Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Clearance May Predict Treatment Response in Neoadjuvant Colorectal Cancer Management.

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is extracellular DNA released by tumors and has been proposed as a marker of residual disease as well as a predictor of disease recurrence in the adjuvant setting. However, data are lacking on the utility of this biomarker in the neoadjuvant setting. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of stage III and IV colorectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment at a single institution. Results: Seventeen patients converted from a positive pre-neoadjuvant ctDNA to a negative ctDNA prior to surgery. Five patients remained persistently positive despite systemic treatment. ctDNA conversion was found to be associated with a higher incidence of favorable treatment effect scores on final surgical pathology. There was no difference in recurrence-free survival in this small population. Furthermore, no added benefit was identified for patients receiving additional neoadjuvant therapy after the time of positive to negative ctDNA conversion. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential utility of ctDNA and the need for prospective trials in the neoadjuvant setting to monitor treatment response and guide decisions on treatment duration.

Prophylactic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Patients at High Risk of Developing Gallbladder Cancer Peritoneal Metastases: Case Report and Rationale for a Prospective Clinical Trial.

Gallbladder cancer is a devastating disease with a 5-year survival of only 18%. The majority of gallbladder cancers are discovered incidentally in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. During non-oncologic laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease, gallbladder perforation occurs in 29% of cases and spillage of gallstones occurs in 9% of cases. Patients with gallbladder cancer frequently develop peritoneal recurrence, particularly after intra-operative bile spillage during cholecystectomy for incidental gallbladder cancer. The high likelihood of spillage and peritoneal seeding during cholecystectomy for incidental gallbladder cancer suggests the need for prophylactic strategies to prevent peritoneal carcinomatosis. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has efficacy in gallbladder cancer patients with macroscopic peritoneal disease undergoing cytoreductive surgery and has been associated with a survival advantage in a multi-institutional retrospective case series. However, the utilization of HIPEC with a prophylactic intent against the development of peritoneal disease following resection of gallbladder cancer has not yet been prospectively studied. Here, we review the literature surrounding gallbladder cancer and HIPEC, report an institutional experience utilizing prophylactic HIPEC, and discuss a recently proposed prospective clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic HIPEC in the prevention of gallbladder peritoneal metastasis.

Exploring the Genomic Landscape of Hepatobiliary Cancers to Establish a Novel Molecular Classification System.

Taxonomy of hepatobiliary cancer (HBC) categorizes tumors by location or histopathology (tissue of origin, TO). Tumors originating from different TOs can also be grouped by overlapping genomic alterations (GA) into molecular subtypes (MS). The aim of this study was to create novel HBC MSs. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) data from the AACR-GENIE database were used to examine the genomic landscape of HBCs. Machine learning and gene enrichment analysis identified MSs and their oncogenomic pathways. Descriptive statistics were used to compare subtypes and their associations with clinical and molecular variables. Integrative analyses generated three MSs with different oncogenomic pathways independent of TO (n = 324; p < 0.05). HC-1 "hyper-mutated-proliferative state" MS had rapidly dividing cells susceptible to chemotherapy; HC-2 "adaptive stem cell-cellular senescence" MS had epigenomic alterations to evade immune system and treatment-resistant mechanisms; HC-3 "metabolic-stress pathway" MS had metabolic alterations. The discovery of HBC MSs is the initial step in cancer taxonomy evolution and the incorporation of genomic profiling into the TNM system. The goal is the development of a precision oncology machine learning algorithm to guide treatment planning and improve HBC outcomes. Future studies should validate findings of this study, incorporate clinical outcomes, and compare the MS classification to the AJCC 8th staging system.

Omission of Completion Lymph Node Dissection in Sentinel Node Biopsy Positive Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies evaluating patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB+) show no melanoma-specific survival difference between patients undergoing lymph node basin surveillance and completion lymph node dissection (CLND). This has been broadly applied, despite underrepresentation of head and neck (HN) cutaneous melanoma patients. We evaluated whether this was upheld in the HN melanoma cohort. METHODS: Patients with HN melanoma with a SLNB+ were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2012 to 2019. Overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent SLNB only versus SLNB + CLND were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed based on pathologic N (pN) and receipt of immunotherapy. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Analysis of 634 patients with multivariable Cox regression showed no difference in OS in SLNB only versus SLNB + CLND cohorts (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.81; p = 0.610). Charlson-Deyo score (CDS) 1 versus 0 (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.10-2.63; p = 0.016), pN2+ versus pN1 (HR 1.74; 95% CI 1.23-2.45; p = 0.002), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) versus no (HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.34-3.19; p = 0.001) were associated with worse prognosis. Subgroup analysis by pN showed no OS benefit for CLND in either pN1 (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.51-2.10; p = 0.922) or pN2+ (HR 1.31; 95% CI 0.67-2.57; p = 0.427) patients or in patients who received immunotherapy (HR 1.32; 95% CI 0.54-3.22; p = 0.549). CONCLUSIONS: This study of SLNB + HN melanoma patients showed no OS difference in SLNB only versus SLNB + CLND. Further studies need to be performed to better define the role of CLND.

Age-related next-generation sequencing mutational analysis in 1196 melanomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Melanoma mutational burden is high and approximately 50% have oncogenic mutations in BRAF. We sought to evaluate age-related mutational differences in melanoma. METHODS: We analyzed melanoma samples in the Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange database. Targetable mutations were identified using the Precision Oncology Knowledge Base (OncoKB). RESULTS: We found 1194 patients with a common set of 30 genes. The top mutated genes in patients <40 years old (y/o) (n = 98) were BRAF (59%), TP53 (31%), NRAS (17%), and PTEN (14%); in 40-59 y/o (n = 354) were BRAF (51%), NRAS (30%), TP53 (26%), and APC (13%); and in ≥60 y/o (n = 742) were BRAF (38%), NRAS (33%), TP53 (26%), and KDR (19%). BRAF mutations were almost mutually exclusive from NRAS mutations in <40 y/o (58/59). Mutational burden increased with age, with means of 2.39, 2.92, and 3.67 mutations per sample in patients <40, 40-59, and ≥60 y/o, respectively (p < 0.0001). There were 10 targetable mutations meeting OncoKB criteria for melanoma: BRAF (level 1), RET (level 1), KIT (level 2), NRAS (level 3A), TP53 (level 3A), and FGFR2, MET, PTEN, PIK3CA, and KRAS (level 4). CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in melanoma have age-related differences and demonstrates potential targetable mutations for personalized therapies.

Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Selecting frail elderly patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) for pancreas resection using biologic age has not been elucidated. This study determined the feasibility of the deficit accumulation frailty index (DAFI) in identifying such patients and its association with surgical outcomes. METHODS: The DAFI, which assesses frailty based on biologic age, was used to identify frail patients using clinical and health-related quality-of-life data. The characteristics of frail and nonfrail patients were compared. RESULTS: Of 242 patients (median age, 75.5 years), 61.2% were frail and 32.6% had undergone pancreas resection (surgery group). Median overall survival (mOS) decreased in frail patients (7.13 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.65-10.1) compared with nonfrail patients (16.1 months, 95% CI: 11.47-34.40, p = 0.001). In the surgery group, mOS improved in the nonfrail patients (49.4%; 49.2 months, 95% CI: 29.3-79.9) compared with frail patients (50.6%, 22.1 months, 95% CI: 18.3-52.4, p = 0.10). In the no-surgery group, mOS was better in nonfrail patients (54%; 10.81 months, CI 7.85-16.03) compared with frail patients (66%; 5.45 months, 95% CI: 4.34-7.03, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The DAFI identified elderly patients with PC at risk of poor outcomes and can identify patients who can tolerate more aggressive treatments.

Disparities in the impact of the AJCC 8th edition staging system on differentiated thyroid cancer outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The impact of AJCC8 among self-reported racial/ethnic groups on differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) outcomes is unknown. METHODS: Multivariate-regression evaluated the association between AJCC7 to AJCC8 stage change and race/ethnicity in patients with DTC in the NCDB. Cox-proportional-regression evaluated whether AJCC7 to AJCC8 stage change affects overall survival (OS) differently based on reported race/ethnicity. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, Hispanics and Asian-Pacific-Islanders (APIs) were 27% and 12% less likely to be down-staged compared to white-non-Hispanics (WNHs) (p < 0.001); black-non-Hispanics (BNHs) had no significant down-staging difference. Down-staged patients had an increased risk of death compared to patients with unchanged staging, regardless of race/ethnicity. However, based on two-way interaction, the magnitude of this negative change on survival from down-staging was only different between WNHs (HR = 2.64) and BNHs (HR = 1.77), (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome disparities persist among self-reported racial/ethnic groups with AJCC8. Down-staged patients across all racial/ethnic groups had decreased survival compared to those with unchanged stage, with the least impact in BNHs.

Current and future imaging modalities in gastric cancer.

Gastric adenocarcinoma treatment can include endoscopic mucosal resection, surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and palliative measures depending on staging. Both invasive and noninvasive staging techniques have been used to dictate the best treatment pathway. Here, we review the current imaging modalities used in gastric cancer as well as novel techniques to accurately stage and screen these patients.

"The Benefit Of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography In Stage I And Stage II Melanomas With High-Risk Decisiondx-Melanoma Scores".

INTRODUCTION: Early detection of melanoma is instrumental as the 5-year survival decreases from 93.3% to <50% when metastases are present.1-3 Distinguishing which patients require closer follow-up can be difficult for melanoma patients. Developments by Castle Biosciences' (Friendswood, TX) DecisionDx-Melanoma (DDx-M) use 31 melanoma associated genes to stratify melanomas into 4 classes with 1A having lowest risk of morbidity and mortality and 2B the highest.5 We assessed the benefit of providing additional 18FDG-PET-CT and brain MRI to genetically high-risk patients who may have otherwise been overlooked. METHODS: 297 patients at our institution had biopsies sent for DDx-M between 2014 and 2021. Patients found to have Class 2 melanomas received additional screening with yearly 18FDG-PET-CT scans and brain MRIs. Patients with Class 2 DDx-M scores and negative SLNB were included in the study. 66 met inclusion criteria and received imaging. RESULTS: Within 3 years of follow-up, 8/66 (12.1%) patients had metastases detected by 18FDG-PET-CT scans. No patients with stage IA or IB went on to develop metastases. DISCUSSION: 18FDG-PET-CT scans detect metastases in < 3% of the time when all stage I and II patients are scanned; however, by using DDx-M in our screening protocols, we achieved a detection rate of 12.1%.6,7 These patients went on to receive treatment and would have otherwise progressed undetected, leading to higher morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: We suggest all patients with initial stage II or above melanomas receive a DDx-M score and those with class 2 receive yearly 18FDG-PET-CT/brain MRI imaging.

Timing of Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Recurrent Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) with peritoneal involvement is a common indication for cytoreductive surgery with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). With peritoneal recurrence, patients are increasingly being offered repeat CRS/HIPECs, however optimal timing for a second CRS/HIPEC remains unknown. METHODS: A prospectively maintained 30-year database at our high-volume HIPEC center was analyzed retrospectively for patients with LAMNs and peritoneal recurrence receiving one or two CRS/HIPECs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, linear regression modeling, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 143 patients with LAMNs who underwent CRS/HIPECs had confirmed postoperative peritoneal recurrence. Of these patients, 85 underwent one CRS/HIPEC and 58 underwent two CRS/HIPECs. The groups had significant differences in age, with younger patients more likely to undergo a second CRS/HIPEC (48.5 vs. 58.0 years; p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) for the group undergoing two CRS/HIPECs was approximately four times longer compared with the group undergoing one CRS/HIPEC (227.1 vs. 54.5 months; p < 0.0001). The time from recurrence to the second CRS/HIPEC was not significantly associated with OS from the time of the first operation. Instead, a shorter time between the first CRS/HIPEC and recurrence was significantly associated with shorter OS from the time of the first operation (p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: In peritoneal LAMNs with recurrence, receiving two CRS/HIPECs was associated with better OS compared with receiving one CRS/HIPEC. Longer time to recurrence was a good prognostic factor. Delay between recurrence and second CRS/HIPEC had no apparent impact on OS from the first CRS/HIPEC; thus, immediate or delayed reoperative intervention are both reasonable approaches.

Establishing Novel Molecular Subtypes of Appendiceal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Appendiceal cancer is a rare disease process with complex treatment strategies. The objective of this study was to identify mutation-based genetic subtypes that may differ from the current histological classification, compare the genetic make-up of primaries and metastases, and find novel targetable alterations. METHODS: The analyses involved the curation and normalization of gene mutation panels from appendiceal adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 196) stored in the AACR GENIE Database v6.0. Genes mutated in less than one patient and tumors profiled with incomplete mutation panels were excluded from the study. The optimal number of AC subtypes was established using the Nonnegative Matrix Factorization algorithm. Statistical comparisons of mutation frequencies were performed using Pearson's χ2 test. RESULTS: AC patients were stratified into five mutation subtypes, based on a final set of 41 cancer-related genes. AC0 had no mutations. The most frequently mutated genes varied between the subtypes were: AC1: KRAS (91.9%) and GNAS (77.4%); AC2: KRAS (52.5%), APC (32.5%), and GNAS (30%); AC3: KMT2D (38.7%), TP53 (38.7%), KRAS (35.5%), EP300 (22.6%); and AC4: TP53 (97.2%), KRAS (77.8%), and SMAD4 (36.1%). Additionally, AC3 was less likely to be mucinous (22.6% vs. 50.0-74.2%, p < 0.001) and had a higher mutation frequency (3.6 vs. 0-3.1, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between primary tumors and metastases in the 41 assessed genes (p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: The characterization of these subtypes suggests a need for molecular approaches to complement anatomical and histopathological staging for AC. A prospective comparison of subtype prognosis and response to surgery and adjuvant treatment is needed to identify the clinical applications of the novel molecular subtypes.

Misdiagnosis of appendiceal neoplasms as ovarian tumors: Impact of prior gynecologic surgery on definitive cytoreduction and HIPEC.

BACKGROUND: Female patients with pelvic/adnexal masses often undergo gynecologic operations due to presumed ovarian origin. The diagnosis of an appendiceal tumor is often only made postoperatively after suboptimal cytoreduction has been performed. We hypothesized that an index gynecological procedure increases the morbidity of definitive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) in patients with appendiceal mucinous tumors. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed to identify female patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal tumors from 2012 to 2020. RESULTS: During the 8-year period, CRS/HIPEC was performed in 36 female patients with appendiceal mucinous tumors. Eighteen patients (50.0%) had received a prior pelvic operation by gynecologists (PPO Group) for presumed ovarian origin before referral for definitive CRS/HIPEC. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was higher in the PPO group (21 vs. 9, p = 0.04). The median number of days from gynecologic procedure to definitive CRS/HIPEC was 169 days. Compared to patients who did not undergo a prior gynecologic operation, those in the PPO group had higher intraoperative blood loss (650 vs 100 mL, p < 0.01) during CRS/HIPEC as well as longer length of stay (12 vs 8 days, p = 0.02) and higher overall morbidity (72.3% vs 33.3%, p = 0.02). After controlling for PCI, prior gynecologic operation increased risk of 30-day morbidity after definitive CRS/HIPEC (OR 11.6, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A multi-disciplinary approach is needed for the primary evaluation of patients with pelvic masses of undetermined origin. A gynecological resection is associated with increased morbidity during definitive cytoreduction and HIPEC for appendiceal mucinous tumors.

Prognostic Impact and Utility of Immunoprofiling in the Selection of Patients with Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis for Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC).

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown an association in non-metastatic colorectal cancer between patient survival and immunoprofiling (expression of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45, and FOXP3 T cells at the invasive margin (IM) and the tumor center (TC)) regardless of stage. Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis have a dismal prognosis, but survival can be significantly improved in selected patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). However, current patient selection for CRS/HIPEC is suboptimal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate immune profiles of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and their correlation with overall survival (OS). METHODS: The study cohort included patients from a prospectively maintained database of adults with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent CRS/HIPEC. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using antibodies to CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RO, and FOXP3 T cells was performed. IHC image density was calculated using ImageJ software, and an immunoscore was determined. RESULTS: Eighty tumors were evaluated from 66 patients. These included 14 primary sites and 66 metastatic sites. R0/R1 resection was achieved in 44 (66.7%) patients. Known prognostic factors including resection status (HR 1.99, p = 0.004) and lymph node status (HR 3.49, p = 0.002) were associated with overall survival. On multivariate analysis, increased CD3/CD4 IM (HR 0.54, p = 0.03) ratio positively was associated with improved OS. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to assess the utility of subtypes of T cells as prognostic markers in patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis, which may play a role in patients with low-volume disease. Further studies into immune mechanisms may improve patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC as well as provide novel pathways for effective immunotherapy.

Delay in surgery is associated with axillary upstaging of clinically node negative breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most breast cancer (BC) patients present with early disease and clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0). Timing of surgery has not been standardized. We hypothesized that surgical delay results in an increased likelihood of nodal metastasis. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with cN0 BC undergoing surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy as initial therapy between 2006 and 2014 were identified in the NCDB and divided into four groups based on time intervals between diagnosis and surgery (<4 weeks, 4-8 weeks, 8-12 weeks, and >12 weeks). Regression analysis evaluated the independent impact of surgical timing on axillary upstaging and survival. RESULTS: Of 355,443 patients with cN0 BC, 39.6% had surgery within 4 weeks and 5.4% more than 12 weeks from diagnosis. After controlling for relevant factors, a month delay in surgery was associated with an increased likelihood of nodal positivity (odds ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.05; p < .001) and decreased overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.04; p < .001). When compared to patients who underwent surgery less than 4 weeks from diagnosis, the absolute increase in nodal positivity and relative risks were 5.3% (95% CI: 0.047-0.059) and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.30-1.38), respectively, in the more than 12 weeks group. CONCLUSIONS: Delay in BC surgery in cN0 patients was associated with an increased likelihood of axillary upstaging and decreased survival.

Inaccurate pretreatment staging can impact survival in early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Given the survival advantage of neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, accurate clinical staging is necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical (c) and pathologic (p) staging concordance rates for presumably early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma patients that had upfront esophagectomy (UFE) and evaluate if survival (OS) was negatively affected by inaccurate preoperative staging and subsequent treatment selection. METHODS: An NCDB retrospective review of nonmetastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma patients that had UFE. The rates of concordance between c and p staging system and OS were calculated. RESULTS: Of 2775 patients, most patients presented with cN0 (82.8%) and cT1 tumors (53.6%). The overall concordance between c and p staging was 78.8% for T-classification (moderate agreement; weighted κ = 0.729; P < .001) and 78.8% for N-classification (weak agreement; weighted κ = 0.448; P < .001). Patients that were upstaged due to a lack of concordance between T-classification had decreased 5- and 10-year OS (30% and 16%, P < .001) and those upstaged due to discordant N-classification had decreased 5- and 10-year OS (28% and 23%, P < .001)." CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative staging of esophageal adenocarcinoma has moderate reliability and accuracy for predicting pT and pN classification. Up to 25% of patients have discordant clinical and pathological staging, which impacts OS.

Effects of a More Restrictive Transfusion Trigger in Trauma Patients.

Since the Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care trial, studies have shown that acutely ill patients can drift as a low as 5 g/dL. This study reviews a transfusion trigger change to 6.5 g/dL, which we hypothesize will conserve resources and improve quality of care. This is a retrospective chart review at an urban Level I trauma center from January through December 2015 after our trauma service changed the transfusion trigger from 7 to 6.5 g/dL. Outcomes in patients before (TT7) and after (TT6.5) the change in transfusion threshold were then compared. One hundred thirty-one discrete patients were included in this trial, with 285 instances of a hemoglobin of 7 g/dL or less and 178 transfusions. Seventy-two patients were before the change in threshold and 59 after. There was no change in length of hospital stay, ICU stay, ventilator days, mortality, and organ system failure after change in the transfusion threshold. After initiation of a more conservative threshold, 72 units of blood were saved. Decreased transfusion threshold was associated with no worse outcomes associated with decreased resource utilization.

Changing Trends in Industry Funding for Surgical Oncologists.

BACKGROUND: With reductions in public funding, alternate research funding is essential to surgical oncologists (SOs). We aimed to examine current trends in industry funding of SOs. METHODS: Society of Surgical Oncology surgeons were identified and matched with board certification and years in practice. Departmental and hospital data were evaluated, and industry payments from 2013 to 2017 were matched with the Open Payment Data. RESULTS: Of the 1670 SOs identified, 922 (55%) had academic positions: 588 (64%) males and 334 (36%) females. Between 2013 and 2017, research payments totaling $46,596,706 were made to 162 SOs (17.5%): $40,774,716 (87%) for research related to drugs and clinical trials, compared with $5,194,199 (11%) for surgical devices (p = 0.018). Funding correlated with academic leadership and years in practice (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0037). Massachusetts ($9,060,976), Texas ($7,656,228), and New York ($4,210,864) received the most funding, whereas Utah ($1,533,166/SO), Massachusetts ($1,294,425/SO), and Oregon ($1,241,702/SO) received the highest average payments per SO. The majority of funding was from Novartis ($16,045,608), Amgen ($6,810,832), and Merck ($3,758,299), for an oncolytic vaccine (talimogene laherparepvec, $5,939,007), a BRAF inhibitor (dabrafenib, $5,727,309), and a KIT inhibitor (imatinib, $4,323,586). Male SOs received funding more frequently than females (120/588 [20%] vs. 42/334 [12.6%]; p = 0.0027). Males also received more general payments (travel/lodging, food/beverage, consulting/speaker fees): $48,830 vs. $11,867 per male and female, respectively (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of industry research payments to SOs are related to novel pharmaceuticals, which highlights the expanding influence SOs play in systemic therapies. Industry payments are influenced by location, gender, and academic leadership.