Are there differences in the adaptive profile of hair sheep and their crosses with wool breeds?

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the physiological performance of different genetic groups of sheep, by physiological variables and serum hormone levels, in a hot weather environment. Thirty sheep from five genetic groups were used: Santa Inês (SI), ½ Dorper + ½ Santa Inês (DO), ½ Ilê de France + ½ Santa Inês (IF), ½ Suffolk + ½ Santa Inês (SK), and ½ Texel + ½ Santa Inês (TX). The readings and records of physiological parameters (respiratory rate (RR), rectal temperature (RT), auricular cavity temperature (ACT), and surface temperature (ST)) were carried out at 7:00 am, 1:00 pm, and 7:00 pm, in 12 non-consecutive days. The collections of blood samples for hormone analysis (triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4), and cortisol (CORT)) is in four consecutive days. The environmental conditions of the experimental period caused a thermal discomfort in the sheep, but not a state of thermal stress. The thermolysis mechanisms, sensitive (ST and ACT) and latent (RR) processes, were enough to maintain their homeostasis (RT). The results showed that crossbred breeds presented a higher metabolism and were more efficient at dissipating heat through thermolysis than the SI breed. The crossbred breeds were efficient at dissipating heat through the elevation of body surface temperature and respiratory rate, mainly SK and TX, i.e., crossbred breeds, despite the wool cover, used thermoregulatory mechanisms that promoted lower variation of RT. The analysis of variance showed significant effects (P < 0.05) to the time factor in the responses of T4 and T3, and to the breed factor in the responses of CORT, T4, and T3. We did not observe interaction between the factors to any of the hormonal variables. Therefore, we can state that the effect of time was independent of breed and vice versa. Thyroid hormones presented lower blood concentration in the mornings (4.03 ± 0.82, T4; 65.08 ± 10.6, T3), increasing their concentration in the afternoon (4.60 ± 1.03, T4; 70.16 ± 14.17, T3). The thyroid hormones presented a normal circadian rhythm, with the exception of SK. Air temperature (AT) showed greater correlation with physiological variables than enthalpy (H) did, in the experimental conditions. However, H showed correlation with T4 and T3. The adaptive profile of the genetic groups under study are different, but the IF genetic group showed better performance under environmental conditions.

Thermal performance of a low-profile cross-ventilated freestall dairy barn with evaporative cooling pads in a hot and humid climate.

A commercial low-profile cross-ventilated system (LPCV) free-stall barn with evaporative cooling pads on the air intake side was used to assess the potential of cross-ventilation with evaporative cooling to alleviate heat stress in lactating dairy cows. A total of 5712 records (238 days × 24 h) of air temperature (AT) and relative humidity (RH) values were collected. In order to state the effectiveness of the ventilation system and potential heat stress, the temperature humidity index (THI) and enthalpy (h) were calculated outside and inside the LPCV barn. The cooling capacity of the LPCV system is greater in conditions of low humidity, and the difference between the values of the internal and external temperature reached -12 °C. The LPCV reduced exposure to heat stress, increasing the time cows spent in thermoneutral conditions. This system could reduce the occurrence of temperature above 25 °C from 33 to 5% and 11% in sections A (represents the inlet side of the barn) and D (represents the outlet side of the barn), respectively. On the other hand, the LPCV kept a high and constant rate of RH throughout the day. The average inside and outside AT were significantly different, but differences in temperature were observed across the width of the barn. Analyzing the barn by the indexes, the THI showed that the barn promoted cows more time confined under non-stressful thermal conditions (between 83.8 and 90% vs 68.7%) and stress period much lower compared to the external environment (between 10 and 16.2% vs. 31.3%). The enthalpy index showed that there was not much difference between the internal and external environments. The LPCV system is another installation alternative for raising dairy cow in a hot and humid climate.