Schooling experiences in children with long-gap esophageal atresia compared with children with esophageal atresia and primary anastomosis: a Swedish study.

BACKGROUND: Children with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) risk living with aerodigestive morbidity and mental health difficulties. No previous study has investigated their experiences of schooling, despite the importance of schools in children's development, learning and social relationships. We aimed to describe experiences of schooling in children with LGEA in Sweden in comparison with children with EA who had primary anastomosis. METHOD: Children with LGEA aged 3-17 were recruited nationwide in Sweden. One parent completed a survey on their child's school-based supports (according to definitions from the Swedish National Agency for Education), school absence, school satisfaction, school functioning (PedsQL 4.0), mental health (Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire) and current symptomatology. School data were compared between 26 children with LGEA to that from 95 children with EA who had PA, a hypothesized milder affected group. Mental health level was determined using validated norms; abnormal ≥ 90 percentile. Data were analyzed using descriptives, correlation and Mann-Whitney-U test. Significance level was p < 0.05. RESULTS: Formal school-based support was reported in 17 (65.4%) children with LGEA and concerned support with nutritional intake (60%), education (50%) and medical/special health needs (35%). The prevalence of school-based support was significantly higher compared to children with PA overall (36.8%, p = 0.013) and regarding nutritional intake support (20%, p < 0.001). In children with LGEA, school-based support was related to low birth weight (p = 0.036), young child age (p = 0.014), height ≤ -2SD for age/sex (p = 0.024) and an increased number of aerodigestive symptoms (p < 0.05). All children with LGEA who had abnormal mental health scores had school-based support, except for one child. Nine children with LGEA (36%) had school absence ≥ 1times/month the past year, more frequently because of colds/airway infections (p = 0.045) and GI-specific problems compared to PA (p = 0.003). School functioning scores were not significantly different from children with PA (p = 0.34) but correlated negatively with school-based support (< 0.001) and school absence (p = 0.002). One parent out of 26 reported their child's school satisfaction as "not good". CONCLUSIONS: Children with LGEA commonly receive school-based support, reflecting multifaceted daily needs and disease severity. School absence is frequent and related to poorer school functioning. Future research focusing on academic achievement in children with EA is needed.

The prevalence and role of coping strategies in the nutritional intake of children born with esophageal atresia: a condition-specific approach.

This study describes results of a condition-specific approach to the assessment of coping strategies in nutritional intake situations used by children with esophageal atresia. One hundred three families of children 2-17 years old with esophageal atresia participated (94% response rate). Following standardized focus groups with 30 families, nine coping items were developed, reflecting nine different coping strategies in nutritional intake situations. The coping items were pilot tested by 73 new families and evaluated for feasibility, validity, and reliability. The families also completed a validated condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for children with esophageal atresia, which included the scale Eating-Quality-of-life. Data were analyzed using descriptives, between-group analysis, and Spearman's rho (P < 0.05). Altogether, the coping items were feasible, valid, and reliable. Items reflecting problem-focused strategies revealed that 89% of 2-17 years old 'recognized their responsibility' and managed nutritional intake problems on their own, 79% 'tried to solve their feeding problems' testing different solutions, 79% took a 'confronting approach' to do what peers did in eating situations, and 54% 'sought other people's support'. Items reflecting emotion-focused strategies showed that 86% of the children 'accepted' their feeding difficulties, 68% 'reappraised feeding difficulties into positive outcomes' such as to eat only when food tasted good. Moreover, 63% of the children 'avoided' nutritional intake situations, 29% 'expressed worry or fear' when faced with these situations, while 25% 'distanced' themselves from eating problems by hiding or throwing away food. The children's use of coping strategies were mostly related to the existence of digestive symptoms (P < 0.05). Positive and negative coping strategies were identified. Of particular note was a correlation cluster of the so-called disengagement strategies 'avoidance', 'expression of emotional concerns' and 'distancing'. These strategies were negatively correlated with Eating-Quality-of-Life. Conversely, taking a 'confronting approach' correlated positively with Eating-Quality-of-life (P < 0.05). Hence, most children with esophageal atresia employ various coping strategies in nutritional intake situations. A good Eating-Quality-of-life may be positively affected by treating digestive morbidity and encouraging children to take an active approach to their eating problems rather than using disengagement coping.

Development and pilot-testing of a condition-specific instrument to assess the quality-of-life in children and adolescents born with esophageal atresia.

The survival rate of children with esophageal atresia has today reached 95%. However, children are at risk of chronic morbidity related to esophageal and respiratory dysfunction, and associated anomalies. This study describes the pilot testing of a condition-specific health-related quality-of-life instrument for children with esophageal atresia in Sweden and Germany, using a patient-derived development approach consistent with international guidelines. Following a literature review, standardized focus groups were conducted with 30 Swedish families of children with esophageal atresia aged 2-17 years. The results were used for item generation of two age-specific pilot questionnaire versions. These were then translated from Swedish into German with considerations of linguistic and semantical perspectives. The 30-item pilot questionnaire for children aged 2-7 years was completed by 34 families (parent report), and the 50-item pilot questionnaire for children aged 8-17 years was completed by 52 families (51 child report, 52 parent report), with an overall response rate of 96% in the total sample. Based on predefined psychometric criteria, poorly performing items were removed, resulting in an 18-item version with three domains (Eating, Physical health and treatment, Social isolation and stress,) for children aged 2-7 years and a 26-item version with four domains (Eating, Social relationships, Body perception, and Health and well-being) for children aged 8-17 years. Both versions demonstrated good internal consistency reliability and acceptable convergent and known-groups validity for the total scores. The study identified specific health-related quality-of-life domains for pediatric patients with esophageal atresia, highlighting issues that are important for follow-up care. After field testing in a larger patient sample, this instrument can be used to enhance the evaluation of pediatric surgical care.

Coping strategies used by children and adolescents born with esophageal atresia - a focus group study obtaining the child and parent perspective.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare malformation, which requires surgical treatment. Survival rates today reach 95%, but EA remains a significant cause of chronic morbidity with increased risk of psychosocial problems and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL). No study of coping strategies of children with EA has been reported in the literature to date, but increased knowledge could lead to improved outcomes and better HRQOL. METHODS: Standardized focus groups with children with EA and their parents were conducted to identify issues related to health care needs and HRQOL, with group members relating their coping experiences. Identified coping statements were content analysed using a card sorting procedure and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Thirty families (18 children 8-17 years; 32 parents of children with EA 2-17 years) participated in 10 focus groups. A total of 590 coping statements were recorded. Nine coping strategies were identified: problem solving (n = 116), avoidance (n = 95), recognizing responsibility (n = 71), confronting (n = 70), seeking social support (n = 63), positive reappraisal (n = 58), emotional expression (n = 46), acceptance (n = 40) and distancing (n = 31). Nine situational contexts were identified: nutritional intake (n = 227), communication of one's health condition (n = 78), self-perception when experiencing troublesome symptoms (n = 59), appearance of body or scar(s) (n = 57), physical activities like sport and play (n = 43), sleep (n = 34), hospital care (n = 33), stigmatization and social exclusion (n = 30) and medication intake (n = 29). CONCLUSIONS: Focus group methodology contributed to an increased understanding of disease-specific coping processes among children and adolescence with EA. Findings illustrate that they use several coping strategies, some of which they seem to adopt at early age and use in disease-related contexts of physical, social and emotional character. Such coping may influence health and HRQOL in children with EA. In view of the importance of establishing good coping strategies early in life, health care professionals should integrate coping aspects into care management. Future studies are warranted.

Piglet model for studying esophageal regrowth after resection and interposition of a silicone stented small intestinal submucosa tube.

PURPOSE: To investigate the use and subsequent healing of a silicone stented small intestinal submucosa (SIS) tube as a full-circumference replacement following surgical resection of the esophagus in piglets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three centimeters of the intrathoracic esophagus was replaced with a silicone stented SIS tube (Cook Medical) in 6 growing piglets. The esophageal stent was retained for 4 weeks. Esophageal dilations were performed, if needed, after stent removal. RESULTS: The piglets were sacrificed 1-17 weeks after surgery. Recurrent dilations were needed after stent removal. Histology showed that the gap between the resection margins was filled with new loose connective tissue consisting of fibroblasts and few inflammatory cells. In this tissue, intense angiogenesis was seen at the early time points, which then gave way to the proliferation of immature-looking smooth-muscle-like cells in the submucosa, which appeared to stem from the pericytes of the ingrowing capillaries. CONCLUSIONS: Through using a stented SIS tube as a circumferential esophageal replacement in a piglet model, this study suggests that pericytes from ingrowing capillaries may play a role in the remodeling of the SIS mesh. It remains to be seen if this process gives a favorable end result because stricture formation after stent removal remains a problem.

Dysphagia in adults operated on for esophageal atresia--use of a symptom score to evaluate correlated factors.

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia is not unusual following repair of esophageal atresia (EA). The lack of a uniform definition has led to a variance when it comes to reporting the prevalence of dysphagia among patients operated on for EA. Our aim is to estimate the occurrence and degree of dysphagia, using a numerical score with its statistical versatility independent of a specific definition. The results are used to find early risk factors of dysphagia within this patient group. The results are also used to see whether we can find a correlation between dysphagia and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: 79 consecutive survivors operated on for EA in Gothenburg between 1968 and 1983 were located. Hospital charts were reviewed and patients received questionnaires on dysphagia, symptoms of GER and QoL. Dysphagia was measured by a numerical score, symptoms of GER were extracted using a predetermined questionnaire (GerdQ), and QoL was determined using the generic questionnaire SF-36. RESULTS: 73 patients (92.4%) returned the questionnaires. In order to make the study group as homogeneous as possible with regard to the malformation we choose to study the 63 patients representing the vast majority: those with Gross type C. 36 patients (57%) had symptoms of dysphagia to varying degrees. We did not find any aggravating factors in their hospital charts nor did we find any correlation to the most recent demographics. There was a significant difference in dysphagia scores when we compared Gross type C to the often more complex type A (p<0.05). We did not find any correlation to heartburn but a strong correlation to regurgitation with an OR of 2.8 (95% CI: 1.2-6.6). The QoL was good for this patient group, and we did not find any correlation between QoL and the dysphagia score. CONCLUSIONS: The dysphagia score provides easy-to-use results when it comes to evaluating the potential influence of dysphagia. Dysphagia is common within this patient group. Patients operated on for EA Gross type A seem to do worse when it comes to dysphagia. Regurgitation is associated with dysphagia, which could imply that GER is an aggravating factor. Further studies to support this finding will show whether there is a correlation between the dysphagia score and the results of 24-h pH-monitoring. If so, this could mean that treating GER might decrease dysphagia, at least in this patient group.