Kinematics of a highly congruent mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis.

PURPOSE: Limited or absent axial rotation of the mobile insert of total knee prostheses could lead to high contact stresses and stresses at the bone-implant interface, which in turn might lead to implant loosening. The aim of this study was to assess knee kinematics and muscle activation and their possible change over time in patients with a highly congruent, mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis. METHODS: A prospective series of 11 rheumatoid arthritis patients was included to participate in this fluoroscopic and EMG study; only 7 patients completed the study. Kinematic evaluations took place 7 months, 1 and 2 years post-operatively. Repeated measurements ANOVA and linear mixed-effects model for longitudinal data were used to compare the differences between the follow-ups. RESULTS: There are no significant changes in axial rotations between follow-up moments for the femoral component as well as the mobile insert. The insert remained mobile and followed the femoral component from 0° until approximately 60° of knee flexion. Diverging and reversed axial rotations and translations were seen during the dynamic motions. CONCLUSIONS: Knee kinematics and muscle activation do not appear to change in the first 2 post-operative years. Reversed and divergent axial rotations with increasing knee flexion indicate that as soon as the congruency decreases, the femoral component is no longer forced in a certain position by the insert and moves to a self-imposed position. At lower knee flexion angles, the femoral component might be obstructed by the highly congruent insert and therefore might not be able to move freely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV.

Kinematics and early migration in single-radius mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee prostheses.

BACKGROUND: The mobile-bearing variant of a single-radius design is assumed to provide more freedom of motion compared to the fixed-bearing variant because the insert does not restrict the natural movements of the femoral component. This would reduce the contact stresses and wear which in turn may have a positive effect on the fixation of the prosthesis to the bone and thereby decreases the risk for loosening. The aim of this study was to evaluate early migration of the tibial component and kinematics of a mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis of the same single-radius design. METHODS: Twenty Triathlon single-radius posterior-stabilized knee prostheses were implanted (9 mobile-bearing and 11 fixed-bearing). Fluoroscopy and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) were performed 6 and 12 months post-operatively. FINDINGS: The 1 year post-operative RSA results showed considerable early migrations in 3 out of 9 mobile-bearing patients and 1 out of 11 fixed-bearing patients. The range of knee flexion was the same for the mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing group. The mobile insert was following the femoral component during motion. INTERPRETATION: Despite the mobile insert following the femoral component during motion, and therefore performing as intended, no kinematic advantages of the mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis were seen. The fixed-bearing knee performed as good as the mobile-bearing knee and maybe even slightly better based on less irregular kinematics and less early migrations.

Mobile bearing knee kinematics change over time. A fluoroscopic study in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

BACKGROUND: In a previous fluoroscopy study the motion of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis was evaluated. That study showed that the axial rotation of the insert was limited. Three possible explanations are given for the limited rotation: low conformity between the femoral component and insert, the fixed anterior position of the insert-tibia pivot point leading to impingement and fibrous tissue formation. While the effect of the conformity on the axial rotation will not change over time, the effect of impingement and fibrous tissue is likely to increase, and thereby further decreasing the axial rotation. METHODS: In order to accurately assess changes in axial rotation over time in a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis rheumatoid arthritis patient group, patients were evaluated 8 months and 3 years postoperatively using fluoroscopy. FINDINGS: In comparison with the 8 months evaluation, the rotation of the femoral component (range: -10.8 degrees to 2.8 degrees) and the insert (range: -5.9 degrees to 1.4 degrees) were further limited at 3 years (respectively, -5.9 degrees to 4.9 degrees and -2.8 degrees to 5.4 degrees). Patterns of axial rotation for the femoral component and insert varied considerably between the trials within patients while at the 8 months evaluation no significant difference within patients was observed. INTERPRETATION: This study shows the importance of re-evaluating knee kinematics over time. The axial rotation of both the femoral component as the insert decreased over time, indicating a kinematic change caused by intrinsic factors. The decline in rotation of the insert could be explained by increased impingement and the formation of fibrous tissue.

Effect of glucosamine sulphate on joint space narrowing, pain and function in patients with hip osteoarthritis; subgroup analyses of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Recently we reported that glucosamine sulphate (GS) did not have an effect on the symptoms and progression of primary care patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this present study was to investigate whether there are subgroups of patients with hip OA for whom GS might be an effective therapy. METHOD: We randomized 222 patients with hip OA that met one of the American College of Rheumatology criteria to either 1500 mg of oral GS or placebo once daily for 2 years. Subgroup analyses were predefined for radiographic severity (Kellgren & Lawrence (KL)=1 vs >or=2) and for type of OA (localised vs generalised). Additional exploratory subgroup analyses focused on groups based on pain level, pain medication use, baseline joint space width (JSW), and concomitant knee OA at baseline. Primary outcome measures were Western Ontario MacMaster Universities (WOMAC) pain and function scores over 24 months, and joint space narrowing (JSN) after 24 months. RESULTS: In the predefined subgroups based on radiographic severity and type of OA, the outcomes WOMAC pain, function and JSN were similar for the GS and placebo group. CONCLUSION: GS was not significantly better than placebo in reducing symptoms and progression of hip OA in subgroups of patients.

Precision assessment of model-based RSA for a total knee prosthesis in a biplanar set-up.

Model-based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) was recently developed for the measurement of prosthesis micromotion. Its main advantage is that markers do not need to be attached to the implants as traditional marker-based RSA requires. Model-based RSA has only been tested in uniplanar radiographic set-ups. A biplanar set-up would theoretically facilitate the pose estimation algorithm, since radiographic projections would show more different shape features of the implants than in uniplanar images. We tested the precision of model-based RSA and compared it with that of the traditional marker-based method in a biplanar set-up. Micromotions of both tibial and femoral components were measured with both the techniques from double examinations of patients participating in a clinical study. The results showed that in the biplanar set-up model-based RSA presents a homogeneous distribution of precision for all the translation directions, but an inhomogeneous error for rotations, especially internal-external rotation presented higher errors than rotations about the transverse and sagittal axes. Model-based RSA was less precise than the marker-based method, although the differences were not significant for the translations and rotations of the tibial component, with the exception of the internal-external rotations. For both prosthesis components the precisions of model-based RSA were below 0.2 mm for all the translations, and below 0.3 degrees for rotations about transverse and sagittal axes. These values are still acceptable for clinical studies aimed at evaluating total knee prosthesis micromotion. In a biplanar set-up model-based RSA is a valid alternative to traditional marker-based RSA where marking of the prosthesis is an enormous disadvantage.

Limited rotation of the mobile-bearing in a rotating platform total knee prosthesis.

The hypothesis of this study was that the polyethylene bearing in a rotating platform total knee prosthesis shows axial rotation during a step-up motion, thereby facilitating the theoretical advantages of mobile-bearing knee prostheses. We examined 10 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had a rotating platform total knee arthroplasty (NexGen LPS mobile, Zimmer Inc. Warsaw, USA). Fluoroscopic data was collected during a step-up motion six months postoperatively. A 3D-2D model fitting technique was used to reconstruct the in vivo 3D kinematics. The femoral component showed more axial rotation than the polyethylene mobile-bearing insert compared to the tibia during extension. In eight knees, the femoral component rotated internally with respect to the tibia during extension. In the other two knees the femoral component rotated externally with respect to the tibia. In all 10 patients, the femur showed more axial rotation than the mobile-bearing insert indicating the femoral component was sliding on the polyethylene of the rotating platform during the step-up motion. Possible explanations are a too limited conformity between femoral component and insert, the anterior located pivot location of the investigated rotating platform design, polyethylene on metal impingement and fibrous tissue formation between the mobile-bearing insert and the tibial plateau.

Soft-tissue artefact assessment during step-up using fluoroscopy and skin-mounted markers.

When measuring knee kinematics with skin-mounted markers, soft tissue and structures surrounding the knee hide the actual underlying segment kinematics. Soft-tissue artefacts can be reduced when plate-mounted markers or marker trees are used instead of individual unconstrained mounted markers. The purpose of this study was to accurately quantify the soft-tissue artefacts and to compare two marker cluster fixation methods by using fluoroscopy of knee motion after total knee arthroplasty during a step-up task. Ten subjects participated 6 months after their total knee arthroplasty. The patients were randomised into (1) a plate-mounted marker group and (2) a strap-mounted marker group. Fluoroscopic data were collected during a step-up motion. A three-dimensional model fitting technique was used to reconstruct the in vivo 3-D positions of the markers and the implants representing the bones. The measurement errors associated with the thigh were generally larger (maximum translational error: 17mm; maximum rotational error 12 degrees ) than the measurement errors for the lower leg (maximum translational error: 11mm; maximum rotational error 10 degrees ). The strap-mounted group showed significant more translational errors than the plate-mounted group for both the shank (respectively, 3+/-2.2 and 0+/-2.0mm, p = 0.025) and the thigh (2+/-2.0 and 0+/-5.9mm, p = 0.031). The qualitative conclusions based on interpretation of the calculated estimates of effects within the longitudinal mixed-effects modelling evaluation of the data for the two groups (separately) were effectively identical. The soft-tissue artefacts across knee flexion angle could not be distinguished from zero for both groups. For all cases, recorded soft-tissue artefacts were less variable within subjects than between subjects. The large soft-tissue artefacts, when using clustered skin markers, irrespective of the fixation method, question the usefulness of parameters found with external movement registration and clinical interpretation of stair data in small patient groups.

The kinematic elbow axis as a parameter to evaluate total elbow replacement: A cadaver study of the iBP elbow system.

Malpositioning of prosthetic implants leads to biomechanical changes, often resulting in deteriorating functional outcome. This emphasizes the relevance of evaluating the surgical process of inserting the prostheses. This study tested to what extent the iBP elbow prosthesis and its alignment tools enabled a surgeon to reconstruct normal joint kinematics. It demonstrates the use of the kinematic elbow axis as an evaluation tool. An electromagnetic tracking device registered controlled passive elbow flexion of 10 embalmed upper extremities. The position and direction of the preoperative and postoperative kinematic elbow axes were established with the use of helical axes and compared. The postoperative position of the elbow axis differed from the preoperative axis because of limitations of the alignment tools. Suggestions for adjustment of the alignment tools are made. The direction of the imposed resection plane was correct; therefore, the direction of the postoperative elbow axis corresponded with the direction of the preoperative axis.