Standard versus personalized schedule of regorafenib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective, multicenter, real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Despite its proven activity as third-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), regorafenib can present a poor tolerability profile which often leads to treatment modifications and transient or permanent discontinuation; thus, in clinical practice physicians usually adopt various dosing and interval schedules to counteract regorafenib-related adverse events and avoid treatment interruption. The aim of this real-world study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of personalized schedules of regorafenib in patients with metastatic GIST, in comparison with the standard schedule (160 mg daily, 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Institutional registries across seven Italian reference centers were retrospectively reviewed and data of interest retrieved to identify patients with GIST who had received regorafenib from February 2013 to January 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival and the log-rank test to make comparisons. RESULTS: Of a total of 152 patients with GIST, 49 were treated with standard dose, while 103 received personalized schedules. At a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.73-11.0 months] versus 9.7 months (95% CI 7.9-14.5 months) in the standard-dose and the personalized schedule groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.34-0.75; P = 0.00052]. Median overall survival was 16.6 months (95% CI 14.1-21.8 months) versus 20.5 months (95% CI 15.0-25.4 months), respectively (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.49-1.22; P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib-personalized schedules are commonly adopted in daily clinical practice of high-volume GIST expert centers and correlate with significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, regorafenib treatment optimization in patients with GIST may represent the best strategy to maximize long-term therapy.

Analytical performance and clinical decision limit of a new release for cardiac troponin I assay.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponins (cTns) are the 'gold standard' biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome. Analytical performance is critical at low concentrations of cTn, and many of the current assays do not meet the guideline requirement of a 10% coefficient of variation (CV) at the 99th percentile concentrations. The aim of the study was to establish if the newly released Access® AccuTnI®+3 (AccuTnI+3) cardiac troponin I assay (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA) reached this objective. METHODS: All AccuTnI+3 assays were performed on UniCel® DxI800 analyzer (Beckman Coulter Inc). Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) were determined according to Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute EP17-A and EP5-A2 protocols. The 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) was determined by analysing serum samples from 330 apparently healthy blood donors (260 men, 70 women, age range 18-70 years, median age 36 years). RESULTS: LoB and LoD values were 2.6 and 12 ng/L, respectively. The 10% CV was at 18 ng/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 8-25). The 99th percentile URL was 22 ng/L (95% CI 11-34). CONCLUSIONS: The newly released assay has improved low-end analytical performance and reaches the goal of having a total imprecision ≤ 10% at 99th percentile of a healthy reference population (guideline acceptable). With this assay, it is now possible to utilize the 99th percentile as decision level for myocardial injury detection.

Weekly paclitaxel plus capecitabine in advanced breast cancer patients: dose-finding trial of GOIRC and GOL.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel and capecitabine have demonstrated a synergic effect and significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer. A weekly schedule of paclitaxel obtained a response rate of 50-68% in advanced breast cancer and less serious side-effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with chemotherapy were enrolled in a dose-finding trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of paclitaxel given on days 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle combined with capecitabine given twice daily from day 1 through day 14, every 21 days. Three patients were recruited at one of six dose levels (paclitaxel 70-100 mg/m2, capecitabine 1650-2500 mg/m2). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were accrued and 31 were evaluated for toxicity. One DLT has been experienced at level VI as diarrhea grade 3. We determined dose level V as the MTD, but we recommend dose level IV for phase II studies (capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally twice daily plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously weekly), owing to cumulative toxicity at level V. The objective response rate was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel plus capecitabine is a safety and active chemotherapy in previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

Gemcitabine with or without continuous infusion 5-FU in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised phase II trial of the Italian oncology group for clinical research (GOIRC).

This study was performed to determine the activity of adding continuous infusion (CI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to gemcitabine (GEM) vs GEM alone in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). In all, 94 chemo-naïve patients with APC were randomised to receive GEM alone (arm A: 1000 mg m(-2) per week for 7 weeks followed by a 2 week rest period, then weekly for 3 consecutive weeks out of every 4 weeks) or in combination with CI 5-FU (arm B: CI 5-FU 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 6 weeks followed by a 2 week rest period, then for 3 weeks every 4 weeks). Overall response rate (RR) was the primary end point and criteria for decision were planned according to the Simon's optimal two-stage design. The overall RR was 8% (arm A) and 11% (arm B) (95% confidence interval: 0.5-16% and 2-22%), respectively, and stable disease was 29 and 28%. The median duration of RR was 34 weeks (range 25-101 weeks) for GEM and 26 weeks (range 16-46 weeks) for the combination. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14 weeks (range 2-65 weeks) and 18 weeks (range 4-51 weeks), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 31 weeks (range 1-101 weeks) and 30 weeks (1-101 weeks). Toxicity was mild in both arms. This study does not show promising activity in terms of RR, PFS and OS for the double combination arm in APC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of colon cancer: randomized multicenter trial of the Italian National Intergroup of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer (INTACC).

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the addition of leucovorin to the combination 5-fluorouracil plus levamisole prolongs disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with radically resected colon cancer (Dukes' B(2-3) and C). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (1703) were accrued between March 1992 and February 1995 in a large-scale clinical trial within five Italian cooperative groups. After stratification for center, patients were randomized as follows: arm A, 5-fluorouracil [450 mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) bolus on days 1-5] and levamisole (150 mg orally for 3 days, every 14 days for 6 months) versus arm B, 6-S-leucovorin (100 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1-5) followed by 5-fluorouracil (370 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1-5), plus levamisole (as arm A), every 4 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 6.4 years no significant difference was seen for either disease-free survival (58% versus 60%, not significant) or 5-year overall survival (68% versus 71%, not significant), respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity (World Health Organization grade 3/4) was more frequent in arm B (8% versus 18%, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial the schedules used showed no statistically significant differences in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (PELF) is more active than 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) in advanced gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) and cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-FU (PELF) have both been reported to be superior to the combination 5-FU, doxorubicin and mitomycin C (FAM) in advanced gastric carcinoma. On the basis of the presence and dose intensity of the included agents, we hypothesised that PELF would be superior to FAMTX. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients with untreated advanced gastric carcinoma were randomised to receive PELF or FAMTX for a maximum of six cycles or until disease progression. RESULTS: The complete response (CR) rates to PELF and FAMTX were, respectively, 13% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 6% to 20%] and 2% (95% CI 0% to 5%; P = 0.003), and the objective response rates [CR plus partial response (PR) rates] 39% (95% CI 29% to 49%) and 22% (95% CI 13% to 30%; P = 0.009), thus significantly favouring the PELF combination. The survival rates after 12 months (30.8% versus 22.4%) and 24 months (15.7% versus 9.5%) were also higher among patients receiving PELF, but these differences were not statistically significant. The toxicities were qualitatively different but quantitatively similar. Both regimens seem to be feasible provided that careful patient monitoring is assured. CONCLUSIONS: PELF is significantly more active than FAMTX and deserves further research in the adjuvant setting.

Decreased myelotoxicity of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with cisplatin infusion on day 15.

In a multicenter phase II Italian trial that used a 28-day dosing schedule of gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin on day 2, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the main dose-limiting toxicities observed. The aim of the present study was to determine whether using 15-day cisplatin in lieu of the standard 2-day schedule in combination with weekly gemcitabine would decrease expected myelotoxicities, particularly thrombocytopenia. Fifty-one patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a median age of 62 years (range 31-76) and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scores of 0-1, were enrolled. Twenty-four patients had stage IIIA-B disease and 27 had stage IV. Patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day-15, every 28 days for a total of 151 cycles. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 16% of patients, grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 35% of patients, and grade 3 anemia in 4% of patients (no grade 4 anemia). Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Two patients had grade 3 vomiting, and another had grade 4 hepatic toxicity only after gemcitabine administration. The dose intensity of gemcitabine and cisplatin was well maintained. Of the 45 patients evaluable for response, there were 22 (49%) partial responders, 7 (15.5%) minimal responders, 9 (20%) with stable disease, and 7 (15.5%) progressions. Compared with the schedule used in a multicenter phase II Italian trial (day 2 cisplatin), day-15 cisplatin decreases incidences of thrombocytopenia (16 vs. 52%) and anemia (4 vs. 25%); the occurrence of neutropenia is similar (35 vs. 36%). Response rates are also similar (49 vs. 54%).

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer: a dose-finding study.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are both active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). The aim of this dose-finding trial was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the activity of the combination in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five chemotherapy-pretreated patients received the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Capecitabine was administered orally twice a day continuously for 14 days in doses ranging from 1,650 to 2,500 mg/m2/d, and oxaliplatin was administered as a two-hour infusion on day 1 using dose, ranges from 100 to 130 mg/m2 repeated every three weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were assessable for toxicity, and DLTs were diarrhea (grade > or = 3: 27%) and stomatitis (grade > or = 3: 9%) at dose level VI. Dose level V (capecitabine 2500 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2) was found to be the MTD. Hematological toxicity was minimal, overall neurotoxicity (grade 1-4) was 27% with 1% grade 3-4. A global response rate was 17% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2%-32%) and the median overall survival was 12 months. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for further phase II studies is capecitabine 2,500 mg/m2/d with intermittent schedule and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2 every three weeks. The toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal: diarrhea, stomatitis and vomiting. This combination should be studied in phase II trials in advanced colorectal.

Capecitabine, a new oral fluoropyrimidine for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Capecitabine (Xeloda)(R) was developed as a tumour-selective fluoropyrimidine carbamate to achieve higher intratumoural 5-FU level and lower toxicity than 5-FU. Capecitabine passes unchanged through the gastrointestinal tract and is metabolised in the liver to 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR). Here it is converted to doxifluridine (5'-DFUR) and finally, 5'-DFUR is metabolised by thymidine phosphorilase to 5-FU at the tumour site. Preclinical studies have demonstrated capecitabine's activity in both 5-FU-sensitive and 5-FU-resistant tumours. In a randomised phase II trial in advanced colorectal cancer the recommended dose and schedule of Capecitabine is 2.510 mg/m(2)/day (total dose divided into two equal morning and evening doses) given in an intermittent schedule (2 weeks on/1 week off). Phase III trials in patients with advanced colorectal cancer show a better response rate than the Mayo Clinic schedule, with no differences in terms of DR, PFS. Diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome were the principal grade 3/4 toxicities noted, occurring in 10% and 16% of patients, respectively. The selectivity of this drug opens an important prospective in the treatment of colorectal cancer in advanced and adjuvant setting.

5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid with or without ifosfamide in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II randomized trial.

AIM: This phase II trial evaluated the biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid (FA) with or without ifosfamide (IFO) in chemotherapy-naive patients with colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients were randomized to receive: FA (25 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), followed by 5-FU (750 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), arm A; or FA (25 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), followed by 5-FU (750 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3) plus IFO (2,000 mg/m2 in 1000 mL 5% dextrose in a 2-hr infusion, days 1 to 3), arm B. Mesna was added during and after IFO to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis. Treatment was repeated every 21 days in both arms. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were assessable for response: in arm A, 5 patients achieved a partial response (overall response, 25%), and in arm B, 2 patients achieved a complete and 1 a partial response (overall response, 12%). Time to failure was 3.5 months (range, 1-38) in patients treated with 5-FU plus FA, and 3 months (range, 1-21) in patients treated with the IFO combination. The median survival time was 13.5 months (range, 1-49 months) in arm A and 16 months (range, 1-43 months) in arm B. Diarrhea, stomatitis and vomiting were the most common nonhematologic toxicities in both arms. The most notable hematologic toxicity was leukopenia; 15% and 20% of patients experienced grade 4 in arm A and arm B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IFO does not increase the activity of the 5-FU plus FA combination in advanced colorectal cancer.

Modulation of fluorouracil by methotrexate, leucovorin, and cisplatin (M-FLP) in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC).

The objective of this trial was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil by leucovorin, methotrexate, and platinum in patients with advanced measurable disease. Thirty-five patients with histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with methotrexate (100 mg/m2 in 500 ml 5% dextrose in a 2-hour infusion, day 1), 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day, i.v. in continuous infusion from days 2 to 5) plus 1-leucovorin (7.5 mg/m2 given per os every 6 hours, from days 2 to 5) and platinum (60 mg/m2 i.v., day 2), every 28 days. Four partial responses (12%; exact 95% confidence interval: 1-23%) were obtained in 34 evaluable patients with a median survival time of 49 weeks (range, 20-77 weeks). Ten (29%) of 34 patients had stable disease. Median time to treatment failure from the beginning of therapy was 11 weeks (range, 4-59 weeks) and median survival time was 20 weeks (range, 4-77 weeks). The most common grade III-IV toxicities were diarrhea (15%), stomatitis (41%), and vomiting (17%). Hematologic toxicity was mild. There were no therapy-related deaths. In conclusion, this trial did not report an increase or improvement in response rate and survival rates, and this regimen cannot be recommended as effective therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.