Adaptación en las UCI de las recomendaciones de los proyectos ZERO durante la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2 / No disponible

No disponible

Ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients is associated with lower mortality: results from EU-VAP study.

BACKGROUND: Differences in trauma patients developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are described regarding etiology and risk factors associated. We aim to describe the differences in outcomes in trauma and nontrauma patients with VAP. METHODS: A prospective, observational study conducted in 27 intensive care units from nine European countries. We included patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for >48 hours who developed VAP. Logistic regression model was used to assess the factors independently associated with mortality in trauma patients with VAP. RESULTS: A total of 2,436 patients were evaluated; 465 developed VAP and of these 128 (27.5%) were trauma patients. Trauma patients were younger than nontrauma (45.3 ± 19.4 vs. 61.1 ± 16.7, p < 0.0001). Nontrauma had higher simplified acute physiology score II compared with trauma patients (45.5 ± 16.3 vs. 41.1 ± 15.2, p = 0.009). Most prevalent pathogens in trauma patients with early VAP were Enterobacteriaceae spp. (46.9% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.06) followed by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (30.6% vs. 13%, p = 0.03) and then Haemophilus influenzae (14.3% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.02), and the most prevalent pathogen in late VAP was Acinetobacter baumannii (12.2% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.0001). Mortality was higher in nontrauma patients than in trauma patients (42.6% vs. 17.2%, p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 3.55, 95%CI = 2.14-5.88). A logistic regression model adjusted for sex, age, severity of illness at intensive care unit admission, and sepsis-related organ failure assessment score at the day of VAP diagnosis confirmed that trauma was associated with a lower mortality compared with nontrauma patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.37, 95%CI = 0.21-0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients developing VAP had different demographic characteristics and episodes of etiology. After adjustment for potential confounders, VAP episodes in trauma patients are associated with lower mortality when compared with nontrauma patients.

Modified sequential multiplex PCR for determining capsular serotypes of invasive pneumococci recovered from Seville.

The heptavalent pneumococcal vaccine's introduction resulted in a decline in invasive disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, but was accompanied by an increase in non-vaccine serotypes. We evaluated a modified scheme of the sequential multiplex PCRs adapted to the prevalence of serotypes in Seville (Spain) for determining capsular serotypes of S. pneumoniae invasive clinical isolates. In adults, the modified scheme allowed us to type 73% with the first three reactions, and 92% with two additional PCRs. In paediatric patients, it allowed us to type 73.5% with the first three reactions, and 90% with the two additional PCRs. The multiplex PCR approach was successfully adapted to target the serotypes most prevalent in Seville.

[Pseudomonas aeruginosa: combined treatment vs. monotherapy]. / Pseudomonas aeruginosa: tratamiento combinado frente a monoterapia.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a pathogen commonly encountered in clinical practice in critically ill patients. It is a serious cause of infection, associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and delay in starting effective antimicrobial therapy is associated with worse prognostic. This microorganism is clinically indistinguishable from others forms of gram-negative bacterial infection. The rate of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa has increased in the last years. For these reasons, patients with Pseudomonas infection might receive empirical antibiotics that are inactive against Pseudomonas, especially before antibiotic susceptibility results become available. It remains controversial whether combination therapy, given empirically or as definitive treatment, for suspected Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections is justifiable. In the present article, we aimed to review recent studies that have evaluated the impact of combination therapy on Pseudomonas infections outcome and we exhibit our point of view in this subject. It seems justifiable to start combination therapy with two antipseudomonal agents in patients with risk for Pseudomonas infection during the first 3-5 days, until having microbiological results. This combination therapy must be changed to monotherapy on the basis on the specific susceptibility pattern of the initial isolate. In cases without microbiological diagnosis and poor outcome, combination therapy will be maintained and other causes of infection will be studied. Multicentre prospective randomized trials in critically ill patients are needed to determine which antimicrobials combinations improve outcome in Pseudomonas infections.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: tratamiento combinado frente a monoterapia / Pseudomonas aeruginosa: combined treatment vs. monotherapy

Pseudomonas aeruginosa constituye uno de los microorganismos más frecuentemente aislados en la práctica clínica en los pacientes críticos. Es causante de infecciones con una elevada morbilidad y mortalidad. El tratamiento antibiótico inapropiado o el retraso en el inicio de éste se asocia a un peor pronóstico. La infección por P. aeruginosa es clínicamente indistinguible de otras infecciones por bacilos gramnegativos u otros patógenos. La resistencia a antibióticos de P. aeruginosa ha aumentado en los últimos años. Por ello, los pacientes con infección por Pseudomonas podrían recibir tratamiento inactivo frente a ella, especialmente hasta que se disponga de los resultados de susceptibilidad antibiótica. La conveniencia del tratamiento antibiótico combinado sobre la monoterapia en las infecciones por P. aeruginosa ha sido ampliamente debatido. En el presente artículo se resumen las evidencias existentes, y se intenta extraer conclusiones prácticas al respecto. Parece razonable la indicación de tratamiento antibiótico empírico con dos antibióticos activos frente a P. aeruginosa en los pacientes con riesgo de infección para este patógeno durante los primeros 3-5 días, hasta conocer los resultados de los estudios microbiológicos. Si la evolución clínica es favorable y se dispone de etiología, es conveniente pasar a la monoterapia más adecuada. En los casos en que la evolución no sea favorable y no se disponga de los resultados de microbiología, parece recomendable seguir con tratamiento combinado, además de descartar otras causas de evolución tórpida. De todos modos, se necesitan más estudios prospectivos, randomizados en pacientes críticos que evalúen qué combinaciones antibióticas pueden mejorar la evolución en las infecciones por Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a pathogen commonly encountered in clinical practice in critically ill patients. It is a serious cause of infection, associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and delay in starting effective antimicrobial therapy is associated with worse prognostic. This microorganism is clinically indistinguishable from others forms of gram-negative bacterial infection. The rate of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa has increased in the last years. For these reasons, patients with Pseudomonas infection might receive empirical antibiotics that are inactive against Pseudomonas, especially before antibiotic susceptibility results become available. It remains controversial whether combination therapy, given empirically or as definitive treatment, for suspected Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections is justifiable. In the present article, we aimed to review recent studies that have evaluated the impact of combination therapy on Pseudomonas infections outcome and we exhibit our point of view in this subject. It seems justifiable to start combination therapy with two antipseudomonal agents in patients with risk for Pseudomonas infection during the first 3-5 days, until having microbiological results. This combination therapy must be changed to monotherapy on the basis on the specific susceptibility pattern of the initial isolate. In cases without microbiological diagnosis and poor outcome, combination therapy will be maintained and other causes of infection will be studied. Multicentre prospective randomized trials in critically ill patients are needed to determine which antimicrobials combinations improve outcome in Pseudomonas infections

Antibiotic prescription for community-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit: impact of adherence to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines on survival.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to analyze prognostic factors associated with mortality for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter study including all patients with CAP admitted to the intensive care unit during a 15-month period in 33 Spanish hospitals. Admission data and data on the evolution of the disease were recorded. Multivariate analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical package (SPSS). RESULTS: A total of 529 patients with severe CAP were enrolled; the mean age (+/-SD) was 59.9+/-16.1 years, and the mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (+/-SD) was 18.9+/-7.4. Overall mortality among patients in the intensive case unit was 27.9% (148 patients). The rate of adherence to Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines was 57.8%. Significantly higher mortality was documented among patients with nonadherence to treatment (33.2% vs. 24.2%). Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio [OR], 1.7), APACHE II score (OR, 4.1), nonadherence to IDSA guidelines (OR, 1.6), and immunocompromise (OR, 1.9) as the variables present at admission to the intensive care unit that were independently associated with death in the intensive care unit. In 15 (75%) of 20 cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, the antimicrobial treatment at admission was inadequate (including 8 of 15 cases involving patients with adherence to IDSA guidelines). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 17.9), malignancy (OR, 11.0), previous antibiotic exposure (OR, 6.2), and radiographic findings demonstrating rapid spread of disease (OR, 3.9) were associated with P. aeruginosa pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Better adherence to IDSA guidelines would help to improve survival among patients with severe CAP. Pseudomonas coverage should be considered for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignancy, or recent antibiotic exposure.

International Conference for the Development of Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important health problem that still generates great controversy. A consensus conference attended by 12 researchers from Europe and Latin America was held to discuss strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of VAP. Commonly asked questions concerning VAP management were selected for discussion by the participating researchers. Possible answers to the questions were presented to the researchers, who then recorded their preferences anonymously. This was followed by open discussion when the results were known. In general, peers thought that early microbiological examinations are warranted and contribute to improving the use of antibiotherapy. Nevertheless, no consensus was reached regarding choices of antimicrobial agents or the optimal duration of therapy. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the preferred choice for empiric therapy, followed by a cephalosporin with antipseudomonal activity and a carbapenem. All the peers agreed that the pathogens causing VAP and multiresistance patterns in their ICUs were substantially different from those reported in studies in the United States. Pathogens and multiresistance patterns also varied from researcher to researcher inside the group. Consensus was reached on the importance of local epidemiology surveillance programs and on the need for customized empiric antimicrobial choices to respond to local patterns of pathogens and susceptibilities.

Severe community-acquired pneumonia. Etiology, prognosis, and treatment.

The frequency of community-acquired pneumonia coupled with its mortality rate of 10 to 25% is of growing concern to clinicians. A prospective study of 67 patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia was carried out to determine the causative agents, the impact fore-knowledge of the etiology has on the outcome, the value of clinical and radiologic criteria in predicting the evolution, and the efficacy of empirical therapy. The study group included 45 men and 22 women (mean age: 56.8 +/- 16.6 yr), and 46.2% suffered from a concurrent debilitating disease. The cause of pneumonia was diagnosed in 32 cases, and the most common pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (37.5%), Legionella pneumophila (21.8%), and gram-negative bacilli (25.0%). The fact that fungal infections were present in three patients and Pneumocystis carinii in one are worthy of note. The overall death rate was 20.8%. A fatal outcome was related to the age of the patient (p less than 0.05), the presence of debilitating disease (p = 0.026), and septic shock (p = 0.0009). Diagnosis of the causative agents did not aid in increasing the survival rate, but it did allow for better patient management. Most of the patients (85.1%) initiated on treatment with erythromycin plus tobramycin recovered, but only 68.4% of the subjects commenced on treatment with other therapeutics survived. Furthermore, it was necessary to modify the therapy of a greater percentage of the latter group (p less than 0.025). Gram-negative bacillary pneumonia was a frequent finding among the patients who did not recover, making empirical treatment with erythromycin plus third generation cephalosporins most advisable for severe cases of community-acquired pneumonia.