GABA promotes gastrin-releasing peptide secretion in NE/NE-like cells: Contribution to prostate cancer progression.

In prostate cancer (PCa), neuroendocrine cells (NE) have been associated with the progression of the disease due to the secretion of neuropeptides that are capable of diffusing and influence surrounding cells. The GABAergic system is enriched in NE-like cells, and contributes to PCa progression. Additionally, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) stimulates the secretion of gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) in peripheral organs. For the first time, in this study we show the role of GABA and GABAB receptor 1 (GABBR1) expression in GRP secretion in NE-like prostate cancer cells. We demonstrated an increase in GRP levels in NE-like cell medium treated with GABAB receptor agonist. Moreover, the blocking of this receptor inhibited GABA-induced GRP secretion. The invasive potential of PC3 cells was enhanced by either GRP or conditioned medium of NE-like cells treated with GABA. Additionally, we confirmed a positive correlation between GABA and GRP levels in the serum of PCa patients with NE markers. Finally, using public available data sets, we found a negative correlation between GABBR1 and androgen receptor (AR) expression, as well as a strong positive correlation between GABBR1 and enolase 2. These results suggest that GABA via GABBR1 induces GRP secretion in NE like cells involved in PCa progression.

SFRP1 repression in prostate cancer is triggered by two different epigenetic mechanisms.

Worldwide, prostate cancer (PCa) is the second cause of death from malignant tumors among men. Establishment of aberrant epigenetic modifications, such as histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) and DNA methylation (DNAme) produce alterations of gene expression that are common in PCa. Genes of the SFRP family are tumor suppressor genes that are frequently silenced by DNA hypermethylation in many cancer types. The SFRP family is composed of 5 members (SFRP1-5) that modulate the WNT pathway, which is aberrantly activated in PCa. The expression of SFRP genes in PCa and their regulation by DNAme has been controversial. Our objective was to determine the gene expression pattern of the SFRP family in prostatic cell lines and fresh frozen tissues from normal prostates (NP), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa), by qRT-PCR, and their DNAme status by MSP and bisulfite sequencing. In prostatic cancer cell lines, the 5 SFRPs showed significantly decreased expression levels compared to a control normal prostatic cell line (p<0.0001). In agreement, SFRP1 and SFRP5 genes showed decreased expression levels in CaP fresh frozen tissues compared to NP (p<0.01), while a similar trend was observed for SFRP2. Conversely, increased levels of SFRP4 expression were found in PCa compared to BPH (p<0.01). Moreover, SFRP2, SFRP3, and SFRP5 showed DNA hypermethylation in PCa cell lines. Interestingly, we observed DNA hypermethylation at the promoter of SFRP1 in the PC3 cell line, but not in LNCaP. However, in the LNCaP cell line we found an aberrant gain of the repressive histone posttranslational modification Histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3). In conclusion, decreased expression by DNA hypermethylation of SFRP5 is a common feature of PCa, while decreased expression of SFRP1 can be due to DNA hypermethylation, but sometimes an aberrant gain of the histone mark H3K27me3 is observed instead.

Prostate cancer detection using a noninvasive method for quantifying miRNAs.

Cancer is one of the diseases with more incidence in industrialized countries. Early detection is important for patient survival in terms of treatment and clinical decisions. Several methods have been described to improve detection, diagnostic, and treatment in cancer, but the diagnostic methods are very aggressive for patients. Biopsies have been the gold standard to determine the clinical pathological characteristics of cancer tissues for many years. The biopsies procedure is very uncomfortable for the patients, and in many cases the results are negative to cancer. Therefore, patients are submitted to a second round of biopsies, because their clinical conditions implicate the presence of neoplasia. During the last years, noninvasive methods have shown relevance because they could be good indicators for cancer detection at molecular level. Molecular signatures have been included to characterize different stages of the disease, and thereby the objective is to prevent unnecessary biopsies. Several body fluids as urine, serum, blood, semen, saliva, etc. have been used. In fluids, miRNA detection provides a promising tool to obtain molecular signatures for different types of cancer. Urine represents a very good option to find molecules representative of tumor status in prostate cancer. The presence or the absence of miRNA involved in the development of the disease has been demonstrated. In this chapter we describe a method to quantify mature miRNA signatures using a noninvasive test using a body fluid such as urine.

Differential DNA methylation pattern in the A and B promoters of the progesterone receptor is associated with differential mRNA expression in the female rat hypothalamus during proestrus.

In rodents, the display of reproductive behavior occurs during the proestrus-estrus transition of the estrus cycle. This behavior is regulated by estradiol and progesterone mainly via their intracellular receptors. Two isoforms of the progesterone receptor have been described (A and B), and they have different promoters for their regulation. It has been demonstrated that the mRNA for both isoforms changes during the proestrus-estrus transition. It has been recently established that DNA methylation can be transient and cyclical in gene promoters, however, these changes have only been reported in vitro but not in physiological models. The aim of this study was to analyze the pattern of DNA methylation in the PR (A and B) promoter regions during the proestrus-estrus transition in the rat hypothalamus and its correlation with the regulation of mRNA expression. The results demonstrated a differential mRNA expression of the progesterone receptor (A and B) isoforms. The expression of total PR did not change significantly during the proestrus day, while the expression of isoform B increased significantly at 17:00 h, followed by a significant decrease at 21:00 h of the proestrus day. Interestingly, we also found that the isoform A promoter was mainly unmethylated at all studied time points. In contrast, the isoform B promoter showed a transient methylation increase during the evening of proestrus. The overall results indicate that there is a switch of progesterone receptor isoforms expression during the evening of proestrus that is related to the differential gene methylation patterns of their promoter regions, mainly for the isoform B promoter.