Devices and Techniques for Percutaneous Creation of Dialysis Arteriovenous Fistulas.

Dialysis treatment for chronic kidney disease was first developed by Dr. Willem Kolff in 1943, and its availability began to grow in 1962 after which it has become a mainstay treatment for patients with chronic kidney disease. It is estimated that, in 2021, 15% of adults in the United States (∼37 million people) have chronic kidney disease, of which 661,000 individuals have renal failure, and 468,000 individuals require dialysis. There have been several advancements in dialysis treatment since its advent, most notably the creation of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for venous access in 1966. In recent years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved two new devices for AVF creation using a percutaneous approach. These are the WavelinQ (Becton Dickinson, New Jersey) and the Ellipsys (Avenu Medical, California) endovascular AVF (endoAVF) devices that use radiofrequency and thermal technologies, respectively, to create the AVF. Since the introduction of these technologies, several studies have shown that they are safe and effective, with favorable durability and low rate of serious adverse events. In this article, we will discuss these two devices and the techniques used for percutaneous creation of dialysis AVF as an alternative to traditional open surgical techniques.

Use of multiple potency assays to evaluate human mesenchymal stromal cells.

BACKGROUND: There is broad interest in the use of cell therapies and cell products for treatment of a variety of diseases and problems. Of interest to the military, cellular therapies have the potential to confer tremendous benefit for treatment of both acute and chronic injuries. Although many different cell therapy products are currently under investigation, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are good candidates, based on their ability to respond to inflammation, limit vascular permeability, and modulate immune responses to injury. Although a large number of clinical trials utilize MSCs or their products, there is no firm consensus defining the characteristics and activities of a good MSC product. Here, we test multiple human MSCs in several assays designed to test potency, to determine if functionally relevant differences between MSCs can be defined using in vitro assays, allowing identification of superior MSC products for preclinical or clinical testing. METHODS: Human MSCs derived from several tissue sources (adipose, bone marrow, umbilical cord) were evaluated for their ability to respond to inflammatory signaling by upregulating indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase and TSG6, suppress lymphocyte proliferation, alter the polarization of macrophages, and affect tube formation by endothelial cells. RESULTS: All MSCs tested displayed activity in the functional assays utilized, but differences in potency were observed in each assay. CONCLUSION: The indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase enzyme activity assay represents a simple way to screen multiple samples. The mixed lymphocyte reaction and monocyte assays used to test interactions between MSCs and immune cells are more involved but give direct information on immunomodulation potential. The endothelial cell tube formation assay is relatively simple to perform but a large number of images must be generated and analyzed. However, it tests a functional activity other than immunomodulation and, therefore, adds another facet to MSC evaluation.