Developing a hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) gynecologic oncology program: a Canadian experience.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a treatment option for epithelial ovarian cancer following cytoreductive surgery. The intraperitoneal spread of the disease makes the peritoneal cavity an ideal target for drug delivery. HIPEC has shown promising results in improving overall survival in epithelial ovarian cancer patients when performed during interval cytoreductive surgery. Recent studies have provided level 1 evidence supporting increased overall survival in stage III ovarian cancer patients treated with HIPEC during interval cytoreduction. Meta-analyses have further confirmed the survival improvement in women receiving HIPEC. Despite its inclusion in guidelines, many centers have been hesitant to implement HIPEC programs due to perceived obstacles, such as increased morbidity, cost, and resource requirements. Studies have shown that morbidity rates are acceptable in selected patients, and the addition of HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery is cost effective. Therefore, the main barrier to implementing HIPEC programs is related to resource requirements and logistics, but with proper preparation, these challenges can be overcome. Establishing a successful HIPEC program requires institutional support, a knowledgeable and dedicated team, adequate resources and equipment, and proper training and audit. This review aims to provide evidence based information to guide the development of successful HIPEC programs, including preoperative, anesthetic, and surgical considerations. It also reviews the different equipment and protocols for the perfusion and common postoperative events.

Regional pleural strain measurements during mechanical ventilation using ultrasound elastography: A randomized, crossover, proof of concept physiologic study.

Background: Mechanical ventilation is a common therapy in operating rooms and intensive care units. When ill-adapted, it can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), which is associated with poor outcomes. Excessive regional pulmonary strain is thought to be a major mechanism responsible for VILI. Scarce bedside methods exist to measure regional pulmonary strain. We propose a novel way to measure regional pleural strain using ultrasound elastography. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and reliability of pleural strain measurement by ultrasound elastography and to determine if elastography parameters would correlate with varying tidal volumes. Methods: A single-blind randomized crossover proof of concept study was conducted July to October 2017 at a tertiary care referral center. Ten patients requiring general anesthesia for elective surgery were recruited. After induction, patients received tidal volumes of 6, 8, 10, and 12 mL.kg-1 in random order, while pleural ultrasound cineloops were acquired at 4 standardized locations. Ultrasound radiofrequency speckle tracking allowed computing various pleural translation, strain and shear components. We screened 6 elastography parameters (lateral translation, lateral absolute translation, lateral strain, lateral absolute strain, lateral absolute shear and Von Mises Strain) to identify those with the best dose-response with tidal volumes using linear mixed effect models. Goodness-of-fit was assessed by the coefficient of determination. Intraobserver, interobserver and test-retest reliability were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: Analysis was possible in 90.7% of ultrasound cineloops. Lateral absolute shear, lateral absolute strain and Von Mises strain varied significantly with tidal volume and offered the best dose-responses and data modeling fits. Point estimates for intraobserver reliability measures were excellent for all 3 parameters (0.94, 0.94, and 0.93, respectively). Point estimates for interobserver (0.84, 0.83, and 0.77, respectively) and test-retest (0.85, 0.82, and 0.76, respectively) reliability measures were good. Conclusion: Strain imaging is feasible and reproducible. Future studies will have to investigate the clinical relevance of this novel imaging modality. Clinical trial registration: www.Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03092557.

Preliminary experience in the use of preoperative echo-guided left stellate ganglion block in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary arterial (PA) vasoconstriction in cardiac surgery can originate from the action of combined humoral, endothelial, and sympathetic tone changes. The consequence of PA vasoconstriction is pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and, when present after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), can predispose to right ventricular dysfunction. Right ventricular dysfunction after CPB is a serious complication with high mortality rates. The extent to which sympathetic blockade could reduce PA vasoconstriction and reduce PHT is unknown. Pharmacologic stellate ganglion block (SGB) has been associated with a reduction in PHT, but its role and mechanism in cardiac surgery have not been described. Thus, the goal of the study was to test the hypothesis that echo-guided left SGB, performed before the induction of general anesthesia, could prevent PA pressure increases during CPB weaning. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study in cardiac surgical patients. SETTING: A tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty cardiac surgical patients. INTERVENTIONS: A left SGB was performed immediately before the induction of general anesthesia under ultrasound guidance and was compared with matched control patients. Standard hemodynamic and electrocardiographic monitoring was performed, and blood gas samples were drawn at specific predetermined time points for analysis. Rhythm disorders, echocardiographic parameters that included wall motion abnormalities, and biochemical parameters of myocardial ischemia were measured by an observer blinded to the allocated group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Marked improvement in the PaO(2)/F(I)O(2) ratio in the SGB group was observed (mean difference = 77 mmHg, p = 0.0001). There were no differences between the groups in PA pressure over time during the procedure; central venous pressure was higher in the SGB group (p =0.0184). Reductions of right ventricular fractional area change (p = 0.0331) and tricuspid annulus displacement (p = 0.0048) were observed in the SGB group. The CK-MB was 1.5 times higher in the SGB group (p = 0.0211), but no patients developed myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Left SBG was associated with improved oxygenation that could partially explain its mechanism in acute PHT. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the usefulness of this technique in patients with a high risk of PHT during separation from CPB.