Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 160(3): 442-7, 1989 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2668428

RESUMO

Ceftriaxone was compared with cefotaxime for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The dose of ceftriaxone was 2 g once a day, and the dose of cefotaxime was 2 g every 4 h. Metronidazole was added if anaerobic infection was suspected. Explicit criteria were used to define infections, clinical response, and adverse effects. Ceftriaxone was given to 88 patients and cefotaxime to 83. The two treatment groups did not differ in types of infection, infecting organisms, and severity of underlying disease. The response rate was 81% (71/88) for ceftriaxone and 80% (66/83) for cefotaxime. The power of the study to detect a 15% difference in response rate at P less than .1 was 90%. The frequency of diarrhea, thrombophlebitis, prothrombin time, prolongation, colonization, and superinfection did not differ between treatment groups. Ceftriaxone 2 g once a day was as safe and effective as cefotaxime 2 g every 4 h for suspected serious bacterial infections.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Cefotaxima/uso terapêutico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Cefotaxima/administração & dosagem , Cefotaxima/efeitos adversos , Ceftriaxona/administração & dosagem , Ceftriaxona/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...