Validating the Body Uneasiness Test (BUT) in obese patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Body Uneasiness Test (BUT) in a large sample of subjects with obesity seeking treatment. BUT is a 71-item self-report questionnaire in two parts: BUT-A which measures weight phobia, body image concerns, avoidance, compulsive self-monitoring, detachment and estrangement feelings towards one's own body (depersonalization); and BUT-B, which looks at specific worries about particular body parts or functions. METHODS: We recruited a clinical sample of 1,812 adult subjects (age range 18-65 years, females 1,411, males 401) with obesity (Body Mass Index, BMI > or = 30 kg/m2) and a normal weight (BMI value between 18.5 and 25 kg/m2) non-clinical sample of 457 adult subjects (females 248, males 209) with an Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) score under the cut-off point 20 (scores > or = 20 indicate possible cases of eating disorders). RESULTS: The exploratory and confirmatory analyses confirmed a structural five-factor model for BUT-A and an eight-factor model for BUT-B. Internal consistency was satisfactory. Concurrent validity with Binge Eating Scale (BES) and Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) was evaluated. The authors calculated mean values for BUT scores in adult (18-65 years) patients with obesity, and evaluated the influence of gender, age and BMI. Females obtained statistically significant higher scores than males in all age groups and in all classes of obesity; patients with obesity, compared with normal weight subjects, generally obtained statistically significant higher scores, but few differences could be attributed to the influence of BMI. CONCLUSION: The BUT can be a valuable multidimensional tool for the clinical assessment of body uneasiness in obesity; the scores of its sub-scales do not show a linear correlation with BMI values.

The Body Uneasiness Test (BUT): development and validation of a new body image assessment scale.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Body Uneasiness Test (BUT), a 71-item self-report questionnaire that consists of two parts: BUT*A which measures weight phobia, body image concerns, avoidance, compulsive self-monitoring, detachment and estrangement feelings towards one's own body (depersonalization); and BUT*B which looks at specific worries about particular body parts or functions. METHODS: We recruited a clinical sample of 531 subjects (491 females) suffering from eating disorders and a general population sample of 3273 subjects (2016 females) with BMI <25 and Eating Attitudes Test-26 scores under the cut-off 20. RESULTS: The exploratory and confirmatory analyses confirmed a structural five-factor model for BUT*A and an eight-factor model for BUT*B. Internal consistency was satisfactory. The test-retest correlation coefficients were highly significant. Concurrent validity with other tests (Eating Disorder Inventory, EDI-2; Eating Attitudes Test, EAT-26; Symptom Check List, SCL-90R and Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory, SEI) was evaluated. Normative values for BUT scores in non-clinical samples of normal-weight non eating disordered subjects, from adolescence to old age, males and females, were calculated. The differences between males and females were highly significant, above all in the 18-39-age range. As for the comparison between women with eating disorders and controls, the results demonstrated a good predictive validity for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. CONCLUSIONS: The BUT is psychometrically sound. It can be a valuable tool for the screening and the clinical assessment of abnormal body image attitudes and eating disorders.

The relationship between binge eating disorder and non-purging bulimia nervosa.

AIMS: To further investigate the differentiation between non-purging bulimia nervosa (BN-NP) and binge eating disorder (BED), particularly as concerns weight-shape overconcern affecting self-esteem, a core belief to both anorexia and bulimia nervosa. METHODS: Twenty-five female subjects with BN-NP and 25 female subjects with BED, consecutively referred to the Eating Disorder Unit of the DPPhNB, were administered the BEDCI, the EDI-2 and the BUT. RESULTS: BED patients had a higher BMI (35.5 vs. 23.8 kg/m2, p<0.0001) and were slightly older than BN-NP ones. Weight-shape concerns as one of the main/the most important things influencing self-esteem were reported by 68% of BN-NP patients and 62.5% of BED ones. Age at onset of binge-eating, weight-cycling, overall impairment due to the eating behavior, sexual harassment, depressive and substance abuse comorbidity were equally represented in the two groups of patients. BN-NP patients scored higher than BED ones as regards EDI drive for thinness (p<0.05) and BUT weight phobia (p<0.05), with these scores significantly related to differences in BMI (p<0.0005 and p=0.012). Weight-shape overconcern influencing self-esteem was predictive of an earlier onset of binge-eating (p<0.05) and higher scores at the BUT weight phobia, and body image concerns (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Differences between BED and BN-NP seem to be more of degree than type and there seems little value in the separation between BED and BN-NP based on weight-shape concerns that substantially impair self-esteem. This construct seems core to both disorders and plays a substantial role in triggering and maintaining the binge-eating cycle.

Affective temperament in the eating disorders.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigate the affective temperamental characteristics in a sample of ED (eating disorder) patients. METHODS: 49 ED patients diagnosed by the SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV), were divided into two groups on the basis of the presence or absence of Binge Eating (restricting-anorexia nervosa [R-AN]= 16; Binge Eaters= 33). All patients were administered the TEMPS-I (Temperament Evaluation Memphis Pisa Semistructured - Interview), to assess affective temperament. A third group of controls (N= 1010), derived from a study with the TEMPS-I on normal subjects, was included for comparison. RESULTS: A full affective temperament was not found in patients of the restricting group. By contrast 24% of the binge eating group had a full affective temperament of one of three types. Comparing the three temperaments for the three groups, only cyclothymic temperament proved to be significant, with higher levels in the binge eating group (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, people with R-AN do not show a full affective temperament. However, people with binge eating, had depressive and hyperthymic temperament, and displayed higher level of cyclothymic temperament than the normal population. The findings of this study add to a growing literature on temperament in people with ED; particularly, they add to the view that may be various paths leading to R-AN, and these may differ from those of binge eating.

Comparisons of men with full or partial eating disorders, men without eating disorders, and women with eating disorders in the community.

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared 62 men who met all or most of the DSM-III-R criteria for eating disorders with 212 women who had similar eating disorders and 3,769 men who had no eating disorders on a wide variety of clinical and historical variables. METHOD: The groups of subjects were derived from a community epidemiologic survey performed in the province of Ontario that used the World Health Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview. RESULTS: Men with eating disorders were very similar to women with eating disorders on most variables. Men with eating disorders showed higher rates of psychiatric comorbidity and more psychosocial morbidity than men without eating disorders. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the clinical similarities between men with eating disorders and women with eating disorders. They also reveal that both groups suffer similar psychosocial morbidity. Men with eating disorders show a wide range of differences from men without eating disorders; the extent to which these differences are effects of the illness or possible risk factors for the occurrence of these illnesses in men is not clear.

The eating attitudes test: twenty-five years later.

This manuscript reviews the literature involved with the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT), first developed in the late 1970s as a self-report, indicative of the symptoms of eating disorders. The EAT has good psychometric properties of reliability and validity, and reasonable sensitivity and specificity for the eating disorders, but very low positive predictive value because eating disorders are relatively uncommon. In addition they exist on a continuum, because of denial and social desirability, the results of a self-report instrument may be affected. A very large literature has documented the use of the EAT in a variety of cultures. It is used to screen eating disturbances in general as the first part of a two-part diagnostic screen, as an ability to compare across groups and to measure change between groups and over time.

Predictors of success and satisfaction in the practice of psychiatry: a preliminary follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the predictors of psychiatrists' perceived success and personal satisfaction with their careers. The present study examines self-reported success and personal satisfaction with their careers in a cohort of psychiatrists followed for more than 20 years. METHODS: A total of 29 psychiatrists, all of whom had participated in a study during their residency 21 to 24 years earlier, completed a self-report questionnaire. The first set of questions addressed the type and characteristics of their professional practice; the second set assessed aspects of their nonprofessional practice; and the third set assessed aspects of their nonprofessional, personal lifestyles. The personality traits of neuroticism and extraversion were assessed during the residency years and were used as predictors. Composite measures of self-perceived external success and personal satisfaction were computed. Regression models were constructed to determine the best predictors of these composite measures. RESULTS: Neuroticism proved to be a significant predictor of external success but not of personal satisfaction, with higher scores predicting a lower rating of perceived external success. There were 2 practice characteristics--involvement with research and practising from an orientation other than psychoanalytic--that predicted perception of success. One personal lifestyle characteristic--the perception that one's nonprofessional life sustained professional life--also predicted perception of success. The best predictor of personal satisfaction was overall satisfaction with nonprofessional aspects of life. CONCLUSIONS: Personality, nonprofessional social support, and engaging in research are associated with greater perceived success and personal satisfaction with a career in psychiatry.

Charismatic leadership, boundary issues, and collusion.

The authors suggest that a charismatic leadership style has an impact on the maintenance of boundaries and standards of practice within a department of psychiatry. They also underline the need for all members of a self-regulated professional group to assume responsibility for the maintenance of standards within the group. An overview of leadership tasks and styles, with particular emphasis on the qualities of charismatic leadership, is provided, and the impacts of boundary violations committed by members of a psychiatric department or institute on the integrity of the professional group are also elaborated. The authors then develop several hypotheses regarding the phenomenon of emotional collusion that occurs in departments in which a charismatic leader becomes sexually involved with patients. The individual internal psychological mechanisms and companion group dynamics that may allow the leader to be supported at the cost of ethical standards, principles of practice, and the ultimate creativity and viability of the group are then discussed. The authors conclude that the maintenance of standards within a self-regulating professional group must be the shared responsibility of all members. The example of boundary violations by a charismatic leader is used to illustrate the need for open debate regarding fundamental principles required to maintain a healthy functioning of critical checks and balances within the psychiatric profession.

Psychiatry in the new millennium.

The field of psychiatry is experiencing great excitement at this time, much as it was 100 years ago. Current excitement is rooted in the greatly strengthened therapeutics, new models for understanding, and an exponential increase in knowledge of brain function as well as in the opportunity to revise health care delivery. While public expectations of professionals have generally fallen, the role of the healer, which is at the heart of psychiatric practice, has remained high in public regard. Psychiatry has also had to develop new relationships with an active consumer movement. Consumers now appropriately expect to be part of the planning, governance, and evaluation of care. Patients are questioning the research agenda and demand a role in determining the conduct of investigations. This active consumer movement is playing an important role in destigmatizing mental illnesses. Newer, nonmoralistic theories about mental illness and the profession's emphasis on the public trust have also played an important role. The increasing closeness of psychiatry to the rest of medicine has had a greatly beneficial impact, not only on stigma but also on diagnosis and treatment. Care must be taken, however, to see that diagnosis does not become a means to avoiding understanding of people. A welcome recent change has been the reunion between psychiatry and the addictions. This reunion has been facilitated by the development of multifactorial models of care in the mental health field and harm-reduction strategies in the addictions. This bodes well for more integrated treatment in the coming years. The strong psychiatric treatments that are now available and those on the horizon also auger well for an exciting period in our field. The excitement is enhanced by recognizing the multiple approaches to care that have been demonstrated to be effective and the need for great investment in research in this country and by developing new partnerships between the profession and public.

Difficulties in treating patients with eating disorders: a review of patient and clinician variables.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with eating disorders (EDs) are often difficult to treat. Despite recent advances in treatment, a significant percentage of patients remain treatment refractory. This paper reviews variables that contribute to these difficulties and recent strategies that focus on increasing patient motivation for treatment. METHOD: The authors relate their clinical experience and synthesize the literature examining aspects of patients with EDs that may contribute to their treatment resistance and therapist variables that may contribute to negative nontherapeutic reactions. RESULTS: Patient variables include the nature of the symptoms that patients experience, issues of trust, the not uncommon failure of ambulatory treatments, and issues related to comorbidity. Aspects of clinicians include lack of understanding of the biopsychosocial pathophysiology of these conditions and lack of experience and appreciation for the countertransferential reactions that these patients evoke in caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Improving understanding of the reasons for treatment refractoriness in patients with EDs is critical to improving their care. New interventions aimed at enhancing motivation may facilitate this process.

Development and testing of a new hostility scale.

Evidence suggests that assessment of global type A behaviour as a coronary risk factor may not be the most fruitful strategy because some components, particularly hostility, may be more harmful than others. Measurement of hostility has been primarily through two types of instrumentation: the Type A Structured Interview (SI) and the Cook-Medley (Ho) scale. Deficiencies in the measurement of hostility have resulted from a lack of conceptual clarity because definitions of hostility have been blurred by overlap with the concepts of anger and aggression. The main objective of this study was to develop and test an instrument that focuses hostility on attitude rather than emotion or behaviour. Psychometric properties of the Hostile Attitude Scale (HAS) were Cronbach's alpha, 0.80, and correlation of 0.56 with the Ho scale and 0.43 with the SI. In a clinical investigation that used the HAS, SI and Ho scale, all measures were significantly correlated with angiogram outcome, although the strongest relationship was with the HAS. Hostile attitude alone (HAS) accounted for 6% of explained variance in angiogram outcome based on regression analysis. The HAS is offered as a short, easily administered measure of hostility, with particular emphasis on cognitive aspects of the construct.

The effects of the ideal of female beauty on mood and body satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: The present study examined changes in women's mood states resulting from their viewing pictures in fashion magazines of models who represent a thin ideal. METHOD: Female university students completed the Profile of Mood States (POMS), the Body Parts Satisfaction Scale (BPSS), and the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI). They were then exposed to 20 slides; the experimental group (N = 51) viewed images of female fashion models and a control group (N = 67) viewed slides containing no human figures. All subjects then completed the POMS and the BPSS again. RESULTS: Women were more depressed (R2 = 0.745, p < .05) and more angry (R2 = 0.73, p < .01) following exposure to slides of female fashion models. DISCUSSION: Viewing images of female fashion models had an immediate negative effect on women's mood. This study, therefore, supports the hypothesis that media images do play a role in disordered eating.

A randomized controlled trial of guided imagery in bulimia nervosa.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to test a guided imagery therapy designed to enhance self-comforting in bulimia nervosa. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial compared 6 weeks of individual guided imagery therapy with a control group. Fifty participants who met DSM-III-R criteria for bulimia nervosa completed the study. Measures of eating disorder symptoms, psychological functioning and the experience of guided imagery therapy were administered. RESULTS: The guided imagery treatment had substantial effects on the reduction of bingeing and purging episodes; the imagery group had a mean reduction of binges of 74% and of vomiting of 73%. The imagery treatment also demonstrated improvement on measures of attitudes concerning eating, dieting and body weight in comparison to the control group. In addition, the guided imagery demonstrated improvement on psychological measures of aloneness and the ability for self-comforting. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from this study suggests that guided imagery was an effective treatment for bulimia nervosa, at least in the short-term.

Specificity of eating disorders diagnoses in families of probands with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.

This study examines the prevalence of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in relatives of probands, and examines the probandwise specificity of any familial clustering. Data were collected from probands using the family history method. Probands were recruited in a sequential cohort fashion. Information collected from probands was rated semiblindly by two of the authors, and a diagnostic hierarchy applied to arrive at a diagnosis for each of the relatives assessed. Data are reported on 2,125 family members, collected from 93 probands. Diagnostic agreement between raters was high, with serious disagreement present in three of 167 possible cases of an eating disorder. Rates of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, major depression, and substance abuse declined from first- to third-degree relatives, which is consistent with genetic clustering, and there was evidence of a cohort effect operating for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. The rates of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in all family members were 5.1%, and 4.3% respectively. An analysis of maternal and paternal descent showed no evidence for X-linked dominant transmission in these families. Preliminary analysis of the clustering of diagnoses in relatives showed a tendency (chi 2 = 14.47, P = .006) for family members to be affected by the same diagnosis as was the proband. This trend was strongest for anorexia nervosa, but there was overlap when the proband had a lifetime diagnosis of bulimia nervosa, with or without anorexia nervosa. These results are compatible with the existence of genetic factors influencing predisposition to eating disorders, but do not prove such.