Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
CRISPR J ; 2(6): 441-449, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31742431

RESUMO

Advances in CRISPR technology and the announcement of the first gene-edited babies have sparked a global dialogue about the future of heritable genome editing (HGE). There has been an international call for public input to inform a substantive debate about benefits and risks of HGE. This study investigates the views of the sickle cell disease (SCD) community. We utilized a mixed-methods approach to examine SCD stakeholders' views in the United States. We found SCD stakeholders hold a nuanced view of HGE. Assuming the technology is shown to be safe and effective, they are just as supportive of HGE as genetics professionals, but more supportive than the general public. However, they are also concerned about the potential implications of HGE, despite this support. As discourse surrounding HGE advances, it is crucial to engage disease communities and other key stakeholders whose lives could be altered by these interventions.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/genética , Anemia Falciforme/terapia , Edição de Genes/ética , Adulto , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas/genética , Repetições Palindrômicas Curtas Agrupadas e Regularmente Espaçadas/genética , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Edição de Genes/métodos , Terapia Genética/ética , Terapia Genética/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação dos Interessados/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...