera (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). Moreover, ATA distance was measured along the horizontal and vertical meridians. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between devices. RESULTS: All three devices did not yield similar horizontal ATA distance: 11.96 ± 0.47 mm (TD-OCT), 11.96 ± 0.42 mm (SS-OCT), and 11.05 ± 0.52 mm (Pentacam). More specifically, the Pentacam yielded significantly smaller values (approximately 0.9 mm, P < .001). Mean vertical ATA distance was 12.61 ± 0.65 and 12 ± 0.65 mm for the TD-OCT and SS-OCT, respectively (P = .983). Vertical ATA distance was significantly larger than horizontal ATA distance for both OCT devices (approximately 0.6 mm, P < .001). The lowest mean difference was found between both OCT devices (0.0068 and -0.0415 mm, for horizontal and vertical meridians, respectively) and the highest between the Pentacam and the two OCT devices (approximately 0.9 mm). As for AQD, inter-device mean values were also statistically significant: 2.89 ± 0.48, 2.82 ± 0.49, and 2.79 ± 0.50 mm, for the TD-OCT, SS-OCT, and Pentacam, respectively (P < .001). Mean differences were similar for the TD-OCT versus SS-OCT and SS-OCT versus Pentacam (approximately 0.02 mm), and larger between the TD-OCT and Pentacam (approximately 0.05 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the TD-OCT and SS-OCT are interchangeable instruments for ATA distance measurement but the Pentacam is not with either of the two OCT devices. A clinical criterion should assess whether these three devices could be used interchangeably for AQD measurement. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):133-140.].
